Skip to main content

Chicago Metropolis Plans 2020

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of Cities and Regions

Part of the book series: Springer Geography ((SPRINGERGEOGR))

Abstract

Chicago Metropolis 2020 (renamed Metropolis Strategies in 2011) is a nonprofit organization created by the Commercial Club of Chicago in 1999 to advocate for better regional planning and smart investments to promote the region’s long-term economic health and enable all residents of the six-county region to reach their full potential. Some of these investments are in physical infrastructure.

The Metropolis Plan was developed using the same kind of computer modeling technology that engineers use to design virtual planes and that military planners use to fight hypothetical wars over and over again. These tools allow us to project how and where growth will occur under different scenarios, such as different choices for housing density or transportation infrastructure, and then how those development patterns will affect our quality of life.

The premise of the Metropolis Plan is simple. We can build a better region. We can spend less time in traffic. We can live nearer to our jobs. We can protect more open space and environmentally sensitive areas. We can build communities that are friendlier to walking and biking—and therefore healthier for the people who live in them. We can make economic opportunity available to more of our region’s residents.

Chicago Metropolis 2020 recognizes that public policy influences private decisions. We do not believe in coercing people to behave differently. We do believe that people will behave differently if offered a better range of choices. If we design our communities to be more friendly to pedestrians, some people will choose to walk rather than drive. If we offer a broader array of housing options throughout the region, some people will choose to live nearer to where they work. If we invest in a more comfortable and convenient transit system, some people will gladly sell their second car and ride the train to work.

The goal of the Metropolis Plan is to broaden the range of private choices in a way that leads to a better collective outcome. The purpose is not to tell people how they should live; it is to listen to how people would like to live and then help them get there.

Chicago Metropolis 2020 asked a broad swath of residents of the Chicago region about their views on growth and development. We met with groups ranging from business leaders to organized labor. We held town meetings around the region and conducted a public opinion survey of 1450 Chicago area residents. We recorded what people told us about how they would like our region to grow. As a result of these conversations, Chicago Metropolis 2020 formulated a set of shared regional goals. They include the following:

• New development will make efficient use of existing infrastructure, land, buildings, and capital.

• Housing, jobs, and commercial services will be within walking distance of one another.

• The region will improve its efficiency in moving people and goods.

• People throughout the region will have access to quality affordable housing, good jobs, and good schools.

• Families will be able to choose to live near where they work, shop, and go to school.

• All people and places will benefit from the region’s prosperity.

• The region will practice good stewardship of the environment, including air, water, natural habitats, and open space.

• A robust economy will make the region more prosperous and attractive.

• Residents of all income levels will have access to clean air and water and meaningful opportunities to enjoy the outdoors.

The Metropolis Plan was created using sophisticated modeling techniques, the advice from residents of the region, and input from land use and transportation experts. These resources were used to create several different scenarios, each of which allowed us to take a virtual look at what life would be like in 2020.

The economic, land use, and transportation models were used to forecast trends, to organize an extraordinary amount of data about our region, and to test what might happen if we added a new expressway, doubled the budget for transit, moved jobs and housing closer together, or made other policy changes that might affect the outcomes we care about.

Of the various scenarios created, two were selected to illustrate what the future might hold for us. The first is “Business as Usual,” a look at what might happen if our land use and transportation policies over the next 30 years mirror the policies of the previous decade. The second scenario is “The Metropolis Plan”—an alternative path that reflects the principles and preferences that residents of the region shared with us.

The result—The Metropolis Plan: Choices for the Chicago Region, published in 2001—is a blueprint for creating a better region.

Jim La Belle (liberally excerpted by Arch. Giuseppe Roccasalva) with additions and edits of Paul O’Connor

The Metropolis Plan was the original work of Chicago Metropolis 2020 (now Metropolis Strategies)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Changing Direction: Transportation Choices for 2030, published by the Center for Neighborhood Technology, released September 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Metropolis 2020: Preparing Metropolitan Chicago for the 21st Century, a project of the Commercial Club of Chicago in association with the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, January 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Critical Cargo: A Regional Freight Action Agenda, prepared by Business Leaders for Transportation, April 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Delay-Volume Relations for Travel Forecasting: Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Alan Horowitz, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Lake County Transportation Improvement Project; Lake County, IL, September 2001. FHWA-IL-EIS-00-01-D

    Google Scholar 

  • Executive Summary of the Tax Policy Forum Working Group Reports, a submission to Cook County Assessor James M. Houlihan, December 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Final Report of the Illinois Growth Task Force, issued February 4, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Getting the Chicago Region Moving: A Coordinated Agenda for the 2003 Federal Transportation Debate, by Business Leaders for Transportation, January 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Getting to Smart Growth: 100 Policies for Implementation, published by the International City and County Management Association and The Smart Growth Network, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Incorporating Feedback in Travel Forecasting: Methods, Pitfalls, and Common Concerns, Travel Model Improvement Program (TMIP), March 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • New Distribution and Mode Choice Models for Chicago, Washington DC, January 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Plan Preparation: Destination 2020 Planning Process, Chicago Area Transportation Study, p. 8–16, August 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Recommendations for Developing Attainable Workforce Housing in the Chicago Region: A Workforce Housing Policy Agenda and Guide from Chicago Metropolis 2020, released Summer 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Regional Realities: Measuring Progress Toward Shared Regional Goals, Chicago Metropolis 2020, February 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • The Chicago Central Area Plan: Preparing the Central City for the 21st Century, recommendations to the Central Area Plan Steering Committee, July 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • The Location Efficient Mortgage Project: Summary of Results of Location and Auto Cost Correlation Study, Center for Neighborhood Technology

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors James La Belle, Paul O’Connor, and Giuseppe Roccasalva would like to acknowledge the following for their work experience: The Executive Council of Chicago, the Technical Advisory Committee (Chair Frank So), and the contributions of the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission (NIPC) and the Chicago Area Transportation Study (CATS). Both NIPC and CATS staff served the Metropolis Plan in a variety of capacities contributing their time, resources, and data. The long list of advisors such as Fregonese Calthorpe Associates, Smart Mobility, Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, University of Illinois, Openlands Project, Metropolitan Planning Council, Center for Neighborhood Technology, American Planning Association, RW Ventures, and Ben Starrett, director of the Funders’ Network for Smart Growth and Livable Communities is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jim La Belle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

La Belle, J., O’Connor, P., Roccasalva, G. (2012). Chicago Metropolis Plans 2020. In: Bazzanella, L., Caneparo, L., Corsico, F., Roccasalva, G. (eds) The Future of Cities and Regions. Springer Geography. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2518-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics