Advertisement

Social Strain and the Adaptive Behavior of Hong Kong Return Migrants

  • Chan Kwok-bunEmail author
  • Chan Wai-wan
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Migration book series (IPMI, volume 2)

Abstract

This chapter theorizes the adaptive responses of Hong Kong return migrants and their transnational and transcultural practices in terms of their behavioral patterns. Based on intersectionality analysis and Bourdieu’s convertibility of forms of capital, the chapter argues their transnational practices and relative adaptability can be explained by Durkheim’s concept of anomie and Merton’s social strain theory in the sense that failures in attempts at capital conversion would result in strain, alienation or worse, self-estrangement. Using data from indepth interviews with a sample of return migrants in Hong Kong, the chapter attempts to identify, describe, and explain the variety of behavioral patterns and modes of emotional manifestations in the adaptation of Hong Kong returnees, and to identify their individual and collective strategies of coping to help solve their problems of adjustment and integration. The chapter has broad implications and consequences for understanding millions of migrants who are living out their lives in transit, in between the societies of departure and of arrival, while being fully aware of the positive and negative impact on their lives of multiple social forces in the global social field, in intersections and mutual entanglements with each other.

Keywords

Social Capital Cultural Capital Return Migrant Chinese Migrant Migrant Transnationalism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ang, I. (2003a). Together-in-difference: Beyond diaspora, into hybridity. Asian Studies Review, 27(2), 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ang, I. (2003b). Representing social life in a conflictive global world: From diaspora to hybridity. Hong Kong Journal of Sociology, 4(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  3. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (1992). The risk society: Toward a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (1998). The cosmopolitan manifesto. New Statesman, 127(4377), 28–30.Google Scholar
  6. Benner, D. G. (Ed.). (1985). Baker encyclopedia of psychology. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House Co.Google Scholar
  7. Bhabha, H. K. (1986). Signs taken for wonders: Questions of ambivalence and authority under a tree outside Delhi, May 1817. In H. L. Gates Jr. (Ed.), Race, writing and difference (pp. 173–183). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bromley, R. (2000). Narratives for a new belonging: Diasporic cultural fictions. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Bunyan, J. (1965). In R. Sharrock (Ed.), Pilgrim’s progress. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Chan, K.B. (2002). Both sides, now: Culture contact, hybridization, and cosmopolitanism. In R. Cohen & S. Vertovec (Eds.), Conceiving cosmopolitanism (pp. 191–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chan, K.B. (2003a). Imaging/desiring cosmopolitanism. Global Change, Peace & Security, 15(2), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chan, K.B. (2003b). Inner hybridity in the city: Toward a critique of multiculturalism. Global Economic Review, 32(2), 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chan, K.B. (Ed.) (2012a). Hybrid Hong Kong. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Chan, K.B. (Ed.) (2012b). Cultural Hybridity: Contradictions and Dilemmas. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Chan, K.B, & Tong, C. K. (1993). Rethinking assimilation and ethnicity: The Chinese in Thailand. International Migration Review, xxvii(1), 140–168.Google Scholar
  18. Chan, K.B, & Tong, C. K. (1999). The many faces of Chinese identity: The Singapore experience. Ming Pao Monthly (Hong Kong), 34(9), 20–23 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  19. Constable, N. (1999). At home but not at home: Filipina narratives of ambivalent returns. Cultural Anthropology, 14(2), 203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cronin, B. (1999). Community under anarchy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Da Vanzo, J. S., & Morrison, P. A. (1981). Return and other sequences of migration in the United States. Demography, 18(1), 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. de Jong Gierveld, J., & Hagestad, G. O. (2006). Perspectives on the integration of older men and women. In J. de Jong Gierveld & G. O. Hagestad (Eds.), Social integration in later life. [Special issue]. Research on Aging: A Bimonthly on Aging and the Life Course, 28(6), 627–637.Google Scholar
  23. Deutscher, I. (2005). Preventing ethnic conflict: Successful cross-national strategies. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  24. DeVoretz, D. J., Ma, J., & Zhang, K. (2003). Triangular human capital flows: Some empirical evidence from Hong Kong. In J. G. Reitz (Ed.), Host society and the reception of immigrants (pp. 469–492). San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
  25. Durkheim, E. (1952). Suicide: A study in sociology (J. Spaulding & G. Simpson, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  26. Fong, E., Cao, X., & Chen, W. (2007). The transnational linkages of Chinese in Toronto. Unpublished paper. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  27. Giddens, A. (2006). Sociology. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gmelch, G. (1980). Return migration. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9, 135–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hall, S. (1994). Cultural identity and diaspora. In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: A reader (pp. 392–403). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hargrove, B. (1989). The sociology of religion: Classical and contemporary approaches (2nd ed.). Wheeling: Harlan Davidson, Inc.Google Scholar
  32. Hayot, E. (2006). Immigrating fictions: Unfailing mediation in dictée and becoming Madame Mao. Contemporary Literature, 47(4), 601–635.Google Scholar
  33. Hegel, G. W. F. (1967). Philosophy of right. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of the world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  36. Iredale, R., Guo, F., & Rozario, S. (2002). Introduction. In Return skilled and business migration and social transformation (pp. 1–19). Wollongong: Centre for Asia Pacific Social Transformation Studies, University of Wollongong.Google Scholar
  37. Lasch, C. (1995). The revolt of the elites and the betrayal of democracy. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  38. Lee, C. C., Pang, Z., Chan, J. M., & So, C. Y. K. (2001). Through the eyes of U.S. media: Banging the democracy drum in Hong Kong. The Journal of Communication, 51(2), 345–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Levitt, P. (2003). Transnational migration: Taking stock and future directions. Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs, 1(3), 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ley, D., & Kobayashi, A. (2005). Back to Hong Kong: Return migration or transnational Sojourn? Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs, 5(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  43. Nussbaum, M. C. (1996). For love of country. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  44. Ong, A., & Nonini, D. (Eds.). (1997). Ungrounded empire: The cultural politics of modern Chinese transnationalism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Pappenheim, F. (1959). The alienation of modern man: An interpretation based on Marx and Tonnies. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  46. Park, R. (1928). Human migration and the marginal man. American Journal of Sociology, 33(6), 881–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rapport, N., & Dawson, A. (Eds.). (1998). Migrants of identity: Perceptions of home in a world of movement. Oxford/New York: Berg Publisher.Google Scholar
  48. Salaff, J. W., Wong, S. L., & Greve, A. (2010). Hong Kong movers and stayers: Narratives of family migration. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  49. Schuetz, A. (1944). The stranger: An essay in social psychology. American Journal of Sociology, 49(6), 499–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schuetz, A. (1945). The homecomer. American Journal of Sociology, 50(5), 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sinn, E., & Wang, C. (2003). Moving continuum: Migration, remigration and the layering of identities. Unpublished paper. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  52. Sjaastad, L. A. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sussman, N. M. (2007). Identity shifts as a consequence of crossing cultures: Hong Kong Chinese migrants return home. In K.B. Chan, J. Walls, & D. Hayward (Eds.), East-west identities: Globalization, localization and hybridization (pp. 121–147). Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Takenaka, A. (1999). Transnational community and its ethnic consequences: The return migration and the transformation of ethnicity of Japanese Peruvians. The American Behavioral Scientist, 42(9), 1459–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tong, C. K., & Chan, K.B. (2001). One face, many masks: The singularity and plurality of Chinese identity. Diaspora, 10(3), 361–389.Google Scholar
  56. Tonnies, F. (1996) [1887]. Community and society (J. Samples, Trans.). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  57. Tsuda, T. (2002). Acting Brazilian in Japan: Ethnic resistance among return migrants. Ethnology, 39(1), 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Weber, M. (1905). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.) (1998), with a revised introduction by R. Collins. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishers.Google Scholar
  59. Wong, S. L., & Salaff, J. W. (1998). Network capital: Emigration from Hong Kong. The British Journal of Sociology, 49(3), 358–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Young, R. C. (1995). Colonial desire: Hybridity in theory, culture and race. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chan Institute of Social StudiesHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations