Beyond the Market/State Binary Code: The Common Good as a Relational Good

Chapter
Part of the Ethical Economy book series (SEEP, volume 41)

Abstract

Donati is one of the best known Italian authors on social sciences. He is a professor at the University of Bologna and member of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences. He has written over 90 books, which have influenced parts of the encyclical Caritas in Veritate. His main theory is the ‘relational configuration of society’ which he here applies to economy. We are very proud of having won him for our project. In his essay he elaborates on the statement of Caritas in Veritate, that the exclusively binary model of State-market is corrosive of society (Benedict XVI. 2009. Encyclical Caritas in veritate. Vatican: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.). He shows that, in order to go beyond the present domination of the binomial market-State (lib-lab in Donati’s language), which destroys sociality, we need much more than good, honest and altruistic individuals: we need a societal configuration able to generate relational goods. Relational good is the name of the common good in a highly differentiated and globalised society. His theory is innovative and can be considered to be of great interest for the future.

Keywords

Civil Society Common Good Relational Good World System Economic Logic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Archer, M.S. 2000. Being human. The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Italian translation: 2007. Essere umani. Il problema dell’agire, ed. Prandini, R. Genova-Milano: Marietti.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, M.S. 2003. Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Italian translation: 2006. La conversazione interiore. Come nasce l’agire sociale. Trento: Edizioni Erickson.Google Scholar
  3. Archer, M.S. 2007. Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Italian translation: 2009. Riflessività umana e percorsi di vita. Come la soggettività umana influenza la mobilità sociale. Trento: Erickson.Google Scholar
  4. Archer, M.S. 2009. L’enciclica di Benedetto provoca la teoria sociale. Vita e Pensiero XCII 5: 52–56.Google Scholar
  5. Archer, M.S. (ed.). 2010. Conversations about reflexivity. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, U., Giddens, A., and S. Lash. 1994. Reflexive modernization. Cambridge: Polity Press. Italian translation: 1999. Modernizzazione riflessiva. Trieste: Asterios.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, U., W. Bonss, and C. Lau. 2003. The theory of reflexive modernization. Problematic, hypotheses and research program. Theory, Culture and Society 20(2): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benedict XVI. 2009. Encyclical caritas in veritate. Vatican: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Google Scholar
  9. Dahrendorf, R. 1994. The changing quality of citizenship. In The condition of citizenship, ed. B. van Steenberger, 10–19. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, K. 1959. The myth of functional analysis as a special method in sociology and anthropology. American Sociological Review 24(6): 757–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diwan, R. 2000. Relational wealth and the quality of life. Journal of Socio-Economics 29(4): 305–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donati, P. 1991. Teoria relazionale della società. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
  13. Donati, P. 2000. La cittadinanza societaria. Roma/Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  14. Donati, P. 2001. Il lavoro che emerge. Prospettive del lavoro come relazione sociale in una economia dopo-moderna. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
  15. Donati, P. 2003. Giving and social relations: The culture of free giving and its differentiation today. International Review of Sociology 13(2): 243–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donati, P., and L. Tronca. 2008. Il capitale sociale degli italiani. Le radici familiari, comunitarie e associative del civismo, Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
  17. Donati, P. 2008. Discovering the relational character of the common good. In Pursuing the common good: How solidarity and subsidiarity can work together, ed. M.S. Archer and P. Donati, 659–683. Vatican: PASS.Google Scholar
  18. Donati, P. 2009. Welfare e globalizzazione: fra mercificazione e demercificazione. Studi di Sociologia 47(1): 3–31.Google Scholar
  19. Donati, P. 2011. Reflexivity after modernity: From the viewpoint of relational sociology. In Relational sociology. A new paradigm for the social sciences, ed. P. Donati, 192–210. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Gotti Tedeschi, Ettore. 2005. Denaro e Paradiso. Casale Monferrato: Edizioni Piemme.Google Scholar
  21. Gotti Tedeschi, Ettore. 2007. Spiriti Animali. La concorrenza giusta. Milano: Università Bocconi Editore.Google Scholar
  22. Habermas, J. 1981. Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Italian translation: 1986. Teoria dell’agire comunicativo, vol. 2. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
  23. Lockwood, D. 1992. Social integration and system integration. In Solidarity and schism. ‘the problem of disorder’ in Durkheimian and Marxist sociology, ed. D. Lockwood, 399–412. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  24. Lockwood, D. 1999. Civic integration and social cohesion. In Capitalism and social cohesion: Essays on exclusion and integration, ed. I. Gough and G. Olofsson, 63–84. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Luhmann, N. 1984. Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Italian translation: 1990. Sistemi sociali. Fondamenti di una teoria generale. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
  26. Luhmann, N. 1997a. Limits of steering. Theory, Culture and Society 14(1): 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luhmann, N. 1997b. Globalization or world society: How to conceive of modern society? International Review of Sociology 7(1): 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luhmann, N. 1998. Politics and economy. Thesis Eleven 53: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Milano, Riccardo. 2010. Finanza islamica e finanza etica. Il denaro al servizio dell’uomo. newsletter@benecomune.net.Google Scholar
  30. Sinn, H.W. 2010. Casino capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Soros, G. 2000. Reflexivity in financial markets. In Open Society. Reforming global capitalism, ed. G. Soros, 58–90. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  32. Spaemann, R. 2008. Rousseau. Mensch oder Bürger. Das Dilemma der Moderne. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. Italian translation: 2009. Rousseau cittadino senza patria. Dalla ‘polis’ alla natura. Milano: Edizioni Ares.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università di BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations