Skip to main content

Creativity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Clinical Sociology: Research and Practice ((CSRP))

Abstract

This chapter defines creativity. It also discusses the conditions that foster creativity and the extent to which creativity is part of mediation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to West and Richter (2008, p. 215), “Creativity can be seen as the development of new ideas, while innovation implementation is the application of those new ideas in practice.” Using this distinction, it follows that creativity is a necessary prerequisite for innovation. Mann (2011, p. 255) notes that “creativity and innovation are central to thinking and planning for national change and transformation, productivity and performance and social and economic success.”

  2. 2.

    According to Dyer et al. (2011, p. 21), “creative ideas spring from behavioral skills (that individuals) can acquire to catalyze innovative ideas in (themselves) and in others.”

  3. 3.

    According to Bilton (2007, p. 23), “creativity theory has demonstrated a growing skepticism towards individual trait-based models of creativity of the type propounded in the 1960s. Behaviourist models are criticized for ignoring external conditions.”

  4. 4.

    Brainstorming is a group technique “in which group members freely and spontaneously present ideas, in a positive environment in which critical or negative thinking is suspended” (Prather 2010, p. 33).

  5. 5.

    A ladder is drawn and an abstract/general concept is written at the top of the ladder and, by asking how something will be done, the group can move down the ladder to specific actions (Prather 2010, pp. 35–36).

  6. 6.

    Mann (2011, p. 257) says, however, “that attempts to ‘teach’ creativity as a set of generic rules and principles (‘think outside the box’) and techniques (e.g., ‘do some brainstorming) is irrelevant for genuine creativity but may be useful as a tool for ‘everyday creativity’, i.e. routine problem-solving.”

  7. 7.

    Abramson and Moore, who run community conferences but are not mediators, write about the creative outcomes in the conferencing process they use with schools in their chapter in this volume. They also indicate that they do not think of mediation as a creative process.

  8. 8.

    According to Mann (2011, p. 257), “Creativity is fundamentally domain specific: creative people are very rarely creative across a range of fields and domains. They are bright, motivated people who are creative through immersion and deep knowledge in a particular domain. This highlights the importance of in-depth knowledge in a domain to be creative.”

  9. 9.

    If a mediator is working with an organization that is going to put a mediation program in place or redesign a program, it is easier for the company representative to see that creativity needs to be part of the program design when it is part of the definition of the field.

  10. 10.

    In 2011, the Burning Man event was a featured part of an exhibit about the living frontiers of architecture at Louisiana, the Danish museum of modern art. The exhibit curator, Kjeld Kjeldsen (telephone interview. November 22, 2011) had never been to Burning Man, but an artist, in 2006, had told him about his contribution to the event. Burning Man was described in the exhibit catalog (Louisiana 2011, p. 24) as a place “of alternative dwellings and vehicles that reflect all sorts of utopian ideas of a different world.”

  11. 11.

    The booth was a tent (enclosed on three sides to provide some shade and protection from blowing sand) with three folding chairs. Over the entrance was a large sign that said “Fighting With Anyone? Help & advice here.” Kelly (telephone interview. September 9, 2011) said he really doesn’t give advice, “but that is OK on the sign.” At the side of the tent entrance was a smaller sign: “The Mediator is in.” (Sheppard 2010).

  12. 12.

    In this quote, there are quotes and comments that appear in parenthesis and italics. These points either appear elsewhere in the Hedeen and Kelly (2009) article or were mentioned by Kelly in the telephone interview on September 9, 2011.

  13. 13.

    There is the possibility that the more mediation organizations or groups of mediators call attention to all these issues, that courts might simply decide to rename the process they use as something other than mediation.

References

  • Adair, J. (2007). Leadership for innovation (3rd ed.). London/Philadelphia: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., & Mueller, J. S. (2008). Studying creativity, its processes, and its antecedents: An exploration of the componential theory of creativity. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 33–64). New York/London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilton, C. (2007). Management and creativity: From creative industries to creative management. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilton, C., & Cummings, S. (2010). Creative strategy: Reconnecting business and innovation. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A., & Cropley, D. (2009). Fostering creativity: A diagnostic approach for higher education and organisations. Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J., Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C. M. (2011). The innovator’s DNA: Mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerardi, D. (2001). Developing creativity and intuition for resolving conflicts: The magic of improvisation. Retrieved from http://www.mediate.com//articles/geradi.cfm

  • Gilson, L. L. (2008). Why be creative: A review of the practical outcomes associated with creativity at the individual, group and organizational levels. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 303–322). New York/London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, S. B., & Shaw, M. L. (2010). The past, present, and future of mediation as seen through the eyes of some of its founders. Negotiation Journal, 26(2), 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedeen, T., & Kelly, R. (2009). Practice note: Challenging conventions in challenging conditions: Thirty-minute mediations at Burning Man. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 27(1), 107–119. doi:10.1002/crq.250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hon, A. (2011). When competency-based pay relates to creative performance: The moderating role of employee psychological need. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(1), 130–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louisiana Museum of Modern Art. (2011). Living: Exhibit (June 1 – October 2, 2011) catalog. Humlebæk: Louisiana

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, L. (2011). Creativity and innovation: Principles and policy implications. In L. Mann & J. Chan (Eds.), Creativity and innovation in business and beyond: Social science perspectives and policy implications (pp. 254–269). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, B. (2004). Beyond neutrality: Confronting the crisis in conflict resolution. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillis, D. (1997). Community mediation programs: Developments and challenges. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, S. (2011, May). Obstacles to creativity in mediation. Retrieved from http://stevemehta.wordpress.com/2011/05/18/obstacles-to-creativity-in-mediation/

  • Parnes, S. J., Noller, R. B., & Biondi, A. M. (1977). Guide to creative action. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prather, C. (2010). Manager’s guide to fostering innovation and creativity in teams. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, G., & Wilson, J. (Eds.). (2007). Tourism, creativity and development. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1986). Divergent thinking and creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46(2), 375–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 243–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Okuda, S. M. (1988). Problem discovery, divergent thinking, and the creative process. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17(3), 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., & Zhou, J. (2008). Organizational creativity research: A historical overview. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 3–31). New York/London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, Bob (2010). Mediating at Burning Man, 2010: Getting to the authentic core and finding freedom. Retrieved from http://sheppardlaw.com/rjs_m.htm

  • Taylor, C. W. (1964). Widening horizons in creativity. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. (2007). What a great idea! 2.0: Unlocking your creativity in business and in life. New York: Sterling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treffinger, D. J. (1986). Research on creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 15–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, K. L., & Clegg, C. W. (2010). Why do employees undertake creative action? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 77–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vraneski, A. (2006). Al di là dell’arte e della scienza: Cultra e creativita nella mediazione. (Beyond art or science: Creativity and culture in interactive mediation). In L. Luison (ed), La Mediazione come strumento di intervento sociale (pp. 58–80). Milano: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A., & Richter, A. W. (2008). Climates and cultures for innovation and creativity at work. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 211–261). New York/London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Marie Fritz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fritz, J.M., Fritz, J.M. (2014). Creativity. In: Fritz, J. (eds) Moving Toward a Just Peace. Clinical Sociology: Research and Practice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2885-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics