Design for Sustainable Behaviour Research Challenges

  • Casper Boks


This paper reviews the current state of Design for Sustainable Behaviour, and concludes that so far, the body of literature mostly presents, explains and structures possible design strategies, proposes design solutions based on these strategies, and presents case studies that evaluate the acceptance and effectiveness of such designs. In order to advance the field, three main research challenges have been identified. These are establishing a common terminology, more formalized research protocols for user centred research to better inform design solutions, and selecting target behaviours


Design for sustainable behaviour user centred design case study research research design 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Tromp, N., Hekkert, P., Verbeek, P.P. (2011): Design for Socially Responsible Behavior: A Classification of Influence Based on Intended User Experience. Design Issues, Vol. 27, No. 3Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wood, G., Newborough, M. (2003): Dynamic energy-consumption indicators for domestic appliances: environment, behaviour and design, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot- Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lockton, D., Harrison, D., Stanton, N. (2010): Design with Intent. 101 patterns for influencing behaviour through design. Windsor, Berkshire, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zachrisson, J., Boks, C. When to apply all those different design for sustainable behaviour strategies? (2010): Proceedings of Knowledge Collaboration & Learning for Sustainable Innovation ERSCP-EMSU conference, Delft, The Netherlands, October 25-29, 2010.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wever, R., van Kuijk, J., Boks, C. (2008): User- centred design for sustainable behaviour. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering. Vol. 1(1), pp. 9-20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pettersen, I.N., Boks, C. (2009): The future of design for sustainable behaviour. Proceedings of Ecodesign 2009, December 7-9. 2009, Sapporo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pettersen, I.N., Boks, C. (2009): The Ethics in Balancing Control and Freedom when Engineering Solutions for Sustainable Behaviour. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering. Vol. 1, No. 4, December 2008, pp. 287-297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stern, P.C. and Oskamp, S. (1987): Managing Scarce Environmental Resources, in D. Stokols and I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Akrich, M. (1992): The de-scription of technical objects. In W. Bijker and J. Law (Eds.) Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press: 205-224.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jelsma, J., Knot, M. (2002): Designing environmentally efficient services; a 'script'approach. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 2, 119-130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lilley, D., Lofthouse, V., Bhamra, T. (2005): Towards instinctive sustainable product use. Presented at the 2nd International Conference: Sustainability Creating the Culture, 2-4th November 2005, Aberdeen Exhibition & Conference Centre, Aberdeen, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elias, E., Dekoninck, E., Culley, S. (2007): The potential for domestic energy savings through assessing user behaviour and changes in design. In Proceedings of EcoDesign 2007, 10-13 December 2007, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bhamra, T., Lilley, D., Tang, T. (2008): Sustainable use: Changing Consumer Behaviour Through Product Design. In Proceedings of Changing the Change: Design Visions, Proposals and Tools, Turin, Italy.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zachrisson, J., Boks, C. (2011): Exploring Behavioural Psychology To Support Design For Sustainable Behaviour Research. Accepted for publication in the Journal of Design Research.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jelsma, J. (2006): Designing 'moralized' products. In Verbeek, P.P and Slob, A. (eds), User behavior and technology development: shaping sustainable relations between consumers and technologies, Springer, The Netherlands, pp. 221-31Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elias, E. (2009): User-Efficient Design. A Design Case Study for Industry, University of Bath, UK., 2009.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wever, R., van Onselen, L., Silvester, S., Boks, C. (2010): Influence of Packaging Design on Littering and Waste Behaviour. Packaging Technology and Science, Vol. 23(5), pp. 239-252Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lilley, D. (2009): Design for sustainable behaviour: strategies and perceptions, Design Studies, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 704-720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Laitala, K., Boks, C. (2011): Sustainable Clothing Design: Use Matters. Accepted for publication in the Journal of Design Research.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Laitala, K., Boks, C., Klepp, I. (2011): Potential for environmental improvements in laundering. International Journal of Consumer Studies, Volume 35, Number 2/March 2011Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Papantoniou, L., de Jong, A., Crul, M., Geelen, D., van Lieshout, M. (2010): A Social Approach To Energy Metering: The Energy Mentor, ERSCP- EMSU conference, Delft, The Netherlands, October 25-29Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zachrisson, J., St0rro, G., Boks, C. (2011): Experiences from Applying Theoretical Guidelines in a Design Project - Selecting Design Strategies for Behaviour Change. Proceedings of Ecodesign 2011, Kyoto, JapanGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zachrisson, J., 0ritsland, T.A., Boks, C. (2011): Investigating sustainable behaviour through user research, accepted for publication in FormAkademisk Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wigum, K.S., Zachrisson, J., Boks, C. (2011): The Role Of Product And System Interfaces In Designing Zero Emission Buildings. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium of Sustainable Systems and Technologies, May 2011, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mills Booth, E. (1996): Starting with behavior: A participatory process for selecting target behaviorsin environmental programs. Washington, DC: GreenCOM, Environmental Educationand Communication Project, US Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gardner, G. T., Stern, P. (2008): The Short List: The Most Effective Actions U.S. Households Can Take to Curb Climate Change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50(5), 12-25Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Casper Boks
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Product DesignNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations