Skip to main content

Reframing Disability and Quality of Life: Contextual Nuances

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reframing Disability and Quality of Life

Part of the book series: Social Indicators Research Series ((SINS,volume 52))

Abstract

Research conducted with people living with a long-term condition or disability has relied primarily on quantitative instrumentation to determine quality of life. While quantitative instruments allow summary assessments of how health conditions impact upon people’s well-being, physical functioning, mental and emotional health, and social participation, they cannot provide insights into how and why assess their conditions under different personal circumstances and community conditions. Prior to introducing the chapters in this book, we expand on the importance of ethnographic and other qualitative research for a richer understanding of disability and quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albrecht, G. L., & Devlieger, P. J. (1999). The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Social Science & Medicine, 48(8), 977–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allotey, P., Reidpath, D., Kouamé, A., & Cummins, R. (2003). The DALY, context and the determinants of the severity of disease: An exploratory comparison of paraplegia in Australia and Cameroon. Social Science & Medicine, 57(5), 949–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2007). 6523.0: Household income and income distribution, Australia, 2005–06. Canberra: ABS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beadle, G. F., Yates, P. M., Najman, J. M., Clavarino, A., Thomson, D., Williams, G., Kenny, L., et al. (2004). Illusions in advanced cancer: The effect of belief systems and attitudes on quality of life. Psycho-Oncology, 13(1), 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhui, K., & Dinos, S. (2008). Health beliefs and culture: Essential considerations for outcome measurement. Disease Management and Health Outcomes, 16(6), 411–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaxter, M. (1976). The meaning of disability: A sociological study of impairment. New York: Neale Watson Academic Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortfeld, H. (2003). Comprehending idioms cross-linguistically. Experimental Psychology, 50(3), 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A. (2006). The capability approach: Its development, critique and recent advances. In D. A. Clark (Ed.), The Elgar companion to development studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P., & Black, S. E. (2005). Quality of life following stroke: Negotiating disability, identity, and resources. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 24(4), 319–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clavarino, A. M. (1999). Using quality of life endpoints in palliative care: The cultural implications. Anthropology and Medicine, 6(3), 437–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1997). Assessing quality of life. In R. I. Brown (Ed.), Quality of life for people with disabilities: Models, research and practice (pp. 116–150). Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes (Publishers) Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2005). Measuring health and subjective wellbeing: Vale, quality-adjusted life years. In L. Manderson (Ed.), Rethinking wellbeing (pp. 69–90). Perth: API Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faircloth, C. A., Boylstein, C., Rittman, M., Young, M. E., & Gubrium, J. (2004). Sudden illness and biographical flow in narratives of stroke recovery. Sociology of Health and Illness, 26(2), 242–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. W. (1995). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness, and ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, T. M., & Kurland, B. (2003). The burden and patterns of disability in activities of daily living among community-living older persons. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 58(1), M70–M75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, F., & McVittie, C. (2004). Is quality of life a healthy concept? Measuring and understanding life experiences of older people. Qualitative Health Research, 14(7), 961–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herdman, M., Fox-Rushby, J., & Badia, X. (1997). ‘Equivalence’ and the translation and adaptation of health-related quality of life questionnaires. Quality of Life Research, 6(3), 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2008). Vision metaphors for the intellect: Are they really cross-linguistic? Atlantis, 30(1), 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal wellbeing index. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., Ganiats, T., Sieber, W., & Anderson, J. (1998). The quality of well-being scale: Critical similarities and differences with SF-36. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 10(6), 509–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirmayer, L. J. (2001). Cultural variations in the clinical presentation of depression and anxiety: Implications for diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 62(Suppl 13), 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyobutungi, C., Egondi, T., & Ezeh, A. (2010). The health and well-being of older people in Nairobi’s slums. Global Health Action, 3(Suppl 2), 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallinson, S. (1998). The Short-Form 36 and older people: Some problems encountered when using postal administration. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52(5), 324–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallinson, S. (2002). Listening to respondents: A qualitative assessment of the short-form 36 health status questionnaire. Social Science & Medicine, 54(1), 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manderson, L. (2011). Surface tensions: Surgery, bodily boundaries and the social self. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manderson, L., & Smith-Morris, C. (Eds.). (2010). Chronic conditions, fluid states: Chronicity and the anthropology of illness. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manderson, L., & Warren, N. (2010). The art of (re)learning to walk: Trust on the rehabilitation ward. Qualitative Health Research, 20(10), 1418–1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manderson, L., & Warren, N. (2012). At the boundaries of the clinic: Discourses of trust in amputee care. In C. Candlin & J. Crichton (Eds.), Discourses of trust. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nord, E. (1991). EuroQOL: Health-related quality of life measurement. Valuations of health states by the general public in Norway. Health Policy, 18(1), 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2002). Capabilities and disabilities: Justice for mentally disabled citizens. Global Inequalities, Special Issue of Philosophical Topics, 30(2), 133–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2005). Well-being, contracts and capabilities. In L. Manderson (Ed.), Rethinking wellbeing (pp. 27–44). Perth: API Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership (The tanner lectures on human values). Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M. J. (1990). Damaged goods: Oral narratives of the experience of disability in American culture. Social Science & Medicine, 30(8), 849–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidpath, D. D., Allotey, P. A., Kouame, A., & Cummins, R. A. (2003). Measuring health in a vacuum: Examining the disability weight of the DALY. Health Policy and Planning, 18(4), 351–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1987). The standard of living: The tanner lectures. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science & Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A. L., & Nápoles-Springer, A. (2000). Health-related quality-of-life assessments in diverse population groups in the United States. Medical Care, 38(9, Suppl II), II102–II124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. E., Jr., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, N. (2009). Markers of midlife: Interrogating health, illness and ageing in rural Australia. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, N., & Manderson, L. (2008). Constructing hope: Discontinuity and the narrative construction of recovery in the rehabilitation unit. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37(2), 180–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, N., Manderson, L., & Misajon, R. (2009). More than SF-36? Using narratives to elaborate health and well-being data in recent lower-limb amputees. In V. Moller & D. Huschka (Eds.), Quality of life and the millennium challenge: Advances in quality-of-life studies, theory and research (pp. 59–80). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1996). WHOQOL-BREF: Introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment. Field trial version. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorkston, K. M., McMullan, K. A., Molton, I., & Jensen, M. P. (2010). Pathways of change experienced by people aging with disability: A focus group study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(20), 1697–1704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narelle Warren .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Warren, N., Manderson, L. (2013). Reframing Disability and Quality of Life: Contextual Nuances. In: Warren, N., Manderson, L. (eds) Reframing Disability and Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 52. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3018-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics