Advertisement

Learning Instruments: Baroque Music Gets Game

  • Jennifer Jenson
  • Suzanne de Castell
  • Nicholas Taylor
  • Milena Droumeva
  • Stephanie Fisher
Chapter

Abstract

In the context of diminishing opportunities for music learning in formal education, our team of educational researchers was given the opportunity to create a learning game for the Tafelmusik Baroque Orchestra in Toronto, Canada. In this chapter, we document the design and play-testing of a Flash-based Baroque music game, Tafelkids: The Quest for Arundo Donax, focusing on the tensions that arose between the directive to include historical facts about Baroque music and culture on one hand and, on the other, the need to produce opportunities for pleasurable play for an audience aged 8–14. We begin by setting out the concept of “ludic epistemology” in order to situate our design efforts within an emerging pedagogical paradigm, and we review key instances in our design process where we encountered this tension between two very different notions about the relationship of play to learning. Similar tensions arose in our play-testing sessions with over 150 students. We conclude with a discussion of the particular challenges for this educational game in enacting a bridge from propositions to play, digitally remediating a traditional approach to Baroque music education to address the broader epistemological question of what and how we come to know through play.

Keywords

Educational Game Digital Game Musical Piece Play Session Musical Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the patronage and generous expertise of the Tafelmusik Baroque Orchestra Society and the work of student designers, programmers, and artists: Andrew, Ben, Catherine, Davoud, Peter, and Tahereh. The Tafelmusik game is free and can be accessed at http://www.tafelmusik.org/education/webgame.htm (accessed 17 March 2011).

References

Bibliography

  1. Brown, A. L. (1991). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex intervention in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design of science education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de Castell, S., & Jenson, J. (2003). Serious play. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(6), 649–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Castell, S., Bryson, M., & Jenson, J. (2002). Object lessons: Towards an educational theory of technology. First Monday, 7(1). http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_1/castell/. Accessed 1 Jan 2010.
  5. de Castell, S., Jenson, J., & Taylor, N. (2007). Digital games for education: When meanings play. In A. Baba (Ed.), Situated play: Proceedings of the DiGRA 2007 conference (pp. 590–599). Japan: Japax. http://www.digra.org/dl/db/07312.45210.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2011.
  6. Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2004). Principles of instructional design (5th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Huizinga, J. (1960). Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in Culture. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ito, M. (2005). Mobilizing fun in the production and consumption of children’s software. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597(1), 82–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jenson, J., & de Castell, S. (2008). Theorizing gender and digital gameplay: Oversights, accidents and surprises. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 2(1), 15–25. http://www.eludamos.org/index.php/eludamos.Google Scholar
  10. Jenson, J., & Taylor, N. (2006). (D)evaluating pedagogic interactivity: The case of ELSE. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2006 (pp. 2835–2840). Chesapeake: AACE.Google Scholar
  11. Jenson, J., & Taylor, N. (2007). “Lego storyboard”: Building digital stories. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of the world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, health care, and higher education 2007. Chesapeake: AACE.Google Scholar
  12. Jenson, J., Taylor, N., & de Castell, S. (2007). Shifting design values: A playful approach to serious content. E-learning, 4(4), 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kafai, Y. B. (2006). Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games and Culture, 1(1), 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom culture. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mateas, M., & Stern, A. (2005). Build it to understand it: Ludology meets narratology in game design space. In S. de Castell & J. Jenson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Digital Games Research Association (DiGRA) Conference. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University Press. http://www.digra.org/dl/db/06278.41489.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2011.
  18. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  19. Noble, D. F. (1998). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. First Monday, 3(1). http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_1/noble/. Accessed 1 Jan 2010.
  20. Poole, S. (2000). Trigger happy: Videogames and the entertainment revolution. New York: Arcade.Google Scholar
  21. Prensky, M. (2006). “Don’t bother me Mom – I’m learning!” how computer and video games are preparing your kids for 21st century success and how you can help! St. Paul: Paragon House.Google Scholar
  22. Rieber, L. P. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Truax, B. (2001). Acoustic communication (2nd ed.). Westport: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar

Gameography

  1. Dance Dance Revolution. (1998). Konami (Dev.); Disney, Keen, Konami & Nintendo (Pub.).Google Scholar
  2. Flash Flash Revolution. (2002). FlashFlashRevolution Inc. (Dev./Pub.).Google Scholar
  3. Guitar Hero. (2005). Harmonix (Dev.); Red Octane (Pub.).Google Scholar
  4. Nodame Cantibile (Nintendo DS version). (2007). Namco Bandai (Pub.).Google Scholar
  5. Osu!Tatakae!Ouendan!. (2005). Keichi Yano (Dev.); Nintendo (Pub.).Google Scholar
  6. Rock Band (Xbox 360). (2007). Harmonix (Dev.); MTV Games/Electronic Arts (Pub.).Google Scholar
  7. StepMania. (2005). StepMania (Dev./Pub.).Google Scholar
  8. Tafelkids: The Quest for Arundo Donax. (2009). de Castell, S. et al. (Dev.); Tafelmusik Baroque Orchestra (Pub.).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Jenson
    • 1
  • Suzanne de Castell
    • 2
  • Nicholas Taylor
    • 1
  • Milena Droumeva
    • 2
  • Stephanie Fisher
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations