Advertisement

Do Children See Robots Differently? A Study Comparing Eye-Movements of Adults vs. Children When Looking at Robotic Faces

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 107)

Abstract

A 2 (face type: robot face vs. human face) × 2 (participants’ age: adults vs. children) between-subjects experiment with four conditions was conducted to explore whether adults and children view robotic faces differently. Participants were presented with a series of pictures including human or robotic faces while their eye movements were being recorded and analyzed by a Tobii x120 Eye Tracker. Results showed that adults had a longer eye fixation time on the eyes than children did for both human and robotic faces. However, children had a longer fixation time on the mouth and nose than adults for both human and robotic faces. Both implications and limitations of the present study as well as guidelines for future research are discussed.

Keywords

Eye-tracking Robot Children Eye-movements 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the World-Class University program (R31-2008-000-10062-0) of the Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology via the National Research Foundation.

References

  1. 1.
    Smalley G, Scott S (1982) For better or for best. Zondervan Publishing House, Grand RapidsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Park E, Kong H, Lim H, Lee J, You S, del Pobil AP (2011) The effect of Robot’s behavior vs. Appearance on communication with humans. In: Sixth ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, ACM, New York, pp 219–220Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot Auton Syst 42(3):143–166MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seiter JS, Gass RH (2003) Perspectives on persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining. Allyn & Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gockley R, Bruce A, Forlizzi J, Michalowski M, Mundell A, Rosenthal S, Sellner B, Simmons R, Snipes K, Schultz AC, Jue W (2005) Designing robots for long-term social interaction. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, IEEE Press, New York, pp 1338–1343Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siegel M, Breazeal C, Norton MI (2009) Persuasive robotics: the influence of robot gender on human behavior. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, IEEE Press, New York, pp 2563–2568Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schermerhorn P, Scheutz M, Crowell CR (2008) Robot social presence and gender: do females view robots differently than males. In: Third ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, ACM, New York, pp 263–270Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gross AL, Ballif B (1991) Children’s understanding of emotion from facial expressions and situations. A review. Develop Rev 11(4):368–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Felleman ES, Carlson CR, Barden RC, Rosenberg L, Marsters JC (1983) Childrens and adults recognition of spontaneous and posed emotional expressions in young children. Dev Psychol 19(3):405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv CL, Walters ML, Robins B, Kose-Bagci H, Mirza NA, Blow M (2009) KASPAR—a minimally expressive humanoid robot for human-robot interaction. Appl Bionics Biomech 6(3):369–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zecca M, Mizoguchi Y, Endo K, Lida F, Kawabata Y, Endo N, Itoh K, Takanishi A (2009) Whole body emotion expressions for KOBIAN humanoid robot—Preliminary experiments with different emotional patters. In: 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication IEEE Press, New York, pp 381–386Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee D, Lee T, So B, Choi M, Shin E, Yang K, Baek M, Kim H, Lee H (2008) Development of an android for emotional expression and human interaction. In: Seventeenth world congress the international federation of automatic control, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Terminator Series, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Terminator

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eunil Park
    • 1
  • Ki Joon Kim
    • 1
  • Angel P. del Pobil
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Interaction ScienceSungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Robotic Intelligence LaboratoryUniversity Jaume-ICastelloSpain

Personalised recommendations