Abstract
This chapter contributes to the explanation of human cooperative behaviour, examining the implications of Brian Skyrms’ modelling of the prisoner’s dilemma (PD). Augmenting a PD with signalling strategies promotes cooperation, but a challenge that must be addressed is what prevents signals being subverted by deceptive behaviour. Empirical results suggest that emotional displays can play a signalling role and, to some extent, are secure from subversion. I examine proximate explanations and then offer an evolutionary explanation for the translucency of emotional displays, by which I mean that visible displays are well, but imperfectly, correlated with genuine emotional episodes. Natural selection acts on the basis of lifetime fitness consequences and, crucially for my argument, the intensity of selection decreases over the course of a lifetime. Hence we tend to possess traits that promote survival when young and, with regard to emotional displays, translucency allows successful maturation over our protracted period of nurturing by close kin. This is due to the vital role played by emotional interactions in the normal cognitive and social development of Homo sapiens.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
An interaction in which mutual cooperation is the best collective outcome but where non-cooperation (defection) is each player’s individually preferred action irrespective of the other’s action.
- 2.
An Evolutionarily Stable Strategy is one that, when played by the whole population, cannot be invaded by a novel “mutant” strategy.
- 3.
I think that this second role is much less problematic than Frank’s “commitment model” of emotions.
- 4.
The 206 studies in the meta-analysis do not focus explicitly on the PD and they do not share in common one definition of deception. In the case of Ekman’s studies in the following section, deception consists of attempts to withhold negative emotions.
- 5.
These studies don’t investigate the cues on which judgements are based.
- 6.
In a meta-analysis, of 27 studies of smiling during deception, only two did so (DePaulo et al. 2003).
- 7.
This could also be explained by differences in the techniques of fiction and documentary.
- 8.
Thanks to Mark Bedau for pressing this point.
- 9.
In fact the opposite phenomenon is found. It has been noted that humans exhibit neoteny. That is, childhood traits persisting through adulthood to an unexpected degree (Gould 1977).
References
Alexander, J. 2007. The structural evolution of morality. Cambridge: CUP.
Bakeman, R., and L. Adamson. 1984. Coordinating attention to people and objects in mother-infant and peer-infant interaction. Child Development 55: 1278–1289.
Binmore, K. 1994. Game theory and the social contract: Volume I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Binmore, K. 2005. Natural justice. Oxford: OUP.
Boesch, C., and H. Boesch-Achermann. 2000. The chimpanzees of the Taï forest. Oxford: OUP.
Bond, C., and B. DePaulo. 2006. Accuracy of deception judgements. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10: 214–234.
Brosig, J. 2002. Identifying cooperative behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 47: 275–290.
Charlesworth, B. 1980. Evolution in age-structured populations. Cambridge: CUP.
Crossman, A., and M. Lewis. 2006. Adults’ ability to detect children’s lying. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 24: 703–715.
Damasio, A. 2000. The feeling of what happens. London: Vintage.
DePaulo, B., J. Lindsay, B. Malone, L. Muhlenbruck, K. Charlton, and H. Cooper. 2003. Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin 129: 74–118.
Ekman, P. 1992. Telling lies, 2nd ed. New York: Norton.
Ekman, P. 2003. Darwin, deception and facial expression. Annals of the New York Academy of the Sciences 1000: 205–221.
Ekman, P. 2009. Lie catching and microexpressions. In The philosophy of deception, ed. C. Martin, 118–135. Oxford: OUP.
Ekman, P., W. Friesen, and J. Hager. 2002. Facial action coding system, 2nd ed. Salt Lake City: Research Nexus.
Elster, J. 2000. Ulysses unbound. Cambridge: CUP.
Fernández-Dols, J., and M. Ruiz-Belda. 1997. Spontaneous facial behaviour during intense emotional episodes. In The psychology of facial expression, eds. J. Russell and J. Fernández-Dols, 255–274. Cambridge: CUP.
Fetchenhauer, D., T. Groothuis, and J. Pradel. 2010. Not only states but traits. Evolution and Human Behavior 31: 80–86.
Flinn, M., R. Quinlan, K. Coe, and C. Ward. 2007. Evolution of the human family. In Family relationships, eds. C. Salmon and T. Shackelford, 16–38. Oxford: OUP.
Frank, R. 1988. Passions within reason. New York: Norton.
Frank, S. 1998. Foundations of social evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Frank, R., T. Gilovich, and D. Regan. 1993. The evolution of one-shot cooperation. Ethology and Sociobiology 14: 247–256.
Gauthier, D. 1986. Morals by agreement. Oxford: OUP.
Gosselin, P., G. Kirouac, and F. Dore. 1995. Components and recognition of facial expression in the communication of emotion by actors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68: 83–96.
Gould, S. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hrdy, S. 2009. Mothers and others. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kuze, N., T. Malim, and S. Kohshima. 2005. Developmental changes in the facial morphology of the Borneo orangutan. American Journal of Primatology 65: 353–376.
Ledoux, J. 1998. The emotional brain. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
McElreath, R., and R. Boyd. 2007. Mathematical models of social evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ockenfels, A., and R. Selten. 2000. An experiment on the hypothesis of involuntary truth-signalling in bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior 33: 90–116.
Porter, S., and L. ten Brinke. 2008. Reading between the lies. Psychological Science 19: 508–514.
Pradel, J., H. Euler, and D. Fetchenhauer. 2009. Spotting altruistic dictator game players and mingling with them. Evolution and Human Behavior 30: 103–113.
Reisenzein, R., S. Bördgen, T. Holtbernd, and D. Matz. 2006. Evidence for strong dissociation between emotion and facial displays. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91: 295–315.
Riley, J. 2001. Rising life expectancy. Cambridge: CUP.
Robson, A. 1990. Efficiency in evolutionary games. Journal of Theoretical Biology 144: 379–396.
Rose, M. 1991. The evolutionary biology of aging. Oxford: OUP.
Russell, C., L. Adamson, and K. Bard. 1997. Social referencing by young chimpanzees. Journal of Comparative Psychology 111: 185–193.
Salmon, C. 2005. Parental investment and parent-offspring conflict. In The handbook of evolutionary psychology, ed. D. Buss, 506–527. Hoboken: Wiley.
Scharlemann, P., C. Eckel, A. Kacelnik, and R. Wilson. 2001. The value of a smile. Journal of Economic Psychology 22: 617–640.
Schug, J., D. Matsumoto, Y. Horita, T. Yamagishi, and K. Bonnet. 2010. Emotional expressivity as a signal of cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior 31: 87–94.
Skyrms, B. 1996. Evolution of the social contract. Cambridge: CUP.
Skyrms, B. 2000. Game theory, rationality and evolution of the social contract. In Evolutionary origins of morality, ed. L. Katz, 269–284. Thorverton: Imprint Academic.
Stanislavski, C. 2008. An actor prepares. London: Methuen.
Verplaetse, J., S. Vanneste, and J. Braeckman. 2007. You can judge a book by its cover. Evolution and Human Behavior 28: 260–271.
West, S., A. Griffin, and A. Gardner. 2007. Social semantics. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 415–432.
Yamagishi, T., S. Tanida, R. Mashima, E. Shimoma, and S. Kanazawa. 2003. You can judge a book by its cover. Evolution and Human Behavior 24: 290–301.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to audiences at the University of Bristol and EPSA09 for helpful discussions and to Ken Binmore and two anonymous referees for very useful comments. Research funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council project “Evolution, Cooperation and Rationality”. Grant AH/F017502/1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Grose, J. (2012). Genuine versus Deceptive Emotional Displays. In: de Regt, H., Hartmann, S., Okasha, S. (eds) EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2404-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2404-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2403-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2404-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)