Advertisement

Recent Advances in Point-of-Access Water Quality Monitoring

Water Quality
  • O. Korostynska
  • K. Arshak
  • V. Velusamy
  • A. Arshak
  • Ashok Vaseashta
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology book series (NAPSA)

Abstract

Clean water is one of our most valuable natural resources. In addition to providing safe drinking water it assures functional ecosystems that support fisheries and recreation. Human population growth and its associated increased demands on water pose risks to maintaining acceptable water quality. It is vital to assess source waters and the aquatic systems that receive inputs from industrial waste and sewage treatment plants, storm water systems, and runoff from urban and agricultural lands. Rapid and confident assessments of aquatic resources form the basis for sound environmental management. Current methods engaged in tracing the presence of various bacteria in water employ bulky laboratory equipment and are time consuming. Thus, real-time water quality monitoring is essential for National and International Health and Safety. Environmental water monitoring includes measurements of physical characteristics (e.g. pH, temperature, conductivity), chemical parameters (e.g. oxygen, alkalinity, nitrogen and phosphorus compounds), and abundance of certain biological taxa. Monitoring could also include assays of biological activity such as alkaline phosphatase, tests for toxins such as microcystins and direct measurements of pollutants such as heavy metals or hydrocarbons. Real time detection can significantly reduce the level of damage and also the cost to remedy the problem. This paper presents overview of state-of-the-art methods and devices used for point-of-access water quality monitoring and suggest further developments in this area.

Keywords

Water quality monitoring Sensor arrays Real-time detection 

References

  1. 1.
    WHO (2005) Burden of disease and cost-effectiveness estimates http://www.who.int
  2. 2.
    Bourgeois W, Burgess J, Stuetz R (2001) On-line monitoring of wastewater quality: a review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 76(4):337–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thomas O (1997) Wastewater quality monitoring. Trends Anal Chem 16(7):419–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Devereux R (2006) Development and applications of microbial ecogenomic indicators for monitoring water quality: report of a workshop assessing the state of the science, research needs, and future directions. Environ Monit Assess 116:459–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Campbell GA, Mutharasan R (2006) Detection of Bacillus anthracis spores and a model protein using PEMC sensors in a flow cell at 1 mL/min. Biosensors Bioelectron 22(1):78–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arora K, Chand S, Malhotra BD (2006) Recent developments in bio-molecular electronics techniques for food pathogens. Anal Chim Acta 568 (1–2):259–274Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Felfoldi T, Tarnoczai T, Homonnay ZG (2010) Presence of potential bacterial pathogens in a municipal drinking water supply system. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 57(3):165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee DY, Seto P, Korczak R (2010) DNA microarray-based detection and identification of waterborne protozoan pathogens. J Microbiol Methods 80(2):129–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim H, Kane MD, Kim S, Dominguez W, Applegate BM, Savikhin S (2007) A molecular beacon DNA microarray system for rapid detection of E. coli O157: H7 that eliminates the risk of a false negative signal. Biosensors Bioelectron 22(6):1041–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sungkanak U, Sappat A, Wisitsoraat A, Promptmas C, Tuantranont A (2010) Ultrasensitive detection of Vibrio cholerae O1 using microcantilever-based biosensor with dynamic force microscopy. Biosensors Bioelectron 26(2):784–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fay C, Lau KT, Beirne S, Conaire CO, McGuinness K, Corcoran B, O’Connor NE, Diamond D, McGovern S, Coleman G, Shepherd R, Alici G, Spinks G, Wallace G (2010) Wireless aquatic navigator for detection and analysis (WANDA). Sens Actuat B Chem 150(1):425–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    VanderNoot VA, Renzi RF, Mosier BP, de Vreugde JLV, Shokair I, Haroldsen BL (2010) Development of an integrated microfluidic instrument for unattended water-monitoring applications. Electrophoresis 31(15):2632–2640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arshak K, Adley CC, Moore E, Cunniffe C, Campion M, Harris J (2007) Characterisation of polymer nanocomposite sensors for quantification of bacterial cultures. Sens Actuat B 126:226–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arshak K, Adley CC, Moore EG, Cunniffe C, Campion M, Menvielle I (2007) Detection of Raistonia Pickettii bacteria in M9 medium using polymer nanocomposite sensors in IEEE sensors applications symposium. IEEE Computer Society, San DiegoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Korostynska
    • 1
  • K. Arshak
    • 2
  • V. Velusamy
    • 2
  • A. Arshak
    • 2
  • Ashok Vaseashta
    • 3
  1. 1.Dublin Institute of TechnologyDublinIreland
  2. 2.University of LimerickLimerickIreland
  3. 3.Institute for Advanced Sciences ConvergenceNUARIHerndonUSA

Personalised recommendations