Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Benign Meningioma: Significance and Therapeutic Potential

Chapter
Part of the Tumors of the Central Nervous System book series (TCNS, volume 7)

Abstract

This review elucidates the value and the therapeutic spectrum of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for benign meningiomas based on results obtained at our department. Between April 1992 and May 2008 38.8% (394/1,016 patients) of patients with benign meningioma underwent primary single session GKRS. Staged GKRS was performed in 20 patients with large critically located meningiomas, 14 of whom having undergone surgery at least once. The patients’ age ranged between 26 and 73 years (median 60.5). For single session GKRS median tumor volume was 6.5 cm3, median prescription dose at the tumor margin (covered by a median isodose of 45%) was 12 Gy. Median tumor volume treated by staged GKRS measured 33.3 cm3 and median treatment volume 19.0 cm3. For 41 treatments, the median prescription dose at the tumor margin was 12 Gy. Median follow-up for staged GKRS was 9.4 years.

For single treatment GKRS, the actuarial progression-free survival rate was 98.5% at 5 years and 97.2% at 10 years at a (mostly temporary) complication rate of 4.5%. In patients undergoing staged GKRS, primary tumor control was achieved in 90%. Two patients (10%) with tumor progression outlying the planning target volumes experienced tumor control after an additional radiosurgical procedure. Clinically, 45% of all patients improved within the time of follow-up, 55% remained unchanged. Radiosurgery is a neurosurgical domain that offers results comparing favorably to radical surgery for meningiomas of small to medium-size in critical locations. For larger critically located meningiomas, a combination of judicious surgery and radiosurgery yields the best functional outcome. Staged GKRS provides a substantial therapeutic improvement for large otherwise untreatable meningiomas.

Keywords

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Cranial Nerve Deficit Benign Meningioma Simpson Grade Skull Base Meningioma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ms E. Meier for preparation of the manuscript.

References

  1. Barnett GH, Linskey ME, Adler JR, Cozzens JW, Friedman WA, Heilbrun MP, Lunsford LD, Schulder M, Sloan AE, The American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons Washington Committee Stereotactic Radiosurgery Task Force (2007) Stereotactic radiosurgery – an organized neurosurgery-sanctioned definition. J Neurosurg 106:1–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chang JH, Chang JW, Choi JY, Park YG, Chung SS (2003) Complications after gamma knife radiosurgery for benign meningiomas. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:226–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cho DY, Tsao M, Lee WY, Chang CS (2006) Socioeconomic costs of open surgery and gamma knife radiosurgery for benign cranial base tumors. Neurosurgery 58:866–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christensen HC, Kosteljanetz M, Johansen C (2003) Incidence of gliomas and meningiomas in Denmark, 1943 to 1997. Neurosurgery 52:1327–1334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Claus EB, Bondy ML, Schildkraut JM, Wiemels JL, Wrensch M, Black PM (2005) Epidemiology of intracranial meningioma. Neurosurgery 57:1088–1095PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Condra KS, Buatti JM, Mendenhall WM, Friedman WA, Marcus RB Jr, Rhoton AL (1997) Benign meningiomas: primary treatment selection affects survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 39:427–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Couldwell WT, Kan P, Liu JK, Apfelbaum RI (2006) Decompression of cavernous sinus meningioma for preservation and improvement of cranial nerve function. J Neurosurg 105:148–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Couldwell WT, Cole CD, Al-Mefty O (2007) Patterns of skull base meningioma progression after failed radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 106:30–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Jesús O, Sekhar LN, Parikh HK, Wright DC, Wagner DP (1996) Long-term follow-up of patients with meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus: recurrence, progression, and quality of life. Neurosurgery 39:915–920PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DiBiase SJ, Kwok Y, Yovino S, Arena C, Naqvi S, Temple R, Regine WF, Amin P, Guo C, Chin LS (2004) Factors predicting local tumor control after gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for benign intracranial meningiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60:1515–1519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flickinger JC (1989) An integrated logistic formula for prediction of complications from radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17:879–885PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hasegawa T, Kida Y, Yoshimoto M, Koike J, Iizuka H, Ishii D (2007) Long-term outcomes of gamma knife surgery for cavernous sinus meningioma. J Neurosurg 107:745–751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haselsberger K, Maier T, Dominikus K, Holl H, Kurschel S, Ofner-Kopeinig P, Unger F (2009) Staged gamma knife radiosurgery for large critically located benign meningiomas: evaluation of a series comprising 20 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 80:1172–1175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Nakajima H (2001) Two-staged gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of large petroclival and cavernous sinus meningiomas. Surg Neurol 56:308–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ketter R, Rahnenführer J, Henn W, Kim YJ, Feiden W, Steudel WI, Zang ZD, Urbschat S (2008) Correspondence of tumor localization with tumor recurrence and cytogenetic progression in meningiomas. Neurosurgery 62:61–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kleihues P, Burger PC, Scheithauer BW (1993) The new WHO classification of brain tumours. Brain Pathol 3:255–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kollová A, Liščák R, Novotný J Jr, Vladyka V, Šimonová G, Janoušková L (2007) Gamma knife surgery for benign meningioma. J Neurosurg 107:325–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD (2008a) The principles of skull base radiosurgery. Neurosurg Focus 24:E11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kondziolka D, Mathieu D, Lunsford LD, Martin JJ, Madhok R, Niranjan AM, Flickinger JC (2008b) Radiosurgery as definitive management of intracranial meningiomas. Neurosurgery 62:53–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kotapka MJ, Kalia KK, Martinez AJ, Sekhar LN (1994) Infiltration of the carotid artery by cavernous sinus meningioma. J Neurosurg 81:252–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kreil W, Luggin J, Fuchs I, Weigl V, Eustacchio S, Papaefthymiou G (2005) Long term experience of gamma knife radiosurgery for benign skull base meningiomas. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:1425–1430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Larson JJ, van Loveren HR, Balko G, Tew JM Jr (1995) Evidence of meningioma infiltration into cranial nerves: clinical implications for cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg 83:596–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee JYK, Niranjan A, McInerney J, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD (2002) Stereotactic radiosurgery providing long-term tumor control of cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg 97:65–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leksell L (1951) The stereotaxic method and radiosurgery of the brain. Acta Chir Scand 102:3316–3319Google Scholar
  25. Little KM, Friedman AH, Sampson JH, Wanibuchi M, Fukushima T (2005) Surgical management of petroclival meningiomas: defining resection goals based on risk of neurological morbidity and tumor recurrence rates in 137 patients. Neurosurgery 56:546–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mantle RE, Lach B, Delgado MR, Baeesa S, Bélanger G (1999) Predicting the probability of meningioma recurrence based on the quantity of peritumoral brain edema on computerized tomography scanning. J Neurosurg 91:375–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maruyama K, Shin M, Kurita H, Kawahara N, Morita A, Kirino T (2004) Proposed treatment strategy for cavernous sinus meningiomas: a prospective study. Neurosurgery 55:1068–1075PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mathiesen T, Gerlich A, Kihlström L, Svensson M, Bagger-Sjöbäck D (2007) Effects of using combined transpetrosal surgical approaches to treat petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery 60:982–991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Metellus P, Regis J, Muracciole X, Fuentes S, Dufour H, Nanni I, Chinot O, Martin P, Grisoli F (2005) Evaluation of fractionated radiotherapy and gamma knife radiosurgery in cavernous sinus meningiomas: treatment surgery. Neurosurgery 57:873–886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Natarajan SK, Sekhar LN, Schessel D, Morita A (2007) Petroclival meningiomas: multimodality treatment and outcomes at long-term follow-up. Neurosurgery 60:965–981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pendl G, Unger F, Papaefthymiou G, Eustacchio S (2000) Staged radiosurgical treatment for large benign cerebral lesions. J Neurosurg 93(Suppl 3):107–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Pfisterer WK, Hendricks WP, Scheck AC, Nieman RA, Birkner TH, Krampla WW, Preul MC (2007) Fluorescent in situ hybridization and ex vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic examinations of meningioma tumor tissue: is it possible to identify a clinically-aggressive subset of benign meningiomas? Neurosurgery 62:1048–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sacko O, Sesay M, Roux F-E, Riem T, Grenier B, Liguoro D, Loiseau H (2007) Intracranial meningioma surgery in the ninth decade of life. Neurosurgery 61:950–954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simpson D (1957) The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20:22–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sindou MP, Alaywan M (1998) Most intracranial meningiomas are not cleavable tumors: anatomic-surgical evidence and angiographic predictability. Neurosurgery 42:476–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryMedical University GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations