Advertisement

Class, Migration, and Identity in a Philippine Village

  • Philip F. KellyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Migration book series (IPMI, volume 2)

Abstract

This chapter explores the implications of transnational and domestic migration for class identity in a Philippine village in the province of Cavite by studying the ways in which class intersects with other social processes. It explains the village as a nexus of multiple intersections—foreign capital invested in local industrial growth; domestic migrants arriving from elsewhere in the country to work in agriculture, in industry and in homes; transnational migrants departing to join the prolific stream of Overseas Filipino Workers; and remittances sent home by such workers, as well as permanent emigrants. One implication of these motilities is the change in the meaning of class. Class would once have been defined in conventional terms relating to the structure of ownership of land and other productive assets. Elevated positions in such a class structure would in turn have enabled particular cultural expressions of distinction and processes of class reproduction. However, since the early 1990s in particular, the onset of the various human and financial flows makes class a far more complicated concept. Transnational migration and remittances facilitate new forms of consumption and performances of distinction—ones that are quite removed from those associated with traditional class identities in a rural village, and that distinctions are not simply now accessible to villagers with new-found remittance wealth—rather, the very nature of class-based distinctions has itself been reworked. Domestic migration raises the prospect of intersections between class and regional identity, as migrants from elsewhere in the Philippines are constructed as ‘others’ in relation to long-time village residents. Both forms of migration also raise questions about the intersection of class and gender.

Keywords

Gender Identity Cultural Capital Class Relation Class Position Class Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aguilar, F. V. (1999). Ritual passage and the reconstruction of selfhood in international labour migration. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 14(1), 98–139.Google Scholar
  2. Aguilar, F. V. (2009). Maalwang Buhay: Family, overseas migration, and cultures of relatedness in Barangay Paraiso. Manila: Ateneo University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Asis, M. B. (2006). The Philippines’ culture of migration. Migration information source: Country profiles. http://www.migrationinformation.org/USFocus/display.cfm?ID=364. Accessed June 29, 2010.
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Breen, R. (2005). Foundations of a Neo-Weberian class analysis. In E. O. Wright (Ed.), Approaches to class analysis (pp. 31–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Crompton, R. (1998). Class and stratification: An introduction to current debates (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Devine, F., & Savage, M. (2005). The cultural turn, sociology and class analysis. In F. Devine, M. Savage, J. Scott, & R. Crompton (Eds.), Rethinking class: Culture, identities and lifestyle (pp. 1–23). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Eder, J. (1982). Who shall succeed? Agricultural development and social inequality on a Philippine frontier. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eder, J. (1999). A generation later: Household strategies and economic change in the rural Philippines. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ferrer, M. (2007). The communist insurgency in the Philippines. In A. Tan (Ed.), A handbook of terrorism and insurgency in Southeast Asia (pp. 405–434). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  11. Gibson, K., Law, L., & McKay, D. (2001). Beyond heroes and victims: Filipina contract migrants, economic activism and class transformations. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 3(3), 365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibson, K., Cahill, A., & McKay, D. (2010). Rethinking the dynamics of rural transformation: Performing different development pathways in a Philippine municipality. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(2), 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). A postcapitalist politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gibson-Graham, J. K., Resnick, S. A., & Wolff, R. D. (Eds.). (2000). Class and its others. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gibson-Graham, J. K., Resnick, S. A., & Wolff, R. D. (Eds.). (2001a). Re/presenting class: Essays in postmodern marxism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gibson-Graham, J. K., Resnick, S. A., & Wolff, R. D. (2001b). Towards a poststructuralist political economy. In J. K. Gibson-Graham, S. Resnick, & R. Wolff (Eds.), Re/presenting class: Essays in postmodern marxism (pp. 1–22). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, G. (1989). Red revolution: Inside the Philippine guerrilla movement. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kelly, P. F. (2001). The local political economy of labour control in the Philippines. Economic Geography, 77(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelly, P. F. (2007). Filipino migration, transnationalism and class identity (Working Paper Series No. 90). Singapore: Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
  20. Kelly, P. F., & Lusis, T. (2006). Migration and the transnational habitus: Evidence from Canada and the Philippines. Environment and Planning A, 38(5), 831–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kelly, P. F., Astorga-Garcia, M., Esguerra, E. F., & The Community Alliance for Social Justice, Toronto. (2009). Explaining the deprofessionalized filipino: Why filipino immigrants get low-paying jobs in Toronto (CERIS Working Paper Series No. 75).Google Scholar
  22. Kerkvliet, B. (1977). The Huk rebellion: A study of peasant revolt in the Philippines. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kerkvliet, B. (1990). Everyday politics in the Philippines: Class and status relations in a Central Luzon village. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Levitt, P. (2001). The transnational villagers. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Miles, R. (1987). Capitalism and unfree labour: Anomaly or necessity? London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  26. NSO (National Statistics Office). (2003). 2000 census of population and housing. (NSO 2-29D, Vol. 1). Manila: National Statistics Office.Google Scholar
  27. NSO (National Statistics Office). (2004). 2002 census of agriculture: CALABARZON, Vol. 1. Manila: National Statistics Office.Google Scholar
  28. Ofreneo, R. (1980). Capitalism in Philippine agriculture. Quezon City: Foundation for Nationalist Studies.Google Scholar
  29. Payton, J. (2010). Migration, class and identity: Agricultural production in Manila’s peri-urban periphery. MA thesis, Graduate Program in Geography, York University, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  30. Pingol, A. (2001). Remaking masculinities: Identity, power, and gender dynamics in families with migrant wives and househusbands. Diliman, Quezon City: University Center for Women’s Studies, University of the Philippines.Google Scholar
  31. Rivera, T. (1994). Landlords and capitalists: Class, family, and state in Philippine manufacturing. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.Google Scholar
  32. Weyland, P. (1993). Inside the third world village. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wolters, W. (1983). Politics, patronage and class conflict in Central Luzon. The Hague: Institute of Social Studies.Google Scholar
  34. Wright, E. O. (Ed.). (2005). Approaches to class analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations