Abstract
What if we could equip the next generation with the capacity to adapt to a changing world? Isn’t it our responsibility to give them the ability to face local and global environmental challenges and improve, or at least maintain, the quality of life that many of us presently enjoy? Communities will need the ability to quickly and effectively adapt, or risk diminished lives or even collapse. This chapter will suggest that education should be about giving our kids “earth smarts,” a kind of street smarts writ large. Earth smarts is an educational construct, a tool that can help policymakers, educators, and researchers. Synthesized from a wide range of research and thought on environmental literacy and related concepts, it highlights our considerable capacity to meet challenges and will be a useful tool for anyone who believes that education can play a crucial role in preparing individuals and communities to creatively and justly adapt to environmental challenges. Freely available in a variety of formats, earth smarts was designed to be open, flexible, and practical – policymakers, researchers, and educators from around the world are encouraged to shape it to their own cultural and environmental contexts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alsop, S. (Ed.). (2005). Beyond Cartesian dualism: Encountering affect in the teaching and learning of science (1st ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.
Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Blockstein, D. E., & Greene, J. (2003). Recommendations for education for a sustainable and secure future. Washington, DC: National Council for Science and the Environment (NCSE).
Bowers, C. A. (2008). Why a critical pedagogy of place is an oxymoron. Environmental Education Research, 14(3), 325–335. doi:10.1080/13504620802156470.
Code, L. (2006). Ecological thinking: The politics of epistemic location. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crumley, C. L. (2007). Historical ecology: Integrated thinking at multiple temporal and spatial scales. In A. Hornborg & C. L. Crumley (Eds.), The world system and the earth system: Global socioenvironmental change and sustainability since the Neolithic (pp. 15–28). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Daly, H. E., & Farley, J. (2010). Ecological economics: Principles and applications (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Diamond, J. M. (2005). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Viking.
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00501001.x.
Earth Charter Initiative. (2000). The earth charter. Retrieved from http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/2000/10/the_earth_charter.html
Gabriel, N. (1996). Teach our teachers well: Strategies to integrate environmental education into teacher education programs. Boston: Second Nature. Retrieved from http://www.secondnature.org/history/writings/articles/totw.htm
Godemann, J. (2008). Knowledge integration: A key challenge for transdisciplinary cooperation. Environmental Education Research, 14(6), 625–641.
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Lo, K., Lea, D., & Medina-Elizade, M. (2006). Global temperature change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(39), 14288–14293. doi:10.1073/pnas.0606291103.
Hathaway, M., & Boff, L. (2009). The Tao of liberation: Exploring the ecology of transformation. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.
Jordan, R., Singer, F., Vaughan, J., & Berkowitz, A. (2009). What should every citizen know about ecology? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(9), 495–500. doi:10.1890/070113.
Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., & Hewer, A. (1983). Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics. New York: Karger.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.
Krathwohl, D. (1993). Methods of educational and social science research. New York: Longman.
Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder (2nd ed.). Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books.
NAAEE. (2004). Excellence in environmental education: Guidelines for learning (pre k-12). Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education. Retrieved from http://www.naaee.org/programs-and-initiatives/guidelines-for-excellence/materials-guidelines/learner-guidelines
Nadler, G. (1981). The planning and design approach. New York: Wiley.
National Research Council. (1995). National science education standards: Observe, interact, change, learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Pergams, O. R. W., & Zaradic, P. A. (2008). Evidence for a fundamental and pervasive shift away from nature-based recreation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(7), 2295–2300. doi:10.1073/pnas.0709893105.
Polk, M., & Knutsson, P. (2008). Participation, value rationality and mutual learning in transdisciplinary knowledge production for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 14(6), 643–653.
Pyle, R. M. (2001). The rise and fall of natural history. Orion: People and Nature, 20(4), 17–23.
Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Rawls, J., & Kelly, E. (2001). Justice as fairness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417–2431. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Englewood Cliffs: Erlbaum.
Second Nature. (n.d). Sustainability curriculum framework. Retrieved from www.secondnature.org
Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classrooms and communities. Great Barrington: The Orion Society.
United Nations. (2006). World urbanization prospects: The 2005 revision (Vol. 210). New York: United Nations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nichols, B.H. (2014). Teaching Earth Smarts: Equipping the Next Generation with the Capacity to Adapt. In: Mueller, M., Tippins, D., Stewart, A. (eds) Assessing Schools for Generation R (Responsibility). Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 41. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2748-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2748-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2747-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2748-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)