Advertisement

The False Promise of Regional Organisations?

  • Rodrigo TavaresEmail author
Chapter
Part of the United Nations University Series on Regionalism book series (UNSR, volume 3)

Abstract

In 1994, in his landmark article ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, John Mearsheimer reviewed liberal institutionalism, collective security and critical theory to evaluate whether the claim that institutions cause peace is convincing. He concludes that it is not – ‘institutions have minimal influence on state behaviour, and thus hold little promise for promoting stability in the post-Cold War world’ (1994/1995: 7). Realism reigned supreme. Although I will not attempt to engage with Mearsheimer’s theory, I am nonetheless sympathetic to his attempt to critically review standard canons in international relations.

Keywords

United Nations Security Council Regional Organisation Conflict Management Task Sharing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adibe, C. E. (1997). The Liberian conflict and the ECOWAS-UN partnership. Third World Quarterly, 18(3), 471–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alagappa, M., & Inoguchi, T. (Eds.). (1999). International security management and the United Nations. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Annan, K. (2006). A regional-global security partnership: Challenges and opportunities (Report of the Secretary General. A/61/204 – S/2006/590). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  4. Ayoob, M. (1995). The third world security predicament: State making, regional conflict, and the international system. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  5. Berman, E. (1998). The security council’s increasing reliance on burden-sharing: Collaboration or abrogation? International Peacekeeping, 4(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boulden, J. (Ed.). (2003). Dealing with conflict in Africa: The United Nations and regional organizations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Boutros-Ghali, B. (1995). Report of the Secretary General: Supplement to an agenda for peace (Document A/50/60 – S/1995/1). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  8. Capie, D. (2008). Localization as resistance: The contested diffusion of small arms norms in Southeast Asia. Security Dialogue, 39(6), 637–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diehl, P. F. (2003). Regional conflict management: Strategies, necessary conditions, and comparative effectiveness. In F. P. Diehl & J. Lepgold (Eds.), Regional conflict management (pp. 41–77). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  10. Diehl, P. F., & Lepgold, J. (2003). Regional conflict management. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  11. Goulding, M. (2003). Peacemonger. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Graham, K., & Felício, T. (2006). Regional security and global governance: A study of interactions between regional agencies and the UN Security Council with a proposal for a regional-global security mechanism. Brussels: VUB Brussels University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hansen, H. E., McLaughlin, M. S., & Nemeth, S. C. (2008). IO mediation of interstate conflicts: Moving beyond the global versus regional dichotomy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(2), 295–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hettne, B., & Söderbaum, F. (2006). The UN and regional organizations in global security: Competing or complementary logics? Global Governance, 12, 227–232.Google Scholar
  15. High Level Panel of the Audit of the African Union. (2007). Audit of the African Union. Addis Ababa: African Union.Google Scholar
  16. International Peace Academy. (2006). Building partnerships for crisis prevention, conflict resolution and peace-building between the United Nations and regional organizations. New York: International Peace Academy.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, D. M., & Smith, M. L. R. (2007). Making process, not progress: ASEAN and the evolving East Asian regional order. International Security, 32(1), 148–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kelly, R. (2007). Security theory in the “new regionalism”. International Studies Review, 9, 197–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lake, D., & Morgan, P. (1997). Regional orders: Building security in a new world. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Martin, I. (2003). Is the regionalization of peace operations desirable? In M. Pugh & W. P. Singh Sidhu (Eds.), The United Nations and regional security: Europe and beyond. Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  21. Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994/1995). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Merlingen, M. (2008). Everything is dangerous: A critique of ‘normative power Europe’. Security Dialogue, 38(4), 435–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meyer, A. (2009). Regional peace operations in Central Africa: FOMUC’s limited security contribution and new expectations on MICOPAX. African Security, 2(2–3), 158–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Murithi, T. (2009). IGAD on the ground: Comparing interventions in Sudan and Somalia. African Security, 2(2), 136–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Obi, C. (2009). ECOWAS on the ground: Comparing peacekeeping in Liberia, Sierra Leone, Guinea-Bissau and Cote D’Ivoire. African Security, 2(2), 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pugh, M., & Singh Sidhu, W. P. (2003). The United Nations and regional security. Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  27. Tavares, R. (2009). Regional security: The capacity of international organizations. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Weiss, T. G. (Ed.). (1998). Beyond UN subcontracting: Task-sharing with regional security arrangements and service-providing NGOs. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.United Nations University Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies (UNU-CRIS)BrugesBelgium

Personalised recommendations