Queer Masculinities pp 47-67 | Cite as
Phallic Girls?: Girls’ Negotiation of Phallogocentric Power
Abstract
This chapter critically responds to Judith Halberstam’s concern that studies of masculinities are confined to boys and boyhood and Angela McRobbie’s despair that the “phallic girl” with her licensed mimicry of masculinism disavows any resistance to regulatory gender/sexual regimes. Inspired by Judith Butler’s notion of performativity and her desire to trouble and undo gender/sex/sexuality binarisms, this chapter queers the field of masculinity/boyhood studies and addresses postfeminist concerns about the lack of a politics of resistance by foregrounding the seduction of contemporary tomboyism for young tweenage girls in their negotiation of an increasingly (hetero)sexualized girlhood (Mitchell & Reid-Walsh, Seven going on seventeen: Tween studies in the culture of girlhood. New York: Peter Lang, 2005). A central aim of the chapter is to problematize the binary logic of sexual difference that has informed past and current, even queer theorizations of tomboyism by queer(y)ing the ways in which girls’ ditching of or deviation from normative femininity is often theorized as performing masculinity. We argue, following Butler, that interpreting tomboyism as mimesis in this way misses how girls can manipulate norms, exceed them, and rework them and thus “expose the realities to which we thought we were confined as open to transformation” (Butler, Undoing gender. London: Routledge, 2004, p. 217). The chapter concludes by asking what would it mean (theoretically, methodologically, and empirically) to create gender taxonomies that are flexible enough to recognize a more capacious femininity that can embrace subversion and resistance without ejecting such queer performances into the realm of masculinity and thus reproducing dominant discourses of masculinity as “power” and femininity as “lack.”
Keywords
Sexual Harassment Sexual Identity Subject Position Hegemonic Masculinity Compulsory SexualizationReferences
- Aaopola, S., Gonick, M., & Harris, A. (2004). Young femininity. Buckingham, England: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- Albury, K., & Lumby, C. (2010). ‘Too Much? Too Young?: The sexualisation of children debate in Australia’. Media International Australia, 135, 141–152.Google Scholar
- Ali, S. (2003). To be a ‘girl’: Culture and class in schools. Gender and Education , 15(30), 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Allan, A. (2009). The importance of being a ‘lady’: Hyper-femininity and heterosexuality in the private, single-sex primary school. Gender and Education , 21(2), 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Allen-Mills, T. (2006, October 15). Free at last: Alpha teenage girls on top. Retrieved July 15, 2008, from http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article600902.ece
- Archer, L., Halsall, A., & Hollingworth, S. (2007). Inner-city femininities and education: “Race,” class, gender and schooling in young women’s lives. Gender and Education , 19(5), 549–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Baker, J. (2009). Great expectations and post-feminist accountability: Young women living up to the ‘successful girls’ discourse. Gender and Education, 21(3), 1–17.Google Scholar
- BBC News Online. (2003, September 16). Girls top of the class worldwide. Retrieved July 20, 2008, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/3110594.stm
- Blaise, M. (2005). Playing it straight. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Braidotti, R. (2003). Becoming woman: Or sexual difference revisited. Theory, Culture and Society , 20(3), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cixous, H. (2000). The laugh of the Medusa. In B. Brummet (Ed.), Reading rhetorical theory (pp. 879–893). New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
- Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (forthcoming 2012). Deleuze and research methodologies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- Conlin, M. (2003, May 26). The new gender gap: From kindergarten to grad school, boys are becoming the second sex. Business Week. Retrieved August 26, 2011, from http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/03_21/b3834001_mz001.htm
- Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF). (2007a). Confident, capable and creative: Supporting boys’ achievements. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF). (2007b). Gender and achievement: The evidence from pupils in England. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Driscoll, C. (2002). Girls: Feminine adolescence in popular culture and cultural theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Duncan, N. (2004). It’s important to be nice, but it’s nicer to be important: Girls, popularity and sexual competition. Sex Education, 4(2), 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Egan, D., & Hawkes, G. (2008). Endangered girls and incendiary objects: Unpacking the discourse on sexualization. Sexuality and Culture, 12, 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Epstein, D., Elwood, J., Hey, V., & Maw, J. (Eds.). (1998). Failing boys?: Issues in gender and achievement. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Epstein, D., Kehily, M., Mac an Ghaill, M., & Redman, P. (2001). Boys and girls come out to play: Making masculinities and femininities in school playgrounds. Men and Masculinities , 4(2), 158–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Foster, V. (2000). Is female educational ‘success’ destabilizing the male learner-citizen? In M. Arnot & J. A. Dillabough (Eds.), Challenging democracy: International perspectives on gender, education and citizenship (pp. 203–215). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
- Freud, S. (1924/1991). The dissolution of the Oedipus complex. In A. Richards & A. Dickson (Eds.), On sexuality, the Penguin Freud library (Vol. VII, pp. 313–322). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies , 10(2), 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gonick, M. (2003). Between femininities: Ambivalence, identity and the education of girls. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Gonick, M. (2004). Old plots and new identities: Ambivalent femininities in late modernity. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education , 25(2), 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Griffin, C. (2004). Good girls, bad girls: Anglocentricism and diversity in the constitution of contemporary girlhood. In A. Harris (Ed.), All about the girl: Culture, power and identity (pp. (29–45). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
- Griffin, C. (2005). Impossible spaces?: Femininity as an empty category. Paper presented at the ESRC Research Seminar Series: New Femininities, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
- Halberstam, J. (1998). Female masculinity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Hall, J. (2000). It hurts to be a girl. Gender & Society, 14, 630–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harris, A. (Ed.). (2004a). All about the girl: Culture, power and identity. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
- Harris, A. (2004b). Future girl. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hey, V. (1997). The company she keeps. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Hickey-Moody, A., & Malins, P. (2006). Deleuzian encounters: Studies in contemporary social issues. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- Hickey-Moody, A. C., & Rasmussen, M. L. (2009). The sexed subject in-between Deleuze and Butler. In C. Nigianni & M. Storr (Eds.), Deleuze and queer theory (pp. 37–53). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- Irigaray, L. (1997). The sex which is not one. In R. R. Warhol & D. P. Herndl (Eds.), Feminisms (pp. 363–369). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Jackson, C., Paechter, C., & Renold, E. (Eds.). (2010). Girls in education 3–16: Continuing concerns, New Agendas. Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Jiwani, Y., Steenbergen, C., & Mitchell, C. (2006). Girlhood: Redefining the limits. New York: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, C. (1987). Deterritorializations: The rewriting of home and exile in Western feminist discourse. Cultural Critique , 6(Spring Issue), 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kehily, M. J. (2002). Sexuality and schooling: Shifting agendas in social learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kehily, M. J., Epstein, D., Mac an Ghaill, M., & Redman, P. (2002). Private girls, public worlds: Producing femininities in the primary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education , 23(3), 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kindlon, D. (2006). Alpha girls: Understanding the new American girl and how she is changing the world. New York: Rodale Books.Google Scholar
- Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection (L. S. Roudiez, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Lacan, J. (1977/2002). Écrits: A selection. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- McLeod, J. (2002). Working out intimacy: Young people and friendship in an age of reflexivity. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education , 23(2), 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McRobbie, A. (2004). Notes on postfeminism and popular culture: Bridget Jones and the new gender regime. In A. Harris (Ed.), All about the girl: Culture, power and identity (pp. 3–14). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
- McRobbie, A. (2007). Top girls? Cultural Studies , 21(4–5), 718–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McRobbie, A. (2008). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- McRobbie, A., & Garber, J. (1976). Girls and subcultures. In S. Hall & T. Jefferson (Eds.), Resistance through rituals. Youth subcultures in postwar Britain. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
- Mellor, D. (2007). Playground romance: An ethnography of children’s investments in romantic love. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cardiff University.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, C., & Reid-Walsh, J. (Eds.). (2005). Seven going on seventeen: Tween studies in the culture of girlhood. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Paechter, C., & Clark, S. (2007). Who are tomboys and how do we recognize them? Women’s Studies International Forum , 30(4), 342–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reay, D. (2001). ‘Spice girls,’ ‘nice girls,’ ‘girlies,’ and ‘tomboys’: Gender discourses, girls’ cultures and femininities in the primary classroom. Gender and Education , 13(2), 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Renold, E. (2002). Presumed innocence: (Hetero)sexual, homophobic and heterosexist harassment amongst primary school girls and boys. Childhood , 9(4), 415–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Renold, E. (2005). Girls, boys and junior sexualities. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
- Renold, E. (2006). ‘They won’t let us play…unless you’re going out with one of them’: Girls, boys and Butler’s ‘heterosexual matrix’ in the primary years. British Journal of the Sociology of Education , 27(4), 489–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Renold, E. (2008). Queering masculinity: Re-theorising contemporary tomboyism in the schizoid space of innocent/heterosexualized young femininities. Girlhood Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal , 1(2), 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Renold, E., & Allan, A. (2006). Bright and beautiful: High-achieving girls, ambivalent femininities and the feminisation of success. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education , 27(4), 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2008). Regulation and rupture: Mapping tween and teenage girls’ resistance to the heterosexual matrix. Feminist Theory , 9(3), 313–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (in press, 2011). Schizoid subjectivities: Re-theorising teen-girls’ sexual cultures in an era of sexualisation. Journal of Sociology, 47(4).Google Scholar
- Ringrose, J. (2006). A new universal mean girl: Examining the discursive construction and social regulation of a new feminine pathology. Feminism and Psychology , 16(4), 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ringrose, J. (2007). Successful girls?: Complicating post-feminist, neoliberal discourses of educational achievement and gender equality. Gender and Education , 19(4), 471–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ringrose, J. (2008a). ‘Every time she bends over she pulls up her thong’: Teen girls negotiating discourses of competitive, heterosexualized aggression. Girlhood Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal , 1(1), 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ringrose, J. (2008b). ‘Just be friends’: Exploring the limitations of educational bully discourses and practices for understanding teen girls’ heterosexualized friendships and conflicts. British Journal of Sociology of Education , 29(5), 509–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ringrose, J. (in press). Post-Feminist Education? Girls and the sexual politics of schooling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ringrose, J., & Walkerdine, V. (2007). Exploring some contemporary dilemmas of femininity and girlhood in the West. In C. A. Mitchell & J. Reid-Walsh (Eds.), Girl culture: An encylopedia. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
- Riviere, J. (1929/1986). Womanliness as masquerade. In V. Burgin & J. Donald (Eds.), Formations of fantasy (pp. 35–44). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
- Rozenberg, G., & Bennett, R. (2006, October 27). Girls beat boys at school, now they get higher pay. Retrieved July 20, 2008, from http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article615102.ece
- Russell, R., & Tyler, M. (2002). Thank heaven for little girls: ‘Girl heaven’ and the commercial context of feminine childhood. Sociology , 36(3), 619–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, self, culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- St. Pierre, E. (2000). Nomadic inquiry in the smooth spaces of the field: A preface. In E. St. Pierre & W. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 258–284). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Taft, J. K. (2004). Girl power politics: Pop-culture barriers and organizational resistance. In A. Harris (Ed.), All about the girl: Culture, power and identity (pp. 69–79). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
- Tamboukou, M. (2004). Nomadic trails in the unfolding of the self. Spaces of Identity, 4(2). Retrieved July 10, 2008, from http://https://pi.library.yorku.ca/ojs/index.php/soi/article/view/8009/7165
- Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Walkerdine, V. (1998). Counting girls out (2nd ed.). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Walkerdine, V. (2007). Children, gender, video games: Towards a relational approach to multimedia. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walkerdine, V., Lucey, H., & Melody, J. (2001). Growing up girl: Psycho-social explorations of gender and class. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- Youdell, D. (2006). Impossible bodies, impossible selves. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar