Advertisement

Classifications and Rankings

  • Gero Federkeil
  • Frans A. van Vught
  • Don F. Westerheijden
Chapter
Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 37)

Abstract

This chapter examines higher education classifications and introduces the European U-Map classification tool and discusses a number of the most influential global league tables, their methodological underpinnings, scope, target groups and data sources.

Keywords

High Education High Education Institution European Patent Office League Table Global Ranking 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. AUBR Expert Group. (2009). Assessing Europe’s University-Based Research – Draft. s. l. Brussels: European Commission – DG Research.Google Scholar
  2. Berghoff, S., & Federkeil, G. (2006). Reputation indicators in university rankings. Paper presented at the CHER 19th Annual Conference, Kassel, Germany.Google Scholar
  3. Bonaccorsi, A., Brandt, T., De Filippo, D., Lepori, B., Molinari, F., Niederl, A., et al. (2010). Feasibility study for creating a European University Data Collection: Final study report. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General Research.Google Scholar
  4. Dill, D. D. (2006, September 7–9). Convergence and diversity: The role and influence of university rankings. Paper presented at the CHER 19th annual research conference, Kassel, Germany.Google Scholar
  5. Federkeil, G. (2006). Rankings and quality assurance in higher education. Higher Education in Europe, 33, 209–218.Google Scholar
  6. Federkeil, G. (2009). Reputation indicators in rankings of higher education institutions. In B. M. Kehm & B. Stensaker (Eds.), University rankings, diversity and the new landscape of higher education (pp. 19–34). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Hazelkorn, E. (2011). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kuh, G. D. (2011). Rehabbing the rankings: Fool’s errand or the Lord’s work. College & University, 86(4), 8–19.Google Scholar
  9. McCormick, A. C., & Zhao, C.-M. (2005, September/October). Rethinking and reframing the Carnegie classification. Change, 37, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Thibaud, A. (2009). Vers quel classement européen des universités? Etude comparative du classement de Shanghai et des autres classements internationaux (No. Note de Benchmarking 4). Brussels/Paris: Institut Thomas More.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gero Federkeil
    • 1
  • Frans A. van Vught
    • 2
  • Don F. Westerheijden
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Higher Education (CHE)GüterslohGermany
  2. 2.Center for Higher Education Policy StudiesUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations