Skip to main content

The Axiom of Choice in an Elementary Theory of Operations and Sets

  • 816 Accesses

Part of the The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science book series (WONS,volume 78)

Abstract

A theory (ETHOS) is developed in which the concepts of operation, function, and single-valued relation are distinguished. In ETHOS operations (and functions) and sets are treated on a par; the former are not ‘reduced’ to sets of ordered pairs, as in set theory, but neither do sets vanish altogether, as in category theory. The theory, which is formulated constructively and based on intuitionistic logic, provides a natural framework for investigating the Axiom of Choice.

Keywords

  • Equivalence Relation
  • Choice Function
  • Function Symbol
  • Category Theory
  • Intuitionistic Logic

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

For Bill Demopoulos, colleague and friend.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2582-9_9
  • Chapter length: 13 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-94-007-2582-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the eleventh edition (1913) of the Encyclopedia Britannica we find the mathematical concept of function defined as a variable number, the value of which depends upon the values of one or more other variable numbers. This is essentially Dirichlet’s definition.

  2. 2.

    Nevertheless, it is of interest to observe that the old term fungible, itself derived from “function”, is defined to mean “capable of mutual substitution” or “interchangeable”; that is, “having the same function”. This would seem to indicate that the idea of function involved is extensional in the sense specified above.

  3. 3.

    For some related approaches, see (Feferman 1975, 1979).

  4. 4.

    More generally, a function can be conceived of as an operation defined on a set respecting a given equivalence relation on that set. Taking the equivalence relation is to represent the idea of “possessing the same value”, an operation respecting such is then extensional in the sense that its outputs depend only on the “values” of its inputs.

  5. 5.

    Here the term “function symbol” (which, strictly speaking, should be “operation symbol”) is being used with its usual syntactic sense in formal systems.

  6. 6.

    These axioms are related to those of the system RST—rudimentary set theory – introduced in Bell (2009). See also Bell (2008).

  7. 7.

    Here and in the sequel we employ standard set-theoretical terms such as “equivalence relation” and symbols and terms such as ⊆ for inclusion.

  8. 8.

    Here a set X is said to be nonempty if \(\exists x.\;x \in X\).

  9. 9.

    This is the principle of detachability introduced in (Bell, 2009).

References

  • Beeson, M. 1985. Foundations of constructive mathematics. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J.L. 2008. The axiom of choice and the law of excluded middle in weak set theories. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 54(2): 194–201.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J.L. 2009. The axiom of choice. London: College Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feferman, S. 1975. A language and axioms for explicit mathematics. In Algebra and logic, Springer lecture notes in mathematics 450, ed. John Crossley, 87–139. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feferman, S. 1979. Constructive theories of functions and classes. In Logic colloquium ’78, eds. M. Boffa, D. van Dalen, and K. McAloon, 159–224. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf, P. 2006. 100 years of Zermelo’s axiom of choice: what was the problem with it? The Computer Journal 49(3): 345–350.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John L. Bell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bell, J.L. (2012). The Axiom of Choice in an Elementary Theory of Operations and Sets. In: Frappier, M., Brown, D., DiSalle, R. (eds) Analysis and Interpretation in the Exact Sciences. The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 78. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2582-9_9

Download citation