Identities and Decentered Transnational Linkages: Return Migrants in Hong Kong

  • Lucille NganEmail author
Part of the International Perspectives on Migration book series (IPMI, volume 2)


Research in the field of transnationalism has largely focused on the experience of migrants in the host country and only offhand remarks have been documented on those who have returned or moved on to a third place of residence. Underlying reasons are that return migration to a place of origin is understood to convey a sense of closure, finality, and completion of the migration journey and that the experience of migrants who have returned to their homeland is predicated to weaken their linkages with their previous host country. However, for Hong Kong Chinese migrants who emigrated prior to the 1997 handover of Hong Kong to Chinese sovereignty, return migration to Hong Kong is often another stage in a continuing journey with further movements ahead. This chapter evaluates the use of the concept of transnationalism, identifying gaps in the literature that have emerged from the applications of transnational framework in return migration research. In particular, I argue that the ways in which identifications operate for Chinese returned migrants in Hong Kong requires a multi-faceted conceptualization of transnationalisms, which encompasses a focus on the migrants’ ‘inverted’ transnational linkages.


Host Country Cultural Capital Return Migration Return Movement Chinese Migrant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2002). Population growth: Leaving Australia. Australian Social Trends 2001. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  2. Baldassar, L. (2001). Visits home: Migration experiences between Italy and Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barabantseva, E. (2005). Trans-nationalising Chineseness: Overseas Chinese policies of the PRC’s Central Government. Asien, 96, 7–28.Google Scholar
  4. Basch, L., Glick-Schiller, N., & Szanton-Blanc, C. (1994). Nations unbound: Transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation- states. Luxembourg: Gordon and Breach Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Bedford, R., Ho, E., & Lidgard, J. (2000). International migration in New Zealand: Context, components and policy issues. Population center studies discussion. Paper No 37. The University of Waikato.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Broaded, C. M. (1993). China’s response to the brain drain. Comparative Education Review, 37(3), 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cerase, F. (1974). Migration and social change: Expectations and reality: A study of return migration from the United States to Italy. International Migration Review, 8(2), 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chan, K. B. (2005). Adaptation of refugees. In K-b Chan (Ed.), Migration, ethnic relations and Chinese business (pp. 85–97). Oxon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Chan, K. B. (2011). Hybridity: Promises and limits. Toronto: de Sitter Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Chan, K. B. & Chan, W. W. (2009). Innovators or strangers at home? Return migrants in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Central Policy Unit, The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.Google Scholar
  12. Chan, K. B., & Chan, W. W. (2010). The return of the native. World Futures, 66(6), 398–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Choi, C. Y. (1975). Chinese migration and settlement in Australia. Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Clifford, J. (1994). Diasporas. Cultural Anthropology, 9(3), 302–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, R. (1997). Global diasporas: An introduction. Seattle: University of Washington Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crissman, L. (1991). Chinese immigrant families in Australia: A variety of experiences. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 22(1), 25–37.Google Scholar
  17. Dunn, K. M., & Ip, D. (2008). Putting transnationalism in context: Comparing Hong Kong Chinese-Australians in Sydney and Brisbane. Australian Geographer, 39(1), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Faist, T. (1997). The crucial meso-level. In T. Hammar, C. Brochmann, K. Tamas, & T. Faist (Eds.), International migration, immobility and development: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 187–218). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  19. Fouron, G. E., & Glick-Schiller, N. (2002). The generation of identity: Redefining the second generation within a transnational social field. In P. Levitt & M. C. Waters (Eds.), The changing face of home: The transnational lives of the second generation (pp. 168–210). New York: Russell Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  20. Gamlen, A. (2008). Why engage diaspora? ESRC Center On Migration, Policy And Society Working Paper No. 63. The University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Glick Schiller, N., Basch, L., & Szanton-Blanc, C. (1992). Towards a transnational perspective on migration: Race, class, ethnicity, and nationalism reconsidered. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  22. Gmelch, G. (1980). Return migration. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9, 135–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hepeng, J. (2005). China offers research grant to overseas Chinese. Science and Development Network, April 21, 2005. Accessed December 03, 2009.
  24. Hewitt Associates. (2007). China expatriate salary increase rate is on the rise in 2007. Hewitt Associates Newsroom, December 5, Accessed July 20, 2009.
  25. Ho, E. S., Bedford, R. D., & Goodwin, J. E. (1997), ‘Astronaut’ families: A contemporary migration phenomenon. In W. Friesen et al. (Ed.), East Asian New Zealanders: Research on new migrants, New Zealand migration research network, Paper No 3 (pp. 20–41). Albany: Aotearoa/Massey University.Google Scholar
  26. Holdworth, M. (2002). Foreign devils: Expatriates in Hong Kong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hugo, G. (2003). Australia’s diaspora: Its size, nature and policy implications. Melbourne: Committee for Economic Development of Australia.Google Scholar
  28. Ip, M. (2002). Chinese female migration: From exclusion to transnationalism. In L. A. Fraser & K. Pickles (Eds.), Shifting centres: Women and migration in New Zealand history (pp. 149–166). Otago: Otago University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Iredale, R., Guo, F., & Rozario, S. (Eds.). (2002). Returned skilled and business migration and social transformation. Report to the Ford Foundation, APMRN, University of Wollongong.Google Scholar
  30. Iredale, R., Guo, F., & Rozario, S. (Eds.). (2003). Return migration in the Asia Pacific. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  31. Kee, P., & Skeldon, R. (1994). The migration and settlement of Hong Kong Chinese in Australia. In R. Skeldon (Ed.), Reluctant exiles? Migration from Hong Kong and the New Overseas Chinese (pp. 183–196). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kelly, P., & Lusis, T. (2006). Migration and the transnational habitus: Evidence from Canada and the Philippines. Environment and Planning A, 38(5), 831–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. King, R. (1986). Return migration and regional economic problems. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  34. Kwong, P. C. K. (1990). Emigration and manpower shortage. In R. Y. C. Wong & J. Y. S. Cheng (Eds.), The other Hong Kong report 1990 (pp. 297–338). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Levitt, P. (2002). The ties that change: Relations to the ancestral home over the life cycle. In P. Levitt & M. C. Waters (Eds.), The changing face of home: The transnational lives of the second generation (pp. 123–144). New York: Russell Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  36. Levitt, P. (2003). Transnational migration: Taking stock and future directions. Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs, 1(3), 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ley, D., & Kobayashi, A. (2005). Back to Hong Kong: Return migration or transnational sojourn? Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs, 5(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Luo, K., Guo, F., & Huang, P. (2003). China: Government policies and emerging trends of reversal of the brain drain. In R. Iredale, F. Guo, & S. Rozario (Eds.), Return migration in the Asia Pacific (pp. 88–111). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  39. Ma, L. J. C. (2003). Space, place and transnationalism in the Chinese diaspora. In L. J. C. Ma & C. Cartier (Eds.), Chinese diaspora: Space, place, mobility and identity (pp. 1–50). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Mak, A. S. (1993). Pre-departure concerns of prospective migrants from Hong Kong to Australia. Occasional Paper No. 20, Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  41. Meerwald, A. M. L. (2001). Chineseness at the crossroads. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 4(4), 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ngan, L. (2008a). Generational identities through time: Memories and homelands of the ABCs. In A. Davidson & K. E. Kuah-Pearce (Eds.), At home in the Chinese diaspora: Memories, identity and belonging (pp. 74–93). Houndmills/Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Ngan, L. (2008b). Living in-between: Hybrid identities among long-established Australian-born Chinese in Sydney. Chinese Southern Diaspora Studies Journal, 2(1), 127–135.Google Scholar
  44. Ong, A. (1999). Flexible citizenship: The cultural logics of transnationality. Durham/London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Ongley, P., & Pearson, D. (1995). International migration: New Zealand, Australia and Canada compared. International Migration Review, 29(3), 765–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Park, R. E. (1928). Human migration and the marginal man. The American Journal of Sociology, 33(6), 881–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pe-Pua, R., Mitchell, C., Castles, S., & Iredale, R. (1996). Astronaut families and parachute children: The cycle of migration between Hong Kong and Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  48. Portes, A., Guarnizo, L. E., & Landolt, P. (1999). The study of transnationalism: Pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rapport, N., & Dawson, A. (Eds.). (1998). Migrants of identity: Perceptions of home in a world of movement. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  50. Ryan, J. (2002). Chinese women as transnational migrants: Gender and class in global migration narratives. International Migration, 40(2), 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Salaff, J. W., Shik, A., & Greve, A. (2008). Like sons and daughters of Hong Kong: The return of the young generation. The China Review, 8(1), 31–57.Google Scholar
  52. Salaff, J. W., Wong, S. L., & Greve, A. (2010). Hong Kong movers and stayers: Narratives of family migration. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  53. Schuetz, A. (1945). The homecomer. The American Journal of Sociology, 50(5), 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simmel, G. (1950). The stranger. In K. Wolff (Ed.), The Sociology of George Simmel (Trans.) (pp. 402–408). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  55. Sinatti, G. (2010). ‘Mobile transmigrants’ or ‘unsettled returnees’? Myth of return and permanent resettlement among Senegalese migrants. Population, Space and Place, special issue ‘Onward and Ongoing Migration’. doi:  10.1002/psp.608.
  56. Skeldon, R. (1990). Emigration and the future of Hong Kong. Pacific Affairs, 63(4), 503–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Skeldon, R. (Ed.). (1994). Reluctant exiles? Migration from Hong Kong and the New Overseas Chinese. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  58. Skeldon, R. (1995a). Australia, Hong Kong and 1997: The population connection. People and Place, 3(2), 9–15.Google Scholar
  59. Skeldon, R. (1995b). Emigration from Hong Kong: Tendencies and impacts. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Stonequist, E. V. (1935). The problem of the marginal man. The American Journal of Sociology, 41(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sussman, N. M. (2011). Return migration and identity: A global phenomenon, a Hong Kong case. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Tsay, C. L. & Lin, J. P. (2003). Return migration and reversal of brain drain to Taiwan: An analysis of the 1990 census data. In R. R. Iredale, C. Hawksley, & S. Castles (Eds.), Migration in the Asia Pacific: Population, settlement, and citizenship issues (pp. 273–292). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  63. Vertovec, S. (1999). Conceiving and researching transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang, F. L. (2005). Organising through division and exclusion: China’s Hukou system. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Waters, J. L. (2005). Transnational family strategies and education in the contemporary Chinese diaspora. Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs, 5(4), 359–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Westwood, S., & Phizacklea, A. (Eds.). (2000). Transnationalism and the politics of belonging. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Wong, S. L. (1992). Emigration and stability in Hong Kong. Asian Survey, 32(10), 918–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wong, S. L., & Salaff, J. W. (1998). Network capital: Emigration from Hong Kong. The British Journal of Sociology, 49(3), 358–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School, The Hong Kong Institute of EducationHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations