Advertisement

Mediation Models, Theories and Approaches

  • Jan Marie Fritz
  • Jan Marie Fritz
Chapter
Part of the Clinical Sociology: Research and Practice book series (CSRP)

Abstract

This chapter identifies some of the major approaches used by professional mediators – working independently or in teams – in the United States. It also identifies some of the theoretical underpinnings of those approaches, identifies models that can be used by those with different approaches, provides a rationale for understanding the approaches and includes some information about mediation in other countries.

Keywords

Social Theory Social Exchange Cognitive Neuroscience Social Conflict Mediation Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexander, N. (2008). The mediation metamodel: Understanding practice. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 26(1), 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali, A., Mowry, R., & Ho, K. (2011). Collective action and emancipatory aims: Applying principles of feminist practice in a shelter for domestic violence survivors with disabilities. In B. F. Waxman Fiduccia (Ed.), Papers on women and girls with disabilities 2011. Retrieved from http://www.centerwomenpolicy.org/programs/wammanfiduccia/documents/BFWFP_CollectiveActionandEmancipatoryAims-ApplyingPrinciplesofFeministPracticeinaShelter_000.pdf
  3. Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Oxford: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bateson, G. (1954). A theory of play and fantasy. Psychiatric Research Reports, 2, 39–51.Google Scholar
  6. Beer, J. E. (1997). The mediator’s handbook. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Black, A. (2001). Alternative dispute resolution in Brunei-Darussalam: The blending of imported and traditional processes. Bond Law Review, 13(2), 1–29. Retrieved from http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr/vol13/iss2/4/
  8. Brennan, W. (1998). Aggression and violence: Examining the theories. Nursing Standard, 12(27), 36–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bush, R., & Folger, J. (2004). The promise of mediation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Cognitive Neuroscience Society. (2011). Welcome page. Retrieved from http://cogneurosociety.org
  11. Della Noce, D. J., Bush, R. A., & Folger, J. P. (2002). Clarifying the theoretical underpinnings of mediation: Implications for practice and policy. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, 3(1), 39–65.Google Scholar
  12. Dewulf, A., Gray, B., Putnam, L., Lewicki, R., Arts, N., Bouwen, R., & van Woerkum, C. (2009). Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A met-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations, 62(2), 155–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dollard, J. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven: Yale University Press for the Institute of Human Relations.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fritz, J. M. (2002). Teaching sociological practice: Starting with something special. Sociological Practice, 4(2), 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fritz, J. M. (2004). Derriere la magie: Models, approaches et theories de mediation (Behind the magic: Mediation models, approaches and theories). Esprit Critique, 6(3). Retrieved from http://www.espritcritique.org
  16. Fritz, J. M. (2006). L’approccio al conflitto: il ruolo della teoria nella mediazione (Approaches to conflict: The role of theory in mediation). In L. Luison (Ed.), La mediazone come strumento di intervento sociale (Mediation as an instrument of social intervention) (pp. 24–36). Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
  17. Gabel, S. (2003). Mediation and psychotherapy: Two sides of the same coin? Negotiation Journal, 19(4), 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garland-Thomson, R. (2003). Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory. National Women’s Studies Association Journal, 14(3), 1–32.Google Scholar
  19. Glass, J. F. (Ed.). (1972). Humanistic society: Today’s challenge to sociology. Pacific Palisades: Goodyear.Google Scholar
  20. Glass, J., & Staude, J. R. (1972). The humanistic challenge to sociology. In J. F. Glass (Ed.), Humanistic society: Today’s challenge to sociology (pp. 1–12). Pacific Palisades: Goodyear.Google Scholar
  21. Harding, S. (2004). The feminist standpoint theory reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Haynes, J. M. (1994). The fundamentals of family mediation. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  23. Klages, M. (2003). Postmodernism. Retrieved from http://www.colorado.edu/English/ENGL2012Klages/pomo.html
  24. Kurtz, P. (2000). Humanist manifesto 2000: A call for a new planetary humanism. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  25. Lang, M. D., & Taylor, A. (2000). The making of a mediator: Developing artistry in practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Lascoux, J. (2001). Pratique de la mediation: Une methode alternative a la resolution des conflicts. Issy-les-Moulineaux: ESF editeur.Google Scholar
  27. Leopold, A. (1949). A sand county almanac and sketches here and there. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lorenz, K. (1996). Keynote: Innate bases of learning. In K. H. Pribram & J. King (Eds.), Learning as self-organization (pp. 1–56). Mahwah: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  29. Mays, J. M. (2006). Feminist disability theory: Domestic violence against women with a disability. Disability & Society, 21, 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211–277). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  31. Moore, C. W. (2003). The mediation process. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Moore, C. W., & Woodrow, P. J. (2010). Facilitation and mediation. In C. W. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of global and multicultural negotiation (pp. 407–433). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  33. Morineau, J. (1998). L’esprit de la mediation. Ramonville Saint-Agne: Editions Eres.Google Scholar
  34. Ritzer, G. (2000). Modern sociological theory. Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  35. Schellenberg, J. A. (1996). Conflict resolution: Theory, research and practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  36. Society for Neuroscience. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.sfn.org/index.aspx?pagename=whatIsNeuroscience
  37. Straus, R. A. (2002). Using sociology: An introduction from the applied and clinical perspectives (3rd ed.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  38. Sweet, W. (2004). Herbert Spencer (1820–1903). In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/spencer
  39. Taylor, A. (2002). The handbook of family dispute resolution. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Turner, J. H. (2001). Sociological theory today. In H. T. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 1–17). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  41. Van Wyhe, J. (2002). The complete work of Charles Darwin online. Retrieved from http://darwin-online.org.uk/
  42. Vraneski, A. (2004). Al di la dell’arte e della scienza (Beyond art or science). In L. Luison & J. M. Fritz (Eds.), La mediazone come strumento di intervento sociale (Mediation as an instrument of social intervention). Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
  43. Wan, A. H., & Wan, P. M. (2008). Clinical sociology and community mediation: Training grassroots leaders in multiethnic Malaysian communities. In J. M. Fritz (Ed.), International clinical sociology (pp. 208–227). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wendell, S. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of disability. Hypatia, 4(2), 104–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wennerstrom, E. (2000). Address by the director for international relations, Ministry of Justice, Sweden. Social Mediation and New Methods of Conflict Resolution in Daily Life. In: Proceedings of the seminar organized by the Interministerial Delegation for Urban Affairs under the French Presidency of the European Union-Oisin Program, Paris-Creteil, 21-22-23 Sept 2000. Paris: Les editions de la DIV.Google Scholar
  46. Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Winslade, J. (2006). Mediation with a focus on discursive positioning. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 23(4), 501–515. doi: 10.1002/crq.152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Winslade, J., & Monk, G. (2000). Narrative mediation: A new approach to conflict resolution. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  49. Winslade, J., & Monk, G. (2002). A narrative approach in mediation. Retrieved from http://narrative-mediation.crinfo.org/docuemnts/mini-grants/narrative_mediation/Context_narrative_mediation.pdf
  50. Winslade, J., Monk, G., & Cotter, A. (1998). A narrative approach to the practice of mediation. Negotiation Journal, 14(1), 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zaki, J., Hennigan, K., Weber, J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2010). Social cognitive conflict resolution: Contributions of domain-general and domain-specific neural systems. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(25), 8481–8488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Centre for Sociological ResearchUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations