Skip to main content

Ecodesign through Environmental Risk Management: A Focus on Critical Materials

  • Conference paper
Design for Innovative Value Towards a Sustainable Society

Abstract

This paper presents an approach to Ecodesign based on the management of environmental business risks, which are defined as ‘stakeholder responses to environmental impacts with the potential to cause harm to business objectives’. Case studies are used to demonstrate the approach, with a particular focus on the management of critical materials. The paper concludes that by using risk, environmental considerations can be integrated into design decisions at Rolls-Royce, although the method contains significant uncertainties. In particular, the paper highlights the complexity of both assessing the supply risk of a material and how this could translate into an impact on the business. The paper also discusses how the risk model could be expanded to address other environmental business hazards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BSI (2009): Risk management - principles and guidelines, British Standards Institution (BSI), London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Matten, D. (1995): Strategy follows structure: environmental risk management in commercial enterprises, Business Strategy and the Environment, 4, pp. 107-116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pennington, D.W., Potting, J., Finnveden, G., Lindeijer, E., Jolliet, O., Rydberg, T., Rebitzer, G. (2004): Life cycle assessment part 2: Current impact assessment practice, Environment International, 30, pp. 721-739.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Graedel, T.E. (2007): Determining the criticality of materials, UNEP International Workshop on resource efficiency and recycling, Tokyo, September, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Morley, N., Eatherley, D. (2008): Material secturity: Ensuring resource availability for the UK economy, C-Tech Innovation, Chester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duclos, S., Otto, J.P., Konitzer, D.G. (2010): Design in an era of constrained resources. Mechanical Engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), September.

    Google Scholar 

  7. European Commission (2010): Critical raw materials for the EU, European Commission, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koizumi, Y., Kobayashi, T., Jianxin, Z., Yokokawa, T., Harada, H., Aoki, Y. and Arai, M. (2003): Development of next generation Ni-base single crystal superalloy. Proceedings of the International Gas Turbine Congress, Tokyo, 2-7 November, Gas Turbine Society of Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alonso, E. (2010): Materials scarcity from the perspective of manufacturing firms: risks, effects and responses, PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taleb, N., Goldstein, D.G., Spitznagel, M.W. (2009): The six mistakes executives make in risk management, Harvard Business Review, October, pp. 78-81.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lloyd, S., Lee, J., Clifton, A., Elghali, L., France, C. (2012). Ecodesign through Environmental Risk Management: A Focus on Critical Materials. In: Matsumoto, M., Umeda, Y., Masui, K., Fukushige, S. (eds) Design for Innovative Value Towards a Sustainable Society. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3010-6_72

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics