Skip to main content

The Development of Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Insect Conservation: Past, Present and Prospects

Abstract

The Rio Earth Summit in 1992 was an international landmark in commitment to biodiversity – a new term that the politicians readily accepted to mean all organisms, including the tiny and obscure. The resulting Biodiversity Convention was a major breakthrough for invertebrate conservation. It radically reduced the time and energy needed to convince others that invertebrates were worthy of conservation attention; now bugs were ‘wildlife’ as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander K, Archer M, Colenutt S, Denton J, Falk S, Godfrey A, Hammond P, Ismay J, Lee P, Macadam C, Morris M, Murray C, Plant C, Ramsay A, Schulten B, Shardlow M, Stewart A, Stubbs A, Sutton P, Telfer M, Wallace I, Willing M, Wright R (2005) Managing priority habitats for invertebrates, 2nd edn. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • All of a Buzz in the Thames Gateway reports and papers 2006–2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J, Harvey P, Jones RA (2006) All of a buzz in the Thames gateway. Phase 1: identification of the Brownfield resource in the Thames gateway and preliminary assessment of the invertebrate interest. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust and English Nature, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RA (2007) Brachymeria obtusata (Forster, 1859) (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae), new to Britain. Entomol Mon Mag 143:153–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RA (2008a) Brachymeria tibialis (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae), confirmed as a British Species. Br J Entomol Nat Hist 21:1623.1–1623.4

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RA (2008b) Caught in the greenwash: what future for invertebrate conservation on the Brownfield sites of the Thames Gateway. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (2002) Memorandum by the Invertebrate Conservation Trust. In what on Earth? The threat to the science underpinning conservation. House of Lords: Select Committee on Science and Technology: Evidence. Session 2001-02. HMSO, 170pp. (pp 27–29)

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (2004) Marsh award for insect conservation – Alan Stubbs. Antenna 28:152–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Bairner SZ, Macadam CR (2011) Brownfield biodiversity in Falkirk. Forth Naturalist and Historian 34:5–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates AJ, Sadler JP, Henshall SE, Hannah DM (2009) Ecology and conservation of arthropods of exposed riverine sediments (ERS). Terr Arthropod Rev 2(22):77–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Biodiversity: The UK Steering Group Report (1995a) Volume 1: meeting the Rio challenge. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Biodiversity: The UK Steering Group Report (1995b) Volume 2: action plans. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks SJ (ed) (1997) Unity of purpose for invertebrate conservation: maintaining the biodiversity of British invertebrates. Proceedings of the 1st JCCBI Conference, Peterborough, 24th February 1996, 48pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks SJ, Nellist D (eds) (1998) How to give invertebrates a higher profile in conservation. Proceedings of the 2nd JCCBI Conference, Peterborough, 27th September 1997, 74pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce-White C, Shardlow M (2011) A review of the impact of artificial light on invertebrates. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Buglife (2008) Assessing brownfield biodiversity. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Buglife (2009) Planning for brownfield biodiversity – a best practice guide. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheesman OD (ed) (2004) Unity of purpose for invertebrate conservation: launch of the Invertebrate Conservation Trust. Proceedings of the 3rd Invertebrate Link (JCCBI) Conference, Peterborough, 31st March, 2001, 49pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Clubiona rosserae reports 2002–2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Shardlow M (2002) Conserving Rosser’s sac-spider (Clubiona rosserae) and developing fenland habitat management – The Clubiona rosserae Partnership (CrP). Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Anglian Water, British Arachnological Society and English Nature, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Colenutt S (2003a) Clubiona rosserae initial surveys of potential sites. The Clubiona rosserae Partnership. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Colenutt S (2003b) Report on findings of the 2002–2003 field survey for Rosser’s Sac Spider Clubiona rosserae. The Clubiona rosserae Partnership. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Colenutt S (2003c) Review of the current known biology and distribution of Rosser’s Sac Spider Clubiona rosserae. The Clubiona rosserae Partnership. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Colenutt S (2005) Report on findings of the 2003–2004 field survey for Rosser’s Sac Spider Clubiona rosserae. The Clubiona rosserae Partnership. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Colenutt S (2006) Report on findings of the 2005 field survey for Rosser’s Sac Spider Clubiona rosserae. The Clubiona rosserae Partnership. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Colenutt S (2007) Report on findings of the 2006 field survey for Rosser’s Sac Spider Clubiona rosserae. The Clubiona rosserae Partnership. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill A (2010) Water trapping to sample Clubiona rosserae and other invertebrates at Lakenheath Fen Sept – Oct 2010. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor DW, Breen J, Champion A, Gilliland PM, Huggett D, Johnston C, Dd’A L, Lieberknecht L, Lumb C, Ramsay K, Shardlow M (2002) Rationale and criteria for the identification of nationally important marine nature conservation features and areas in the UK. JNCC, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Convey P, Key RS, Key RJD (2010) The establishment of a new ecological guild of pollinating insects on sub-Antarctic South Georgia. Antarct Sci 22:508–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defra (2011) Biodiversity 2020: a strategy for England’s wildlife and ecosystem services. Defra, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment (1994) Biodiversity: the UK action plan. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake M (2011) Upper Thurne Catchment grazing marsh ditches 1973 to 2009. Final report. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake CM, Stewart NF, Palmer MA, Kindemba VL (2010) The ecological status of ditch systems: an investigation into the current status of the aquatic invertebrate and plant communities of grazing marsh ditch systems in England and Wales. Technical report. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll RJ (2007) A biography of Ditch surveys in England and Wales. Part 1: Surveys 1878 – 1999. Technical report. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Audit Committee (2008) Halting biodiversity loss. Thirteenth report of session 2007–08 report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence. House of Commons, London. Buglife written and oral evidence, pp ev41–ev59

    Google Scholar 

  • ERS (Exposed River Sediments) reports and papers 2007–2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey A (2007) The distribution of Rhabdomastix laeta populations. Final report. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake CM, Godfrey A, Hewitt SM, Parker J (2007) Fly assemblages of sandy exposed riverine sediment. Final report. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake CM (2007a) Rhaphium suave (Loew) (Diptera, Dolichopodidae) new to Britain. Dipt Dig 14:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake CM (2007b) Hilara tenella (Fallén, 1816) (Diptera, Empididae) new to Britain and the Channel Islands. Dipt Dig 14:5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake CM (2007c) Hilara aartseni Chvála, 1997 (Diptera, Empididae) new to Britain. Dipt Dig 14:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt SM, Parker J (2008) Distribution of the stiletto-fly Cliorismia rustica on Cheshire rivers. Environment Agency and Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt SM, Parker J (2009a) Impact of gravel extraction on ERS invertebrate communities on the River Eden in 2008 – pilot study. Environment Agency and Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt SM, Parker J (2009b) ERS invertebrate habitat survey of the rivers Eden in Cumbria and Irwell in Lancashire. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt SM, Parker J, Kindemba V (2010) ERS invertebrate habitat survey of the rivers Afon Ystwyth and Afon Rheidol in Ceredigion. CCW and Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindemba V (2011) Discovering the rich dipteran fauna of exposed riverine sediments. Br J Entomol Nat Hist 24:23–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre MD, Luff ML (2002) The use of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in conservation assessments of exposed riverine sediment habitats in Scotland and northern England. J Insect Conserv 6:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyre MD, Lott DA, Luff ML (2001) The rove beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) of exposed ­riverine sediments in Scotland and northern England: habitat classification and conservation aspects. J Insect Conserv 5:173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox R, Conrad KF, Parsons MS, Warren MS, Woiwod IP (2006) The state of Britain’s larger moths. Butterfly Conservation and Rothamsted Research, Wareham/Dorset

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry R, Lonsdale D (eds) (1991) Habitat conservation for insects – a neglected green issue. Amateur Entomologists’ Society, Middlesex

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson CWD (1998) Brownfield: red data – the values artificial habitats have for uncommon invertebrates. English Nature, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey A, Middlebrook I (2007) Invertebrates associated with coarse woody debris in streams and rivers in Britain. Br Wildl 18:178–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey PR (2000) The east Thames corridor: a nationally important invertebrate fauna under threat. Br Wildl 12(2):91–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Henshall SE (2011) The influence of exposed riverine sediment (ERS) physical habitat dynamics and river flow in determining the distributions of specialist ERS invertebrates. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Henshall SE, Sadler JP, Hannah DM, Bates AJ (2011) The role of microhabitat and food availability in determining riparian invertebrate distributions on gravel bars: a habitat manipulation experiment. Ecohydrol 4:512–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt SM, Parker J (2005) Craneflies of the genus Lipsothrix Loew (Diptera, Limoniidae) in Cumbria. Dipt Dig 12:151–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill SLL (2006a) The ecology and conservation in Britain of Lophopus crystallinus, a Rare Freshwater Bryozoan. Ph.D. Thesis, Reading University

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill SLL (2006b) Report on the survey of Lophopus crystallinus in Britain during 2005–06. Action for Invertebrates Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill S (2011) Report on debris sampling survey for evidence of the presence of Lophopus crystallinus within the River Wye. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdich DM, Palmer M, Sibley PJ (2009) The indigenous status of Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet) in Britain. In: Brickland J, Holdich DM, Imhoff EM (eds) Crayfish conservation in the British Isles. Proceedings of a conference held on 25th March 2009 in Leeds, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Jukes A (2009) Chalcosyrphus eunotus a Red Data Book hoverfly, its status, distribution, ecology and conservation. Report for: Staffordshire Wildlife Trust, Stafford

    Google Scholar 

  • Key RS, Key RJD (2009) Survey for baseline information on introduced plants & invertebrates South Georgia 24th December 2008 – 6th February 2009 – Invertebrates. First interim report (version 1.3) – May 2009. Report from Buglife to RSPB for the South Atlantic Invasive Species Project

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindemba V (2009) The impact of Neonicotinoid insecticides on bumblebees, Honey Bees and other non-target invertebrates. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindemba V, Whitehouse A (2009) Using GIS to identify and prioritize regional ark sites for white-clawed crayfish: aggregate and mineral extraction sites in South-west England. In: Brickland J, Holdich DM, Imhoff EM (eds) Crayfish conservation in the British Isles. Proceedings of a conference held on 25th March 2009 in Leeds, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindemba V, Whitehouse AT, Peay S (2009) Using GIS to prioritise and identify regional Ark sites for White-clawed crayfish: South West aggregate and mineral extraction sites. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay RA (2004a) Aucheninnes Moss: a field assessment. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay RA (2004b) Response to SNH comments on Aucheninnes Moss: a field assessment. University of East London and Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Macadam C (2008) Bugs and beavers, Letter. Br Wildl 20:149–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Macadam CR, Bairner SZ (in press) Brownfields – oases of urban biodiversity. Glasgow Naturalist

    Google Scholar 

  • Macadam CR, Rotheray GE (2009) A strategy for Scottish invertebrate conservation. Prepared by the Initiative for Scottish Invertebrates. Published by Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Stirling

    Google Scholar 

  • Macadam C, Shardlow M (2009) Quality assurance of UKBAP invertebrate signposts. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Mott N (2006) Managing woody debris in rivers, streams and floodplains. Staffordshire Wildlife Trust, Stafford

    Google Scholar 

  • NERC (2011) Developing a National Strategy in Taxonomy & Systematics. NERC

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Drake CM, Stewart NF (2010) A manual for the survey and evaluation of the aquatic plant and invertebrate assemblages of grazing marsh ditch systems. Version 4. Technical report. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Peay S, Kindemba V, Attwood F, Christmas M (2011) A toolkit for developing catchment-scale conservation strategy for White-clawed crayfish. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott T, Stubbs A (2009) Scottish Lepidoptera associated with Aspen. In: Parrott J, MacKenzie N (eds) Aspen in Scotland: biodiversity and management. Highland Aspen Group

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J (2005) Revitalising the biodiversity action plan process. Antenna 29:208–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell-Smith A (2010) Conserving the Midas tree-weaver spider (Midia midas): survey and research in Epping Forest. British Arachnological Society/Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, London/Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler JP, Bell D, Fowles A (2004) The hydroecological controls and conservation value of beetles on exposed riverine sediments in England and Wales. Biol Conserv 118:41–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Science and Technology Committee (2008) Systematics and taxonomy: follow-up report with evidence. 5th Report of Session 2007–08. House of Lords, London. Buglife written evidence, pp 221–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Shardlow M (2006a) Is nature conservation natural? ECOS 27(1):2–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Shardlow M (2006b) Sheep dip banned to save rivers. Pestic News 72:3–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Shardlow M (2007) New biodiversity priorities – a route to wildlife recovery. ECOS 28(2):28–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Shardlow M (2008a) Brownfields as refuges. Wings – Essays on Invertebrate Conservation, pp 19–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Shardlow M (2008b) Defending the bugs of West Thurrock marshes. Atropos 35:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Shardlow M (2009) UK slow to implement protection of the little whirlpool ramshorn snail (Anisus vorticulus). Tentacle 17:18–19

    Google Scholar 

  • SRC (Soft Rock Cliffs) reports and paper 2006–2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Telfer MG (2006a) Invertebrate survey of the soft rock cliffs of Norfolk. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Telfer MG (2006b) Invertebrate survey of the soft rock cliffs of Yorkshire. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright I, Whitehouse A (2006) Kessingland coast survey of aculeate Hymenoptera. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunnisett J, Edwards B (2006) A survey of invertebrates and vegetation at selected soft rock cliff sites in Dorset. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Colenutt S, Wright A (2006) Ecological surveys of the Isle of Wight Chines 2005: invertebrate surveys. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Colenutt S (2007b) Ecological surveys of the Isle of Wight Chines 2005: vegetation surveys. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Colenutt S, Wright A (2007) Ecological surveys of the Southwest Isle of Wight undercliffs 2006–2007: invertebrate surveys. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright I (2007) Corton, Suffolk – a survey of aculeate Hymenoptera. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust

    Google Scholar 

  • Telfer MG, Gibbs DJ (2007) Invertebrate survey of the soft-rock cliffs in Co. Durham, Sunderland and South Tyneside. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse AT (2007a) Managing coastal soft cliffs for invertebrates – summary report. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse AT (2007b) Managing coastal soft cliffs for invertebrates – technical report. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse AT (2007c) Over the edge – taking local action on soft cliffs. In Practice, no.55, March 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe M, Whitehouse A, Knight G (2008) Life on the edge – key coastal soft cliffs for invertebrates in England and Wales. Br Wildl 19:172–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Telfer MG, Shardlow MEA (2009) Lathrobium angustatum Boisduval & Lacordaire (Staphylinidae) new to East Anglia. Coleopterist 18:110

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs AE (2002) Buglife: birth of the Invertebrate Conservation Trust. Wings (Spring): 17–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs AE (2010a) The ever changing Diptera fauna of the British Isles. In: Chandler PJ (ed) A dipterists handbook, vol 15, 2nd edn, The amateur entomologist. Amateur Entomologists’ Society, Orpington, pp 520–525, 525pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs A (2010b) Flies, beetles and bees, wasps and ants (Diptera, Coleoptera, and Aculeate Hymenoptera). In: MacLean N (ed) Silent summer: the state of wildlife in Britain and Ireland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse AT (2008) Managing aggregate sites for invertebrates – a best practice guide. Buglife– The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse A (2009) Bringing aggregates sites to life. Conserv Land Manag 7(1):8–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse AT, Peay S, Kindemba V (2009) Ark sites for white-clawed crayfish – guidance for the aggregates industry. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams N (2006) Road to oblivion. Curr Biol 16:617–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright FJ, Galbraith CA, Bendall R (1993) Action for biodiversity in the UK. May 1993 seminar report. JNCC, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne G, Avery M, Campbell L, Gubbay S, Hawkswell S, Juniper T, King M, Newbery P, Smart J, Steel C, Stones T, Stubbs A, Taylor J, Tydema C, Wynde R (1993) The biodiversity challenge: an agenda for conservation action in the UK. RSPB, Sandy

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne G, Avery M, Campbell L, Gubbay S, Hawkswell S, Juniper T, King M, Newbery P, Smart J, Steel C, Stones T, Stubbs A, Taylor J, Tydeman C, Wynde R (1995) Biodiversity challenge, 2nd edn. RSPB, Sandy

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Margaret Palmer, Jamie Roberts, Craig Macadam, Andrew Whitehouse, Sarah Henshall, Vicky Kindemba, Tim New and Roger Bendall for comments on this chapter, and of course thank you to all staff, trustees, volunteers, members, member organisations and everyone else who has contributed to Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matt Shardlow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix – Buglife Member Organisations 2011

Appendix – Buglife Member Organisations 2011

Amateur Entomologists’ Society

Badenoch and Strathspey Conservation Group

Balfour-Browne Club

Bees, Wasps and Ants Recording Society

Biological Recording in Scotland (BRISC)

British Arachnological Society

British Dragonfly Society

British Entomological & Natural History Society

British Myriapod and Isopod Group

Bumblebee Conservation Trust

Butterfly Conservation

Central Association of Bee-Keepers

Conchological Society of Great Britain & Ireland

Derbyshire & Nottinghamshire Entomological Society

Dipterists Forum

Edinburgh Entomological Club

Flora Locale

Grasslands Trust

Lancashire and Cheshire Entomological Society

People’s Trust for Endangered Species

Plantlife

Pond Conservation

Royal Entomological Society

Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB)

Staffordshire Invertebrate Group

Sussex Biodiversity Records Centre

Watford Coleopterist Group

Wildlife Trusts

Wild Trout Trust

Yorkshire Naturalists Union

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stubbs, A., Shardlow, M. (2012). The Development of Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust. In: New, T. (eds) Insect Conservation: Past, Present and Prospects. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2963-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics