Advertisement

Charles Gillispie in the Digital Age

  • Jane Maienschein
  • Manfred D. Laubichler
Chapter
Part of the Archimedes book series (ARIM, volume 30)

Abstract

Denis Diderot was in more than one way a predecessor of Charles Gillispie, and this widely quoted passage does not, of course, apply only to knowledge about nature. It also describes how we acquire our understanding of history. Given the enormity of the world and the almost endless wealth of observations, it is beyond the reach of any single scholar to achieve anything close to a complete overview. Therefore, “profound reflection” and “exact experimentation” are all the more important. And so, we might add, are the organized and guided efforts of large communities of scholars and scientists working towards a common goal. Only then can we even approach collective “creative genius.”

Keywords

Scientific History Marine Biological Laboratory Digital Publication Knowledge Unit Scientific Biography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

Thanks to the National Science Foundation for support through multiple grants.

References

  1. Darnton, Robert. 2008. “The Library in the New Age.” New York Review of Books. June 12, 2008.Google Scholar
  2. Darnton, Robert. 2010. “Can we create a national digital library?” New York Review of Books. October 28, 2010.Google Scholar
  3. Dictionary of Scientific Biography. 1970–1980. Supplement. 1981, edited by Charles Coulston Gillispie; Gillispie and F. L. Holmes et al. New series 2007, edited by Noretta Koertge. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  4. Diderot, Denis. 1753. Quoted from On the Interpretation of Nature, no. 15 in Lester G. Crocker, editor and Derek Coltman translator. 1966. Diderot’s Selected Writings. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Gillispie, Charles Coulston. 1960. The Edge of Objectivity. An Essay in the History of Scientific Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gillispie, Charles Coulston. 1980. Science and Polity in France Science and Polity in France. The End of the Old Regime. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2004. Science and Polity in France: The Revolutionary and Napoleonic Years. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hall, A. Rupert. 1960. Review of Edge. Isis 51: 344–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Laubichler, Manfred, Jane Maienschein, and Grant Yamashita. 2009. “The Embryo Project and the Emergence of a Digital Infrastructure for History and Philosophy of Science.” Annals of the History and Philosophy of Biology 12: 79–96.Google Scholar
  9. Maienschein, Jane and Manfred Laubichler. 2010. “The Embryo Project: An Integrated Approach to History, Practices, and Social Contexts of Embryo Research” Journal of the History of Biology 43: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Biology and Society, Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Marine Biological LaboratoryWoods HoleUSA

Personalised recommendations