Intersectional-Gender and the Locationality of Women “in Transit”

Part of the International Perspectives on Migration book series (IPMI, volume 1)


The chapter analyzes the privileges and power within feminist scholarship as a crucial issue for gender and migration studies. The starting point is that when feminism defines itself from the Western perspective, excluding any other vision of gender equality, other women’s point of views are inevitably silenced and negated. Since the 1980s, this asymmetry of power has created many divides within feminism and posed Third-world/black women against West/white women. This chapter challenges the West vs. Third-world binarism within feminist theory and the related dichotomy that opposes gender equality to cultural difference by representing feminism as a multicentered and multifaceted theory.

“Multicentered feminism” is described as a theoretical frame that incorporates the perspectives of women from the margins and underlines the interrelatedness of the different social categories that together create women’s subordination. Intersectionality is embraced as an approach to address the complex locationality of women who stake at the crossroad of interconnecting conditions of subordination. As a response to a long tradition of essentialism within feminist and race scholarship, the intersectionality approach focuses on the subjects that fall in-between the fixed and isolated categories used to examine social life. Intersectionality addresses the ways in which the structures of race, class, and gender shape women’s lives and influence their behavior. Since gender is a transversal but not a transcultural condition, it must be analyzed through the intersectional approach in order to avoid ethnocentric essentialization. Thinking about gender as connected, inter- and intra-acting with all the other social conditions, gender is conceived as inherently constituted and simultaneously shaped by race/ethnicity, culture/religion, and educational/occupational levels. The concept of “intersectional-gender” is proposed as an analytical category useful to conceptualize the formation and transformation of gender identities of women “in transit” whose locationality is extremely complex for their moving across different nation-states and communities and belonging to several groups at the same time.


Black Woman Gender Identity Gender Equality Feminist Theory Muslim Woman 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abbas, T. (Ed.). (2005). Muslim Britain: Communities under pressure. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, L. (1992). Women and gender in Islam: Historical roots of a modern debate. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alarcón, N. (1990). The theoretical subject(s) of this bridge called my back and Anglo-American feminism. In G. Anzaldúa (Ed.), Making face, making soul/haciendo caras: Creative and critical perspectives by women of color (pp. 356–369). San Francisco: Aunt Lute Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. Alcoff, L. (1988). Cultural feminism versus poststructuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs, 13(3), 417–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ang-Lygate, M. (1996). Women who move: Experiences of diaspora. In M. Maynard & J. Purvis (Eds.), New frontiers in women’s studies: Knowledge, identity, and nationalism (pp. 151–163). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  6. Anthias, F. (2002). Beyond feminism and multiculturalism: Locating difference and the politics of location. Women’s Studies International Forum, 25(3), 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baca Zinn, M., & Thornton Dill, B. (2003). Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism. In C. McCann & K. Seung-Kyung (Eds.), Feminist theory reader: Local and global perspectives (pp. 353–363). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bell, L. (1983). Vision of women. Clifton: Humana Press.Google Scholar
  9. Benhabib, S. (1995). Feminism and postmodernism: An uneasy alliance. In S. Benhabib, J. Butler, D. Cornell, & N. Fraser (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange (pp. 17–34). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Benhabib, S. (2004). The rights of others: Aliens, residents, and citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bordo, S. (1990). Feminism, postmodernism, and gender-skepticism. In L. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 133–157). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Brah, A. (1996). Cartographies of diaspora: Contesting identities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Brah, A., & Phoenix, A. (2004). Ain’t I a woman? Revisiting intersectionality. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 5(3), 75–86.Google Scholar
  14. Braidotti, R. (2003). The return of the masters’ narratives. Accessed March 19, 2010.
  15. Bunch, C. (1990). Women’s rights as human rights: Towards a re-vision of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 12(4), 486–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Butler, J. (1994). Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of “postmodernism.”. In S. Benhabib, J. Butler, D. Cornell, & N. Fraser (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange (pp. 35–57). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, J., Nussbaum, M., & Howard, M. (Eds.). (1999). Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Combahee River Collective. (1986). Combahee river collective statement. Black feminist organizing in the seventies and eighties (1977). Albany: Women of Color PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 14, 139–167.Google Scholar
  21. Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality in transatlantic perspective. In C. Klinger & A. Knapp (Eds.), ÜberKreuzungen. Fremdheit, ungleichheit, differenz (pp. 19–35). Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  22. Davis, A., & Martínez, E. (1994). Coalition building among people of color. Inscriptions, 7, 42–53.Google Scholar
  23. Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: The Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  24. Dietz, M. (2003). Current controversies in feminist theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 399–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Droogsma, R. (2007). Redefining hijab: American Muslim women’s standpoints on veiling. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35(3), 294–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. English, J. (1977). Justice between generations. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 31(2), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fernea, E. (1998). In search of Islamic feminism: One woman’s global journey. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  28. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  29. Fraser, N. (1995). False antithesis. In S. Benhabib, J. Butler, D. Cornell, & N. Fraser (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange (pp. 59–74). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Freedman, J. (2007). Women, Islam and rights in Europe: Beyond a universalist/culturalist dichotomy. Review of International Studies, 33, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frye, M. (1983). The politics of reality: Essay in feminist theory. Berkeley: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
  32. Grande, E. (2004). Hegemonic human rights and African resistance: Female circumcision in a broader comparative perspective. Global Jurist Frontiers, 4(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
  33. Green, K. (1986). Rawls, women and the priority of liberty. Australasian Journal of Philosophy Supplement, 64, 26–36.Google Scholar
  34. Harris, A. (1990). Race and essentialism in feminist legal theory. Stanford Law Review, 42(3), 581–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Henkel, H. (2009). Are Muslim women in Europe threatening the secular public sphere? Social Anthropology, 17(4), 471–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hill Collins, P. (1998). Fighting words: Black women and the search for justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hill Collins, P. (2000). Gender, black feminism, and black political economy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 568, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. hooks, b. (1990). Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  39. Jaggar, A. (1983). Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa: Rowman & Allanheld.Google Scholar
  40. Joppke, C. (2009). Limits of integration policy: Britain and her Muslim. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(3), 453–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jouili, J. (2009). Negotiating secular boundaries: Pious micro-practices of Muslim women in French and German public spheres. Social Anthropology, 17(4), 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kearns, D. (1983). A theory of justice and love: Rawls on the family. Australian Journal of Political Science, 8(1), 36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kejanlioğlu, B., & Taş, O. (2009). Regimes of un/veiling and body control: Turkish students wearing wigs. Social Anthropology, 17(4), 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kennedy, E., & Mendus, S. (Eds.). (1987). Women in western political philosophy: Kant to Nietzsche. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  45. La Barbera, M. C. (2007). Una reflexión crítica a través del pensamiento de Susan Okin sobre género y justicia. Cuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho, 16, 1–15. Accessed June 1, 2011.
  46. La Barbera, M. C. (2009). Intersectionalgender. Thinking about gender and cultural difference in the global society. Global Studies Journal, 2(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
  47. La Barbera, M. C. (2010). Género y diversidad entre mujeres. Cuadernos Koré. Revista de historia y pensamiento de género, 1(2), 55–72. Accessed June 1, 2011.
  48. Lazreg, M. (1988). Feminism and difference: The perils of writings as a woman on women in Algeria. Feminist Studies, 14(1), 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lloyd, S. (1995). Situating a feminist criticism of John Rawls’s political liberalism. Loyola L.A. Law Review, 28(4), 1319–1344.Google Scholar
  50. Lorde, A. (1982). Zami: A new spelling of my name. Watertown: Persephone Press.Google Scholar
  51. Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Trumansburg: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
  52. MacKinnon, C. (1983). Feminism, Marxism, method and state: Toward feminist jurisprudence. Signs, 8(4), 635–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. MacKinnon, C. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  54. MacKinnon, C. (2000). Points against postmodernism. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 75(3), 687–712.Google Scholar
  55. Mani, L. (1987). Contentious traditions: The debate on sati in colonial India. Cultural Critique, 7, 119–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Matsuda, M. (1986). Liberal jurisprudence and abstracted visions of human nature: A feminist critique of Rawls’ theory of justice. New Mexico Law Review, 16, 613–630.Google Scholar
  57. Matsuda, M. (1991). Beside my sister, facing the enemy: Legal theory out of coalition. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1183–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McClain, L. (1992). Atomistic man revisited: Liberalism, connection and feminist jurisprudence. Southern California Law Review, 65(3), 1171–1264.Google Scholar
  59. McGoldrick, D. (2006). Human rights and religion: The Islamic headscarf debate in Europe. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. Minow, M. (1988). Feminist reason: Getting it and losing it. Journal of Legal Education, 38, 47–60.Google Scholar
  61. Minow, M. (1990). Making all the differences: Inclusion, exclusion and American law. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Modood, T., Triandafyllidou, A., & Zapata-Barrero, R. (Eds.). (2006). Multiculturalism, Muslims and citizenship: A European approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Mohanty, C. (1988). Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourse. Feminist Review, 30, 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mohanty, C. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Moors, A., & Salih, R. (2009). “Muslim women” in Europe: Secular normativities, bodily performances and multiple publics. Social Anthropology, 17(4), 375–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Narayan, U. (1997). Dislocating cultures: Identities, traditions, and third-world feminism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Narayan, U. (2000). Essence of culture and a sense of history: A feminist critique of cultural essentialism. In U. Narayan & S. Harding (Eds.), Decentering the center: Philosophy for a multicultural, postcolonial, and feminist world (pp. 80–100). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Nicholson, L. (1992). Feminism and the politics of postmodernism. Boundary, 19(2), 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nicholson, L. (1994). Interpreting gender. Signs, 20, 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Book.Google Scholar
  72. Okin, S. (1979). Women in western political thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Okin, S. (1989). Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  74. Okin, S. (1994). Political liberalism, justice, and gender. Ethics, 105(1), 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Okin, S. (1999). Is multiculturalism bad for women? In J. Cohen, M. C. Nussbaum, & M. Howard (Eds.), Is multiculturalism bad for women? (pp. 7–24). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Okin, S. (2000). Feminism, women’s human rights, and cultural difference. In U. Narayan & S. Harding (Eds.), Decentering the center: Philosophy for a multicultural, postcolonial and feminist world (pp. 26–46). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Olsen, F. (1985). The myth of state intervention in the family. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 18(4), 835–864.Google Scholar
  78. Pateman, C. (1983). Feminist critiques of the public/private dichotomy. In S. Benn & G. Gaus (Eds.), Public and private in social life (pp. 281–303). New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  79. Phillips, A. (2007). Multiculturalism without culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Rao, A. (1995). The politics of gender and culture in international human rights discourse. In J. Peters & A. Wolper (Eds.), Women’s rights, human rights: International feminist perspective (pp. 167–175). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Rich, A. (1986). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution [1976]. London: Virago.Google Scholar
  83. Sandikci, O., & Ger, G. (2010). Veiling in style: How does a stigmatized practice become fashionable? Journal of Consumer Research, 37(1), 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sandoval, C. (1991). US third world feminism: The theory and method of oppositional consciousness in the postmodern world. Genders, 10, 1–24.Google Scholar
  85. Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  86. Schutte, O. (2000). Cultural alterity: Cross-cultural communication and feminist theory in North-South contexts. In U. Narayan & S. Harding (Eds.), Decentering the center: Philosophy for a multicultural, postcolonial and feminist world (pp. 47–66). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. The American Historical Review, 91, 1053–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Scott, J. W. (1988). Deconstructing equality-versus-difference: Or, the uses of poststructuralist theory for feminism. Feminist Studies, 14(1), 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Scott, J. W. (1998). “La Querelle Des Femmes” in the late twentieth century. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 9, 70–90.Google Scholar
  90. Scott, J. W. (2007). The politics of veil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Scruton, R. (2002). The west and the rest: Globalization and the terrorist threat. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  92. Shachar, A. (2001). Multicultural jurisdictions: Cultural differences and women’s rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Shaheed, F. (1995). Networking for change: The role of women’s groups in initiating dialogue on women’s issues. In M. Afkhami (Ed.), Faith and freedom: Women’s human rights in the Muslim world (pp. 78–103). Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Song, S. (2007). Justice, gender, and the politics of multiculturalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Spelman, E. (1988). Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  96. Spivak, C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  97. Sunder, M. (2002). Cultural dissent. Stanford Law Review, 54, 495–567.Google Scholar
  98. Volpp, L. (2001). Feminism versus multiculturalism. Columbia Law Review, 101, 1181–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  100. Winter, B. (2008). The hijab & the republic: Uncovering the French headscarf debate. New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Yegenoglu, M. (1998). Colonial fantasies: Towards a feminist reading of orientalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Young, I. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Political and Constitutional StudiesMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations