Emission control strategies for short-chain chloroparaffins in two semi-hypothetical case cities
The short-chain chloroparaffins (SCCP), (C10-13 chloroalkanes) are identified in the European Water Framework Directive, as priority hazardous substances. Within the ScorePP project, the aim is to develop emission control strategies that can be employed to reduce emissions from urban areas into receiving waters. Six different scenarios for mitigating SCCP emissions in two different semi-hypothetical case cities representing eastern inland and northern coastal conditions have been evaluated. The analysis, associated with scenario uncertainty, indicates that the EU legislation, Best Available Technologies (BAT) and stormwater/CSO management were the most favorable in reducing emissions into the environment.
KeywordsEuropean Water Framework Directive Combine Sewer Overflow Substance Flow Analysis Urban Source Voluntary Initiative
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.European Commission (2008) Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy, amending and subsequently repealing Council Directives 82/176/EEC, 83/513/EEC, 84/156/EEC, 84/491/EEC, 86/280/EEC and amending Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.Google Scholar
- 2.European Commission (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.Google Scholar
- 3.European Chemicals Bureau (2000) European Union Risk Assessment Report alkanes, C10-13, chloro CAS No.: 85535-84-8 EINECS No.: 287–476. 1st Priority List, Volume 4. European Commission, EUR 19010 EN.Google Scholar
- 4.Wickman T, Lecloux A, Scholes L (2009) Voluntary Initiatives for Reducing the Use of Priority Pollutant Containing Products. Deliverable No. D4.4, ScorePP.Google Scholar
- 5.Seriki K., Gasperi J., Castillo L., Scholes L., Eriksson L., Revitt M., Meinhold J., Atanasova N. (2008) Priority pollutants behaviour in end of pipe wastewater treatment plants. Deliverable No. D5.4, ScorePP.Google Scholar
- 6.Eriksson E., Donner E., Raggatt L., Pettersson M., Wickman T., Mikkelsen P.S. (2009) Strategies for Controlling Emissions of Priority Pollutants from Case City Archetypes. WEFTEC Conference, Orlando, USA, 2009-10-14.Google Scholar
- 7.Revitt M., Scholes L.. Donner E. (2009) Priority pollutant behaviour in onsite treatment systems for industrial wastewater. Deliverable No. D5.3 ScorePP.Google Scholar
- 9.Scholes L., Revitt M., Gasperi J., Donner E. (2007) Priority pollutant behaviour in stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs). Deliverable No. D5.1, ScorePP.Google Scholar
- 10.ECHA (2008) Alkanes, C10–13, chloro. SVHC SUPPORT DOCUMENT.Google Scholar
- 13.Holten Lützhøft H.C., Eriksson E., Donner E., Wickman T., Banovec P., Mikkelsen P.S., Ledin A. (2009) Quantifying releases of priority pollutants from urban sources. WEFTEC Conference, Orlando, USA, 2009-10-14.Google Scholar
- 14.Fridén U., McLachlan M. (2007) Substansflödesanalys av klorparaffiner i Stockholms stad 2004. Nya gifter – nya verktyg, ISSN: 1653–9168.Google Scholar
- 15.Sternbeck J., Brorström-Lundén E., Remberger M., Kaj L., Palm A., Junedahl E., Cato I. (2003) WFD Priority substances in sediments from Stockholm and the Svealand coastal region. IWL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, No. B1538.Google Scholar