Informal Learning: A Vital Component of Lifelong Learning

Chapter
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 26)

Abstract

The burgeoning interest in lifelong learning since the 1990s has been influenced strongly by the scope and significance of the 1970s debates about lifelong education and other related but different concepts, such as ‘recurrent education’ and ‘education permanente’. This diversity of concepts ensured that the 1970s debates were marked by significant ambiguities and conflicting interpretations (Hager and Halliday 2006, pp. 16–19).

Keywords

Lifelong Learning Informal Learning Formal Learning Workplace Learning Actor Network Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Archer, M. (1998). Realism and morphogenesis. In R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  4. Edwards, R., & Nicoll, K. (2004). Mobilizing workplaces: Actors, discipline and governmentality. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elkjaer, B. (2003). Organizational learning with a pragmatic slant. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(5), 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Towards an activity-theoretical reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.Google Scholar
  8. Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fenwick, T. (2009). Re-thinking the “thing”: Sociomaterial approaches to understanding and researching learning at work. Paper presented at the 6th international conference on researching work and learning, Roskilde University, Denmark, June 28–July 1, 2009.Google Scholar
  10. Field, J. (2004). Lifelong learning and cultural change: A European perspective. Paper presented at the Conference on Lifelong Learning and New Learning Culture, National Chung-Cheng University, Chia-Yi, Taiwan, October 1–2, 2004. Available at www.ioe.stir.ac.uk/staff/docs/field-lifelonglearning.pdf. Accessed November 20, 2009.
  11. Field, J. (2006). Lifelong learning and the new educational order (2nd ed.). Stoke on Trent/Sterling: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  12. Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2003). Learning as apprentices in the contemporary UK workplace: Creating and managing expansive and restrictive participation. Journal of Education and Work, 16(4), 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2004). Expansive learning environments: Integrating organisational and personal development. In H. Rainbird et al. (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 126–44). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Gherardi, S. (2006) Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning (with the collaboration of D. Nicolini). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2000). To transfer is to transform: The circulation of safety knowledge. Organization, 7(2), 329–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guile, D., & Okumoto, K. (2007). Developing vocational practice in the jewelry sector through the incubation of a new “project-object”. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(4), 252–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guile, D., & Young, M. (1999). Beyond the Institution of Apprenticeship: Towards a social theory of learning as the production of knowledge. In P. Ainley & H. Rainbird (Eds.), Apprenticeship: Towards a new paradigm of learning (pp. 111–28). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  18. Guile, D., & Young, M. (2003). Transfer and transition in vocational education: some theoretical considerations. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 63–81). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  19. Hager, P. (2011). Theories of workplace learning. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. N. O’Connor (Eds.), The Sage handbook of workplace learning (pp. 17–31). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Hager, P., & Halliday, J. (2006). Recovering informal learning: Wisdom, judgement and community. Dordrecht: Springer (re-issued in paperback 2009).Google Scholar
  21. Hager, P., & Hodkinson, P. (2009). Moving beyond the metaphor of transfer of learning. British Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 619–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hodkinson, H., & Hodkinson, P. (2004). Rethinking the concept of community of practice in relation to schoolteachers’ workplace learning. International Journal of Training and Development, 8(1), 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G., & James, D. (2008). Understanding learning culturally: Overcoming the dualism between social and individual views of learning. Vocations and Learning, 1(1), 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Marsick, V., & Watkins, K. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Mulcahy, D. (2007). (Re)working relations of strategy and spatiality in education. Studies in Continuing Education, 29(2), 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (Eds.). (2003). Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  28. Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2007). ‘Beyond presence: Epistemological and pedagogical implications of “strong” emergence”. Interchange, 38(1), 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rainbird, H., Fuller, A., & Munro, A. (Eds.). (2004). Workplace learning in context. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education, 23, 1–24.Google Scholar
  31. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  32. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  33. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.Google Scholar
  34. Shotter, J. (2008). Dialogism and polyphony in organizing theorizing in organization studies: Action guiding anticipations and the continuous creation of novelty. Organization Studies, 29(4), 501–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stacey, R. (2005). Experiencing emergence in organizations: Local interaction and the emergence of global pattern. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Stacey, R., & Griffin, D. (Eds.). (2005). A complexity perspective on researching organizations: Local taking experience seriously. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Tsoukas, H. (2005). Afterword: Why language matters in the analysis of organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(1), 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (Eds.). (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  40. Usher, R., & Edwards, R. (2007). Lifelong learning – Signs, discourses, practices. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Wain, K. (1987). Philosophy of lifelong education. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  42. Wain, K. (1993). Lifelong education: Illiberal and repressive? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 25(1), 58–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesUniversity of TechnologySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations