A Review of the Food Safety of Bt Crops

  • Bruce G. HammondEmail author
  • Michael S. Koch


There is a 50-year history of safe use and consumption of agricultural food crops sprayed with commercial Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) microbial pesticides and a 14 year history of safe consumption of food and feed derived from Bt crops. This review summarizes the published literature addressing the safety of Cry insect control proteins found in both Bt microbial pesticides and those introduced into Bt agricultural crops. A discussion on the species-specific mode of action of Cry proteins to control target insect pests is presented. This information provides the scientific basis for the absence of toxicity of Cry proteins towards non-target organisms that has been confirmed in numerous mammalian toxicology studies. A human dietary exposure assessment for Cry proteins has also been provided which includes information that food processing of Bt crops such as maize leads to loss of functionally active Cry proteins in processed food products. Lastly the food and feed safety benefits of Bt crops are briefly summarized including lower insecticide use and reduction in fumonisin mycotoxin contamination of grain.


Food safety Cry proteins Toxicity Bt crops Consumption of Cry proteins 


  1. Adel-Patient K, Guimaraes VD, Paris A, Drumare MF, Ah-Leung S, Lamourette P, Nevers MC, Canlet C, Molina J, Bernard H, Créminon C, Wal JM (2010) Immunological and metabolomic impacts of administration of Cry1Ab protein and MON 810 maize in mouse. PLoS One 6(1):e16346. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appenzeller LM, Malley LA, MacKenzie SA, Everds N, Hoban D, Delaney B (2009) Subchronic feeding study with genetically modified stacked trait lepidopteran and coleopteran resistant (DAS Ø15Ø7 1 x DAS-59122-7) maize grain in Sprague-Dawley rats. Food Chem Toxicol 47:1512–1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aris A, Leblanc S (2011) Maternal and fetal exposure to pesticides associated to genetically modified foods in Eastern Townships of Quebec, Canada. Reprod Toxicol 31:528–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berk Z (1992) Technology of production of edible flours and protein products from soybeans. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin No. 97Google Scholar
  5. Betz FS, Hammond BG, Fuchs RL (2000) Safety and advantages of Bacillus thuringiensis-protected plants to control insect pests. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 32:156–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bogani P, Minunni M, Spiriti M, Zavaglia M, Tombelli S (2008) Transgenes monitoring in an industrial soybean processing chain by DNA-based conventional approaches and biosensors. Food Chem 113:658–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bondzio A, Stumpff F, Schön J, Martens H, Einspanier R (2008) Impact of Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ab on rumen epithelial cells (REC)—A new in vitro model for safety assessment of recombinant food compounds. Food Chem Toxicol 46:1976–1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Branden C, Tooze J (2001) Introduction to protein structure. Garland Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Brake J, Faust MA, Stein J (2003) Evaluation of transgenic event Bt 11 hybrid maize in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 82:551–559Google Scholar
  10. Bravo A, Gill SS, Soberón M (2007) Mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry and Cyt toxins and their potential for insect control. Toxicon 49(4):423–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cao S, He X, Xu W, Ran W, Liang L, Luo Y, Yuan Y, Zhang N, Zhou X, Huang K (2010) Safety assessment of Cry1C protein from genetically modified rice according to the national standards of PR China for a new food source. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 58(3):474–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CAST (2003) Mycotoxins. Risks in plant, animal, and human systems. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. Task Force Report No. 139Google Scholar
  13. Chowdhury EH, Kuribara H, Hino A, Sultana P, Mikami O, Shimada N, Guruge NS, Saito M, Nakajima Y (2003a) Detection of maize intrinsic and recombinant DNA fragments and Cry1Ab protein in the gastrointestinal contents of pigs fed genetically modified maize Bt11. J Anim Sci 81:2546–2551Google Scholar
  14. Chowdhury EH, Shimada N, Murata H, Mikami O, Sultana P, Miyazaki S, Yoshioka M, Yamanaka N, Hirai N, Nakajima Y (2003b) Detection of Cry1Ab protein in the gastrointestinal contents but not in the visceral organs of genetically modified Bt11-fed calves. Vet Hum Toxicol 45:72–75Google Scholar
  15. Codex (2009) WHO/FAO. Foods derived from modern biotechnology, 2nd edn. RomeGoogle Scholar
  16. Codex (2010) Committee on Sampling and Detection Methods (CCMAS). Proposed draft guidelines on performance criteria and validation of methods for detection, identification, and quantification of specific DNA sequences and specific proteins in food (At step 5/8 of the procedure). ALINORM 10/33/23. Appendix III, pp 47–68Google Scholar
  17. Creighton TE (1993) Proteins: structures and molecular properties. W.H. Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Delaney B, Astwood JD, Cunny H, Eichen Coon R, Herouet-Guicheney C, MacIntosh S, Meyer LS, Privalle L, Gao Y, Mattsson J, Levine M (2008) Evaluation of protein safety in the context of agricultural biotechnology. Food Chem Toxicol 46:S71–S97Google Scholar
  19. de Luis R, Lavilla M, Sánchez L, Calvo MD, Pérez M (2009) Immunochemical detection of Cry1A(b) protein in model processed foods made with transgenic maize. Eur Food Res Technol 229:15–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dryzga MD, Yano BL, Andrus AK, Mattsson JL (2007) Evaluation of the safety and nutritional equivalence of a genetically modified cottonseed meal in a 90 day dietary toxicity study in rats. Food Chem Toxicol 45:1994–2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duensing WJ, Roskens AB, Alexander RJ (2003) Chapter 11. Maize dry milling: processes, products, and applications. In: White P, Johnson L (eds) Maize chemistry and technology, 2nd edn. AAOCS, St PaulGoogle Scholar
  22. EFSA (2005a) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on an application (Reference EFSA GMO UK 2004 01) for the placing on the market of glyphosate tolerant and insect-resistant genetically modified maize NK603 × MON810, for food and feed uses, and import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto (Question No EFSA Q-2004-086). EFSA J 309:1–22Google Scholar
  23. EFSA (2005b) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on an application (Reference EFSA GMO UK 2004 06) for the placing on the market of insect-protected glyphosate tolerant genetically modified maize MON863 × NK603, for food and feed uses, and import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto (Question No EFSA Q 2004 154). EFSA J 255:1–21Google Scholar
  24. EFSA (2005c) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on an application (Reference EFSA GMO BE 2004 07) for the placing on the market of insect protected glyphosate tolerant genetically modified maize MON863 × MON810 × NK603, for food and feed uses, and import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto (Question No EFSA Q 2004 159). EFSA J 256:1–25Google Scholar
  25. EFSA (2005d) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to the Notification (Reference C/DE/02/9) for the placing on the market of insect-protected genetically modified maize MON 863 x MON 810, for import and processing, under Part C of Directive 2001/18/EC from Monsanto. EFSA J 251:1–22Google Scholar
  26. EFSA (2007) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on an application (Reference EFSA-GMO-NL-2005-12) for the placing on the market of insect-resistant genetically modified maize 59122, for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, from Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. and Mycogen Seeds, c/o Dow Agrosciences LLC. EFSA J 470:1–25Google Scholar
  27. EFSA (2008) Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. Food Chem Toxicol 46:S2–S70Google Scholar
  28. EFSA (2011) Guidance for risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified plants. EFSA J 9(5):2150Google Scholar
  29. EPA (1998) EPA Registration Eligibility Decision (RED) Bacillus thuringiensis EPA 738-R-98-004Google Scholar
  30. EPA (2001) Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1F protein and the genetic material necessary for its production in maize; exemption from the requirement for a tolerance. Fed Regist 66(109):30321Google Scholar
  31. EPA (2004) Bacillus thuringiensis VIP3A insect control protein and the genetic material necessary for its production; notice of a filing to a pesticide petition to amend the exemption from the requirement for a tolerance for a certain pesticide chemical in the food. Fed Regist 69(178):55605Google Scholar
  32. EPA (2008a) Exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for the Bacillus Thuringiensis Cry1A.105 protein in maize. 40 CFR 174.502Google Scholar
  33. EPA (2008b) Exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for the Bacillus Thuringiensis Cry2Ab2 protein in maize. 40 CFR 174.503Google Scholar
  34. EPA (2010) Biopesticide Registration Action Document. Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac Protein and the Genetic Material (Vector PV-GMIR9) Necessary for Its Production in MON 87701 (OECD Unique Identifier: MON 877Ø1-2) Soybean (PC Code 006532). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division. Accessed 8 Oct 2010Google Scholar
  35. Federici B, Siegel J (2008) Safety assessment of Bacillus thuringiensis and Bt crops used in insect control. In: Hammond BG (ed) Food safety of proteins in agricultural biotechnology. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  36. Finamore A, Roselli M, Britti S, Monastra G, Ambra R, Turrini A, Mengheri E (2008) Intestinal and peripheral immune response to MON810 maize ingestion in weaning and old mice. J Agric Food Chem 56:11533–11539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fisher R, Rosner L (1959) Toxicology of the microbial insecticide, Thuricide. J Agric Food Chem 7:686–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Flachowsky G, Chesson A, Aulrich K (2005a) Animal nutrition with feeds from genetically modified plants. Arch Anim Nutr 59:1–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Flachowsky G, Halle I, Aulrich K (2005b) Long term feeding of Bt-maize—a ten generation study with quails. Arch Anim Nutr 59:449–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Flachowsky G, Aulrich K, Bohme H, Halle I (2007) Studies on feeds from genetically modified plants (GMP)—Contributions to nutritional and safety assessment. Anim Feed Sci Technol 133:2–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Folcher L, Delos M, Marengue E, Jarry M, Weissenberger A, Eychenne N, Regnault-Roger C (2010) Lower mycotoxin levels in Bt maize. Agron Sustain Dev 30:711–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Frederiksen K, Rosenquist H, Jørgensen K, Wilcks A (2006) Occurrence of natural Bacillus thuringiensis contaminants and residues of Bacillus thuringiensis-based insecticides on fresh fruits and vegetables. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(5):3435–3440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Goodman R, Vieths S, Sampson HA, Hill D, Ebisawa M, Taylor SL, Ree R van (2008) Allergenicity assessment of genetically modified crops—what makes sense? Nat Biotechnol 26:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Griffiths JS, Haslam SM, Yang T, Garczynski SF, Mulloy B, Morris H, Cremer PS, Dell A, Adang MJ, Aroian RV (2005) Glycolipids as receptors for Bacillus thuringiensis crystal toxin. Science 307:922–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Grothaus GD, Bandla M, Currier T, Giroux R, Jenkins GR, Lipp M, Shan G, Stave JW, Pantella V (2006) Immunoassay as an analytical tool in agricultural biotechnology. AOAC Int 89(4):913–928Google Scholar
  46. Guimaraes V, Drumare MF, Lereclus D, Gohar M, Lamourette P, Nevers MC, Vaisanen-Tunkelrott ML, Bernard H, Guillon B, Creminon C, Wal JM, Adel-Patient K (2010) In vitro digestion of Cry1Ab proteins and analysis of the impact on their immunoreactivity. J Agric Food Chem 58:3222–3231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hammond B, Cockburn A (2008) The safety assessment of proteins introduced into crops developed through agricultural biotechnology: a consolidated approach to meet current and future needs. In: Hammond BG (ed) Food safety of proteins in agricultural biotechnology. CRC Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Hammond BG, Jez JM (2011) Impact of food processing on the safety assessment for proteins introduced into biotechnology-derived soybean and maize crops. Food Chem Toxicol 49(4):711–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hammond BG, Dudek R, Lemen JK, Nemeth MA (2006a) Results of a 90-day safety assurance study with rats fed grain from maize borer-protected maize. Food Chem Toxicol 44(7):1092–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hammond B, Lemen J, Dudek R, Ward D, Jiang C, Nemeth M, Burns J (2006b) Results of a 90-day safety assurance study with rats fed grain from maize rootworm-protected maize. Food Chem Toxicol 44(2):147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. He XY, Huang KL, Li X, Qin W, Delaney B, Luo YB (2008) Comparison of grain from maize rootworm resistant transgenic DAS 59122-7 maize with non transgenic maize grain in a 90 day feeding study in Sprague Dawley rats. Food Chem Toxicol 46:1994–2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Healy C, Hammond B, Kirkpatrick J (2008) Results of a 90 day safety assurance study with rats fed grain from maize rootworm protected, glyphosate tolerant MON 88017 maize. Food Chem Toxicol 46:2517–2524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Herman RA, Schafer BW, Korjagin VA, Ernest AD (2003) Rapid digestion of Cry34Ab1 and Cry35Ab1 in simulated gastric fluid. J Agric Food Chem 51:6823–6827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Herman RA, Storer NP, Gao Y (2006) Acid-induced unfolding kinetics in simulated gastric digestion of proteins. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 46:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hofmann C, Luthy P, Hutter R, Piska V (1988a) Binding of the delta endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis to brush-border membrane vesicles of the Cabbage Butterfly (Pieris brassicae). Eur J Biochem 173:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hofmann C, Vanderbruggen H, Hofte H, Van Rie J, Jansens S, Van Mellaert H (1988b) Specificity of B. thuringiensis delta-endotoxins is correlated with the presence of high affinity binding sites in the brush-border membrane of target insect midgastrointestinal tracts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:7844–7848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Huang DF, Zhang J, Song FP, Lang ZH (2007) Microbial control and biotechnology research on Bacillus thuringiensis in China. J Invertebr Pathol 95:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. James C (2010) Global Status of Commercialized Biotech GM Crops: 2010 International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). ISAAA Briefs brief 42Google Scholar
  59. Juberg DR, Herman RA, Thomas J, Delaney B (2009) Acute and Repeated Dose (28 Day) Mouse Oral Toxicology Studies with Cry34Ab1 and Cry35Ab1 Bt Proteins Used in Coleopteran Resistant DAS-59122-1 Maize. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 54:154–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kilara A, Sharkasi T (1986) Effects of temperature on food proteins and its implications on functional properties. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 23(4):323–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kroghsbo S, Madsen C, Poulsen M, Schroder M, Kvist PH, Taylor M, Gatehouse A, Shu Q, Knudsen L (2008) Immunotoxicological studies of genetically modified rice expressing PHA-E lectin or Bt toxin in Wistar rats. Toxicology 245:24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kouser S, Qaim M (2011) Impact of Bt cotton on pesticide poisoning in smallholder agriculture: a panel data analysis. Ecol Econ 70(11):2105–2113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lambert B, Buysse L, Decock C, Jansens S, Piens C, Saey B, Seurinck J, Van Audenhove K, Van Rie J, Van Vliet A, Peferoen M (1996) A Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal protein with a high activity against members of the family Noctuidae. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:80–86Google Scholar
  64. Latte KP, Appel KE, Lampen A (2011) Health benefits and possible risks of broccoli. Food Chem Toxicol 49:3287–3309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Li FQ, Yoshizawa T, Kawamura O, Luo XY, Li YW (2001) Aflatoxins and fumonisins in maize from the high-incidence area for human hepatocellular carcinoma in Guangxi, China. J Agric Food Chem 49:4122–4126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. MacKenzie SA, Lamb I, Schmidt J, Deege L, Morrisey MJ, Harper M, Layton RJ, Prochaska LM, Sanders C, Locke M, Mattsson JL, Fuentes A, Delaney B (2007) Thirteen week feeding study with transgenic maize grain containing event DASO15O7 1 in Sprague–Dawley rats. Food Chem Toxicol 45:551–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Marasas WFO, Riley RL, Hendricks KA, Stevens VL, Sadler TW, Waes JG van, Missmer SA, Cabrera J, Torres O, Gelderblom WCA, Allegood J, Martínez C, Maddox J, Miller JD, Starr L, Sullards MC, Roman AV, Voss KA, Wang E, Merrill AH Jr (2004) Fumonisins disrupt sphingolipid metabolism, folate transport, and neural tube development in embryo culture and in vivo: a potential risk factor for human neural tube defects among populations consuming fumonisin-contaminated maize. J Nutr 134:711–716Google Scholar
  68. Malley LA, Everds NE, Reynolds J, Mann PC, Lamb I, Rood T, Schmidt J, Layton RL, Prochaska LM, Hinds M, Locke M, Chui CF, Claussen F, Mattsson JL, Delaney B (2007) Subchronic feeding study of DAS 59122 7 maize grain in Sprague Dawley rats. Food Chem Toxicol 45:1277–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Margarit E, Reggiardo M, Vallejos R, Permingeat H (2006) Detection of Bt transgenic maize in foodstuffs. Food Res Int 39:250–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McClintock J, Schaffer C, Sjoblad R (1995) A comparative review of the mammalian toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis-based pesticides. Pestic Sci 45:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. McNaughton JL, Roberts M, Rice D, Smith B, Hinds M, Schmidt J, Locke M, Bryant A, Rood T, Layton R, Lamb I, Delaney B (2007) Feeding performance in broiler chickens fed diets containing DAS-59122-7 maize grain compared to diets containing non-transgenic maize grain. Anim Feed Sci Technol 132:227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Meade S, Reid E, Gerrard J (2005) The impact of processing on the nutritional quality of food proteins. J AOAC Int 88(3):904–922Google Scholar
  73. Mendelsohn M, Kough J, Vaituzis Z, Matthews K (2003) Are Bt crops safe? Nat Biotechnol 21:1003–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Miller JD (2001) Factors That affect the occurrence of fumonisin. Environ Health Perspect 109(Suppl 2):321–324Google Scholar
  75. Moreno-Fierros L, Garcia N, Gastrointestinal tractierrez R, Lopez-Revilla R, Vazquez-Padron RI (2000) Intranasal, rectal and intraperitoneal immunization with protoxin Cry1Ac from Bacillus thuringiensis induces compartmentalized serum, intestinal, vaginal and pulmonary immune responses in Balb/c mice. Microbes Infect 2:885–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Noteborn HPJ, Bienenmann-Ploum ME, Berg JHJ van den, Alink GM, Zolla L, Reynaerts A, Pensa M, Kuiper HA (1995) Safety Assessment of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal protein CRYIA(b) expressed in transgenic tomato. In: Engel K-H, Takeoka GR, Teranishi R (eds) Genetically modified foods: safety issues. American Chemical Society, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  77. OECD (2007) Consensus document on safety information on transgenic plants expressing Bacillus thuringiensis—derived insect control proteins. In Joint Meeting of the Chemicals Committee and the Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  78. Ofori-Anti AO, Ariyarathna H, Chen L, Lee HL, Pramod SN, Goodman RE (2008) Establishing objective detection limits for pepsin digestion assay used in the assessment of genetically modified foods. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 52:94–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Okunuki H, Teshima R, Shigeta T, Sakushima J, Akiyama H, Goda Y, Toyoda M, Sawada J (2001) Increased digestibility of two products in genetically modified food (CP-4 EPSPS and Cry1Ab) after preheating. J Food Hyg Soc Jpn 43(2):68–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Onose J, Imai T, Hasumura M, Ueda M, Ozeki Y, Hirose M (2008) Evaluation of subchronic toxicity of dietary administered Cry1Ab protein from Bacillus thuringiensis var. Kurustaki HD-1 in F344 male rats with chemically induced gastrointestinal impairment. Food Chem Toxicol 46:2184–2189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ostry V, Ovesna J, Skarkova J, Pouchova V, Ruprich J (2010) A review on comparative data concerning Fusarium mycotoxins in Bt maize and non-Bt isogenic maize. Mycotox Res 26:141–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Paul V, Steinke K, Meyer HH (2008) Development and validation of a sensitive enzyme immunoassay for surveillance of Cry1Ab toxin in bovine blood plasma of cows fed Bt-maize (MON 810). Anal Chim Acta 607:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rooney LW, Serna-Saldivar SO (2003) Chapter 13. Food use of whole maize and dry-milled fractions. In: While PJ, Johnson LA (eds) Maize chemistry and technology, 2nd edn. American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc., St PaulGoogle Scholar
  84. Sacchi VF, Parenti P, Hanozet GM, Giordana B, Luthy P, Wolfersberger MG (1986) Bacillus thuringiensis toxin inhibits K+-gradient-dependent amino acid transport across the brush border membrane of Pieris brassicae midgastrointestinal tract cells. FEBS Lett 204:213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sanchis V (2010) From microbial sprays to insect-resistant transgenic plants: a history of the biopesticide Bacillus thuringiensis. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 1–15. doi:10.1051/agro/2010027Google Scholar
  86. Scheideler SE, Rice D, Smith B, Dana G, Sauber T (2008) Evaluation of nutritional equivalency of maize grain from DAS-Ø15Ø7-1 (Herculex I) in the diets of laying hens. J Appl Poult Res 17:383–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schrøder M, Poulsen M, Wilcks A, Kroghsbo S, Miller A, Frenzel T, Danier J, Rychlik M, Emami K, Gatehouse A, Shu Q, Engel KH, Altosaar I, Knudsen I (2007) A 90-day safety study of genetically modified rice expressing Cry1Ab protein (Bacillus thuringiensis toxin) in Wistar rats. Food Chem Toxicol 45(3):339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Schultz RM, Liebman MN (2002) Chapter 3. Proteins I: composition and structure. In: Devlin TM (ed) Textbook of biochemistry with clinical correlations, 5th edn. Wiley-Liss, NYGoogle Scholar
  89. Shimada N, Miyamoto K, Kanda K, Murata H (2006) Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal Cry1Ab toxin does not affect the membrane integrity of the mammalian intestinal epithelial cells: an in vitro study. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 42:45–49Google Scholar
  90. Siegel JP (2001) The mammalian safety of Bacillus thuringiensis-based insecticides. J Invertebr Pathol 77:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Siegel JP, Shadduck JA (1989) Safety of microbial insecticides to vertebrates, Chapter 8. In: Laird M, Lacey L, Davidson E (eds) Safety of microbial insecticides. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  92. Soberón M, Pardo L, Muñóz-Garay C, Sánchez J, Gómez I, Porta H, Bravo A (2010) Chapter 11. Pore formation by Cry toxins. In: Anderluh G, Lakey J (eds) Proteins: membrane binding and pore formation. Landes Bioscience and Springer Science + Business Media, NYGoogle Scholar
  93. Taylor ML, Hartnell G, Nemeth M, Karunanandaa K, George B (2005) Comparison of broiler performance when fed diets containing maize grain with insect-protected (maize rootworm and European maize borer) and herbicide-tolerant (glyphosate) traits, control maize, or commercial reference maize—revisited. Poult Sci 84:1893–1899Google Scholar
  94. Taylor M, Hartnell G, Nemeth M, Lucas D, Davis S (2007) Comparison of broiler performance when fed diets containing grain from second-generation insect-protected and glyphosate-tolerant, conventional control or commercial reference. Maize. Poult Sci 86:1972–1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Terry C, Harris N, Parkes HC (2002) Detection of genetically modified crops and their derivatives: critical steps in sample preparation and extraction. J AOAC Int 85:768–774Google Scholar
  96. Thomas K, Aalbers M, Bannon GA, Bartels M, Dearman RJ, Esdaile DJ, Fu TJ, Glatt CM, Hadfield N, Hatzos C, Hefle SL, Heylings JR, Goodman RE, Henry B, Herouet C, Holsapple M, Ladics GS, Landry TD, MacIntosh SC, Rice EA, Privalle LS, Steiner HY, Teshima R, Ree R van, Woolhiser M, Zawodnyk J (2004) A multi-laboratory evaluation of a common in vitro pepsin digestion assay protocol used in assessing the safety of novel proteins. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 39:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Thomas K, Herouet-Guicheney C, Ladics G, Bannon G, Cockburn A, Crevel R, Fitzpatrick J, Mills C, Privalle L, Veiths S (2007) Evaluating the effect of food processing on the potential human allergenicity of novel proteins: international workshop report. Food Chem Toxicol 45:1116–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Thomas K, MacIntosh S, Bannon G, Herouet-Guicheney C, Holsapple M, Ladics G, McClain S, Vieths S, Woolhiser M, Privalle L (2009) Scientific advancement of novel protein allergenicity evaluation: an overview of the HESI Protein Allergenicity Technical Committee (2000–2008). Food Chem Toxicol 47:1041–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Van Rie J, Jansens S, Hofte H, Degheele D, Van Mellaert H (1989) Specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins, importance of specific receptors on the brush border membrane of the mid-gastrointestinal tract of target insects. Eur J Biochem 186:239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Van Rie J, Jansens S, Hofte H, Degheele D, Van Mellaert H (1990) Receptors on the brush border membrane of the insect midgastrointestinal tract as determininants of the specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:1378–1385Google Scholar
  101. Vazquez-Padron RI, Gonzales-Cabrera J, Garcia-Toyar C, Neri-Bazan L, Lopez-Revilla R, Hernandez M, Moreno-Fierro L, De La Riva GA (2000) Cry1Ac protoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis sp. kurstaki HD73 binds to surface proteins in the mouse small intestine. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 271:54–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wang J, Wang S, Su J, Huang T, Hu X, Yu J, Wei Z, Liang Y, Liu Y, Luo H, Sun G (2003) Food contamination of fumonisin B1 in high-risk area of esophageal and liver cancer. Toxicol Sci 72:188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. WHO/GEMs Food Programme. Accessed 20 Aug 2011Google Scholar
  104. WHO/IPCS (International Programme on Chemical Safety) (1999) Environmental health criteria 217: microbial pest control agent Bacillus thuringiensis. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  105. Wolfersberger MG, Hofmann C, Luthy P (1986) In: Falmagne P, Alouf JEF, Fehrenbach J, Jeljaszewics J, Thelestam M (eds) Bacterial protein toxins. Fischer, NYGoogle Scholar
  106. Wu F, Miller JD, Casman EA (2004) The economic impact of Bt maize resulting from mycotoxin reduction. J Toxicol 23:393–419Google Scholar
  107. Xu W, Cao S, Hea X, Luoa Y, Guoa X, Yuan Y, Huanga K (2010) Safety Assessment of Cry1Ab/Ac fusion protein. Food Chem Toxicol 47(7):1716–1721Google Scholar
  108. Ziwen Y (2010) Hubei Bt Research and Development. Commercialization of Bacillus thuringiensis Insecticides in China. Accessed 24 Sept 2010Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Monsanto company, Product safety centerSt LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations