Advertisement

Vitalism Versus Emergent Materialism

  • Brian Garrett
Chapter
Part of the History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences book series (HPTL, volume 2)

Abstract

During the nineteenth century vitalist theories of life were contrasted with mechanistic and materialist hypotheses regarding the nature of life. Religious, philosophical and empirical reasons were offered for vitalism by numerous thinkers. Mechanistic theories of life appeared problematic, despite their steady empirical success. Emergent evolutionism was thought by some (mostly English-speaking thinkers) to be a compromise position between vitalism and materialism, taking mechanism from the materialists and nonreductionism from the vitalists. The debate was interrupted by World War II and largely forgotten after the discovery of the double helix. In this chapter I introduce some of the thinkers involved and articulate the fundamental tenets and aspirations of vitalists and emergent evolutionists, explaining the philosophical debate (and confusion) over the concepts invoked by each side. I draw on philosophers and biologists from 1900 to 1930 in this study.

Keywords

Emergence Emergent materialism Reductionism Vitalism 

References

  1. Alexander, Samuel. 1920. Space, time, and deity, vol. 2. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, Garland E. 2005. Mechanism, vitalism and organicism in late nineteenth- and twentieth-century biology: The importance of historical context. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, Lynne. 2007. The metaphysics of everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beckermann, Ansgar, Hans Flohr, and Jaegwon Kim (eds.). 1992. Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  5. Bedau, Mark. 1991. Can biological teleology be naturalized? Journal of Philosophy 88: 647–657.Google Scholar
  6. Bedau, Mark. 1992. Weak emergence. Philosophical Perspectives 11: 375–399.Google Scholar
  7. Blitz, David. 1992. Qualitative novelty and the levels of reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  8. Block, Ned, and Robert Stalnaker. 1999. Conceptual analysis, dualism and the explanatory gap. Philosophical Review 108: 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boodin, John. 1925. Cosmic evolution. London: MacMillan and Co.Google Scholar
  10. Burge, Tyler. 1979. Individualism and the mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4: 73–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burroughs, John. 1912. The new vitalism. The North American Review 196(685): 759–771.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, Richard J., and Mark A. Bickhard. 2011. Physicalism, emergence and downward causation. Axiomathes 21(1): 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Canguilhem, Georges. 2008. Knowledge of life, eds. Paola Marrati and Todd Meyers. Trans. Stefanos Geroulanos and Daniela Ginsburg. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, W. (ed.). 1918. Life and finite individuality: Two symposia. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
  15. Conger, George P. 1929. New views of evolution. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Davidson, Donald. 1993. Thinking causes. In Mental causation, ed. John Heil, 3–17. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  17. Drake, Durant. 1925. Mind and its place in nature. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Driesch, Hans A. 1894. Analytische Theorie der organischen Entwicklung. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Driesch, Hans A. 1907 [1908]. The science and philosophy of the organism: The Gifford lectures delivered before the University of Aberdeen in the year 1907 [and 1908]. London: Adams and Charles Black.Google Scholar
  20. Driesch, Hans A. 1914. The history and theory of vitalism. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Dupré, John. 1993. The disorder of things. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Elkus, Savilla Alice. 1911. Mechanism and vitalism. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 8(13): 355–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Emmeche, Claus, S. Køppe, and F. Stjernfelt. 1997. Explaining emergence: Towards an ontology of levels. Journal for General Philosophy of Science/Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28(1): 83–119.Google Scholar
  24. Freyhofer, Horst H. 1982. The vitalism of Hans Driesch. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  25. Garrett, Brian. 1999. Pluralism, causation and overdetermination. Synthese 116(3): 355–378.Google Scholar
  26. Garrett, Brian. 2000. Defending non-epiphenomenal event dualism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 38(3): 393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Garrett, Brian. 2003. Teleology and vitalism in the natural philosophy of Nehemiah Grew (1641–1712). British Journal for the History of Science 36(1): 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Garrett, Brian. 2006. What the history of vitalism teaches us about consciousness and the hard problem. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72(3): 616–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grossman, Edgar F. 1930. Something about vitalism and mechanism. The Scientific Monthly 30(6): 541–546.Google Scholar
  30. Gurwitsch, Aron. 1915. On practical vitalism. The American Naturalist 49(588): 763–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haldane, John Scott. 1931. The philosophical basis of biology. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  32. Haldane, John Scott. 1932. Materialism. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  33. Hein, Hilde. 1969. Molecular Biology vs. Organicism: The enduring dispute between mechanism and vitalism. Synthese 20(2): 238–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoernlé, R.F.Alfred. 1918. Mechanism and vitalism. Philosophical Review 27(6): 628–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. James, William. 1890. The principles of psychology. Reprint, 1950. New York: Dover Reprints.Google Scholar
  36. Jennings, H.S. 1911. Vitalism and experimental investigation. Science, New Series 33(859): 927–932.Google Scholar
  37. Jennings, H.S. 1912. Driesch’s vitalism and experimental indeterminism. Science, New Series 36 (927): 434–435.Google Scholar
  38. Jennings, H.S. 1913. Doctrines held as vitalism. The American Naturalist 47(559): 385–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jennings, H.S. 1918. Mechanism and vitalism. Philosophical Review 27(6): 577–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jennings, H.S. 1927. Diverse doctrines of evolution, their relation to the practice of science and of life. Science, New Series 65(1672): 19–25.Google Scholar
  41. Jennings, H.S. 1930. The biological basis of human nature. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  42. Lovejoy, Arthur O. 1911. The meaning of vitalism. Science, New Series 33(851): 610–614.Google Scholar
  43. Lovejoy, Arthur O. 1912. The unity of science. University of Missouri Bulletin i(1): 1–35.Google Scholar
  44. Lovejoy, Arthur O. 1927. The meanings of ‘emergence’ and its modes. Journal of Philosophical Studies 2(6): 167–181.Google Scholar
  45. Mackenzie, W. Leslie. 1926. Methods of analysis. Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 6: 56–62.Google Scholar
  46. Malaterre, Christophe. 2013. Life as an emergent phenomenon: From an alternative to vitalism to an alternative to reductionism. In Vitalism and the scientific image in post-Enlightenment life science, 1800–2010, ed. Sebastian Normandin and Charles T. Wolfe, 155–178. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. McDougall, William. 1929. Modern materialism and emergent evolution. New York: D. Van Nostrand.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McLaughlin, Brian. 2003. Vitalism and emergence. In The Cambridge history of philosophy: 1870–1945, ed. Thomas Baldwin, 631–639. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Morgan, C.Lloyd. 1923. Emergent evolution. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
  50. Nagel, Ernest. 1961. The structure of science. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  51. Neal, H. V. 1916. The basis of individuality in organisms. A defense of vitalism. Science, New Series 44(1125): 82–97.Google Scholar
  52. Needham, Joseph. 1930. Order and life. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  53. Nouvel, Pascal (ed.). 2011. Repenser le vitalisme. Histoire et philosophie du vitalisme. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  54. O’Connor, Timothy. 2000. Persons and causes: The metaphysics of free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Santayana, George. 1905. The life of reason, vol. 1. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  56. Silberstein, Michael, and John McGeever. 1999. The search for ontological emergence. The Philosophical Quarterly 49: 182–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smuts, Jan Christian. 1926. Holism and evolution. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  58. Spaulding, Edward G. 1906. Driesch’s theory of vitalism. Philosophical Review 15(5): 518–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Strawson, Peter Frederick. 1961. Individuals: An essay in descriptive metaphysics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  60. Strawson, Galen. 2006. Consciousness and its place in nature. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  61. Strong, Charles A. 1918. The origin of consciousness: An attempt to conceive of the mind as a product of evolution. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  62. Thompson, D'Arcy Wentworth. 1917. On growth and form. Cambridge: The University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Thomson, J.Arthur. 1920. The system of animate nature. New York: Henry Holt and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Warren, Howard C. 1916a. A study of purpose. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 13(1): 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Warren, Howard C. 1916b. A study of purpose II: Purposive activity in organisms. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 13(2): 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Warren, Howard C. 1916c. A study of purpose III: The role of purpose in nature. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 13(3): 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Warren, Howard C. 1918. Mechanism versus vitalism in the domain of psychology. Philosophical Review 27(6): 597–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Whitehead, Alfred. 1929. Process and reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Wolfe, Charles T. 2009. A happiness fit for organic bodies: La Mettrie’s medical Epicureanism. In Epicurus in the enlightenment, ed. Neven Leddy and Avi Lifschitz, 69–83. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations