Chinese-Singaporean Repeat Migrant Women: Transnational Positions and Social Inequalities

  • Caroline PlüssEmail author
Part of the International Perspectives on Migration book series (IPMI, volume 2)


This chapter analyzes the in-depth accounts given by 15 female Chinese-Singaporean repeat migrants—who lived again in Singapore—of their transnational biographies. Building on the idea that repeat migrants stay in different societies because of the benefits they hope they will derive from living in different places, this chapter analyzes why and how the repeat migrant women’s performances of their identifications—by reconstructing their transnational biographies—is closely linked to the outcomes of their attempts to realize their cultural, social, and economic aspiration in their transnational spaces. Cross referencing the women’s performances of their transnational positions—which are their accounts of their relations with people and institutions in the different societies in which they lived—with the outcomes of the women’s attempts to construct new and necessary cultural capital in order to access new and desired cultural, social, and economic resources; will provide new and original insight into the complex question of how and why social inequalities are or are not reproduced under increasing conditions of globalization, that is, under conditions that potentially augment the number of accepted definitions of cultural capital.


Social Capital Social Inequality Cultural Capital Economic Capital Positive Identification 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This research is funded by a Tier 1 research grant from the Academic Research Fund, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. My thanks go to all the people who made the time to participate in this study. Thanks to Vivien Won for skillfully conducting the interviews; to the NTU Sociology students for transcribing the interviews and to Sithi Hawwa for ordering the data on transnational migration trajectories. Thanks to Chan Kwok-bun and Philip Kelly for commenting on earlier versions of this chapter.


  1. Anthias, F. (2001). New hybridities, old concepts: The limits of ‘culture’. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4), 619–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borjas, G. J. (2000). Economics of migration. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences Section No. 3(4), Article No. 38.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble, feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Chan, K. B. (2005). Chinese identities, ethnicity and cosmopolitanism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Chan, K. B. (2009). Policies and strategies of Israel and Singapore to attract, develop and retain returnee talents . Hong Kong: Central Policy Unit, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.Google Scholar
  8. Christou, A., & King, R. (2006). Migrants encounter migrants in the city: The changing context of ‘home’ for second-generation Greek-American return migrants. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(4), 816–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Constable, N. (1999). At home but not at home: Filipina narratives of ambivalent returns. Cultural Anthropology, 14(2), 203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Department of Homeland Security. (2008). Yearbook of immigration statistics. Accessed September 20, 2010.
  11. Diaz, C. (2002). Conversational heuristics as a reflexive method for feminist research. International Review of Sociology, 12(2), 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dill, B. T., & Zambrana, R. E. (Eds.). (2008). Emerging intersections: Race, class, and gender in theory, policy, and practice. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Foner, N. (2007). How exceptional is New York? Migration and multiculturalism in the empire city. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 999–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giddens, A. (1991). Tribulations of the self. In A. Gidddens (Ed.), Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age (pp. 181–208). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  15. Girard, E. R., & Bauder, H. (2007). Assimilation and exclusion of foreign trained engineers in Canada: Inside a professional regulatory organization. Antipode, 39(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gmelch, G. (1992). Double passage: The lives of Caribbean migrants abroad and back home. Ann Arbour: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  17. Held, D. (Ed.). (2004). A globalizing world: Culture, economic, politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Higginbotham, E. (2009). Entering a profession: Race, gender, and class in the lives of black women attorneys. In B. T. Dill & R. E. Zambrana (Eds.), Emerging intersections: Race, class, and gender in theory, policy, and practice (pp. 22–49). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ho, E. L. E. (2008). ‘Flexible citizenship’ or familial ties that bind? Singaporean transmigrants in London. International Migration, 46(4), 145–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Iglicka, K. (1998). Are they fellow countrymen or not? The migration of ethnic poles from Kazakhstan to Poland. International Migration Review, 32(4), 995–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kivisto, P., & Hartung, E. (Eds.). (2007). Intersecting inequalities: Class, race, sex and sexualities. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
  22. Kloosterman, R., & Rath, J. (2001). Immigrant entrepreneurs in advanced economies: Mixed embeddedness further explored. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27(2), 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kong, L. (1999). Globalisation and Singaporean transmigration: Re-imagining and negotiating national identity. Political Geography, 18(5), 536–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kor, K. B. (2010, 24 November). Homegrown firms, overseas S’poreans key to progress. The Straits Times.Google Scholar
  25. Krieg, R. (2006). Gender in cross-cultural management: Women’s careers in Sino-German joint ventures. In L. Douw & K. B. Chan (Eds.), Conflict and innovation: Joint ventures in China (pp. 184–207). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  26. Lan, P. C. (2003). They have more money but I speak better english! Transnational encounters between Filipina domestics and Taiwanese employers. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 10(2), 133–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li, X. & Chew, C. (2010, 21 October). What PM Lee would have done differently … The Straits Times.Google Scholar
  28. Lutz, H., Herrera-Vivar, M. T., & Supik, L. (Eds.). (2011). Framing intersectionality: Debates on a multi-faceted concept in gender studies. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  29. Nederveen Pieterse, J. N. (1997). Globalization as hybridization. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 45–68). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Ong, A. (1999). Flexible citizenship: The cultural logics of transnationality. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Onwumechili, C., Nwosu, P. O., Jackson, R. L., II, & James-Hughes, J. (2003). In the deep valley with mountains to climb: Exploring identity and multiple reacculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(1), 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oon, C. (2008, 13 February). S’pore loses 1,000 top talents yearly: MM Lee. The Straits Times.Google Scholar
  33. Ossman, S. (2004). Emerging research: Studies in serial migration. International Migration, 42(4), 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Plüss, C. (2005). Constructing globalised ethnicity: Migrants from India in Hong Kong. International Sociology, 20(2), 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Plüss, C. (2009). Trans-national biographies and trans-national habiti: The case of Chinese Singaporeans in Hong Kong. In D. Heng, & S. M. K. Aljuned (Eds.), Reframing Singapore: Memory, identity and trans-regionalism (Selected papers from the 5th international convention of Asian scholars) (pp.195–210). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press/ICAS.Google Scholar
  36. Plüss, C. (2011). Baghdadi jews in Hong Kong: Converting cultural, social and economic capital among three transregional networks. Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs, 10(4), 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Savage, M., & Bennet, T. (2005). Editors’ introduction: Cultural capital and social inequality. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Singapore Department of Statistics. (2008). Statistics Singapore – Time series on population. Accessed January 28, 2009.
  39. Singapore Department of Statistics. (2009). Statistics Singapore – Population in brief. Accessed December 21, 2009.
  40. Weenink, D. (2008). Cosmopolitanism as a form of capital: Parents preparing their children for a globalizing world. Sociology, 42(6), 1089–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yap, M. T. (1994). Brain drain or links to the world: Views on emigrants from Singapore. Asia Pacific Migration Journal, 3(2–3), 411–429.Google Scholar
  42. Yeoh, B. A. S. (2007). Singapore: Hungry for foreign workers at all skill levels. Singapore: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  43. Yeoh, B. A. S., & Willis, K. (2005). Singaporean and British transmigrants in China and the cultural politics of ‘contact zones. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1(2), 260–284.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Sociology, School of Humanities and Social SciencesNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations