Advertisement

Legislative Context and Governance Principles for Dangerous Goods Transportation (DGT) Integrated Risk Management

  • Gianmarco Baldini
  • Carmelo Di Mauro
  • Jean Pierre Nordvik
  • Vincent Mahieu
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Abstract

Transportation of dangerous goods or hazardous material is a sensible security issues in the transportation sector. Dangerous goods can be transported by various means or modes (maritime, air freight, road and railway) but transportation of dangerous goods by road and rail are the most common modes. Road accidents involving dangerous goods can have critical impacts on population and environment present around the incident area. The risk of civilian casualties is increased in urban areas because of the high density of population. The danger of cascading effects in presence of industrial plants deserves also to be considered. It is therefore highly important to identify any action or technology, which can reduce accidents and improve the safety. This chapter is first reviewing the current state of the legislation, its rules and its limitations. It is then considering how ICT/ITS new technologies can improve the DGT monitoring, for a better dangerous goods transportation management. This assessment is based on past experiences of the Joint Research Centre involved in various demonstration and pilot projects. That first part concluding that, even if available and reliable, the advanced technologies for tracking and tracing are still not deployed, the second part will analyze what is missing for large scale deployment, and assess what are the challenges of an harmonized DGT governance at EU level.

Keywords

Global Position System Global Navigation Satellite System Global Navigation Satellite System Intelligent Transportation System Road Accident 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    EUROSTAT Statistics in focus 66/2008 Road freight transport by type of goods – 2006 at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Accessed 13 Aug 2010
  2. 2.
    Giannopoulos GA (2001) An intelligent tracking and tracing solution for intermodal transport. In: Proceedings ITS World conference, Sydney, Sept 2001Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Giannopoulos GA (2004) The application of information and communication technologies in transport. Eur J Oper Res 152:302–320zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Nuclear Association (2010) http://www.world-nuclear.org. Accessed 13 Aug 2010
  5. 5.
    MENTORE Web site (2009) www.gnsstracking.eu. Accessed 10 July 2009
  6. 6.
    Globally Harmonized System of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS) (2010) http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev03/03files_e.html. Accessed 13 Aug 2010
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    UN recommendations on the transport of dangerous goods – model regulations, 14th rev. edn. http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/unrec/rev14/14files_e.html. Accessed 13 Aug 2010
  9. 9.
    MENTORE final event ñMENTORE Manifesto (2010) EGNOS/Galileo services benefiting to regulated applicationsî, Brussels, 10 June 2009. Web site: www.gnsstracking.eu/en/about-mentore/mentore-final-event. Accessed 13 Aug 2010
  10. 10.
    Communication on a Community strategy and framework for the deployment of road transport telematics in Europeî (COM (97) 223 final of 20.05.97)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Minister of the Interior, and Ministry of Equipment, Transportation and Housing (1999) Task Force for Technical Investigation of the 24 March 1999 fire in the Mont Blanc vehicular tunnel – report of 30 June 1999 (English translation)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nordvik JP (2005) ñTraceability and risk assessment for the transport of dangerous substances: results from an Italian case-studyî. 29th ESReDA Seminar, Ispra, Italy, October 25–26th, 2005Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mintsis G, Basbas S, Papaioannou P, Taxiltaris C, Tziavos IN (2004) Applications of GPS technology in the land transportation system. Eur J Oper Res 152:399–409zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    PROMIT Web site (2009) http://www.promit-project.net. Accessed 10 July 2009
  15. 15.
    Planas E, Pastor E, Presutto F, Tixier J (2008) Results of the MITRA project: monitoring and intervention for the transportation of dangerous goods. J Hazard Mater 152:516–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Batarliene N (2008) Mobile decisions of transportation of dangerous goods. In: The 8th international conference ñRELIABILITY and STATISTICS in TRANSPORTATION and COMMUNICATION - 2008î, 15–18 October 2008, Riga, LatviaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Intelligent Access Program Australia-A GPS and map-based project for the monitoring of Authorized Transport. IAP Delivering the benefice. A report prepared by Rapp TRANS AG consultants (Basel) for the Transport Certification Australia, 2008–2009Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Young OR (1992) The effectiveness of international institutions: hard cases and critical variables. In: Rosenau JN, Czempiel E-O (eds) Governance without government: order and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 160–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fischhoff B (1984) ñDefining Riskî. Policy Sci 17:123–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaplan S, Garrick J (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1(1):11–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gunningham N, Grabosky P, Sinclair D (1998) Smart regulation: designing environmental policy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Slovic (2000) The perception of risk, The earthscan risk in society series, ISBN: 9781853835285Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    IRGC (2005) Risk governance – towards an integrative approach, white paper No 1, International Risk Governance Council, Geneva, Sept 2005Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Renn O (2008) Risk governance – coping with uncertainty in a complex world, the earthscan risk in society series, ISBN: 9781844072927Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    United Nations (2009) European agreement concerning the international carriage of dangerous goods by road – ADR, United Nation, Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva, January 2009, ISBN: 13: 978 9211562255Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    United Nations (2009) Recommendations on the transport of dangerous goods. United Nation, Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva. ISBN 13: 978 9211391367Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Saccomanno F, Living, F (2001) GIS-based integrated model for road accident analysis and prediction. Transportation research record 1768, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp 193–202Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    ICF (2000) Risk management framework for hazardous materials transportation. U.S Department of Transport Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, DC, November 1 2000Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fabiano B, Curro F, Reverberi AP, Pastorino R (2005) ñDangerous good transportation by road: from risk analysis to emergency planningî. J Loss Prev Process Ind 18:403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    DCDEP 2000, Risk Assessment in Europe. A summary report from the EU workshop on risk assessment, part 2, Directorate for Civil Defence and Emergency Planning, Oslo 25–26 November 1999, ISBN: 82-993462-8-2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gianmarco Baldini
    • 1
  • Carmelo Di Mauro
    • 2
  • Jean Pierre Nordvik
    • 1
  • Vincent Mahieu
    • 1
  1. 1.TP 361 Institute for the Protection and Security of the CitizenJRC Joint Research CentreIspraItaly
  2. 2.Risk Governance Solutions - RGSBusto ArsizioItaly

Personalised recommendations