Advertisement

Local Embeddedness and Global Links in Rural Areas: Euclidean and Relational Space in Business Networks

  • Alexandre Dubois
  • Andrew Copus
  • Moa Hedström
Chapter
Part of the GeoJournal Library book series (GEJL, volume 103)

Abstract

Rural regions and small businesses are often assumed to be marginalised in relation to globalisation, which is perceived to be an urban phenomenon. However, emerging rural business network configurations contradict this commonly held view. This chapter presents an investigation of spatial and ‘relational’ structures in business networks of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in rural areas of five European countries. It argues that successful and dynamic firms derive ‘networking economies’ from frequent and effective interaction, both within the local business environment and with a more extensive set of linkages stretching out across Europe. New communication technologies allow entrepreneurs to communicate with contacts and institutional sources without the geographic limitations that would have hampered them just a decade ago. Actors such as local and county authorities, professional associations and European-funded business advisors increasingly act as ‘network brokers’ for local SMEs. In this way, ‘organised proximity’ is increasingly independent of geographic space, providing rural business with an alternative to agglomeration as a competition strategy.

Keywords

Small Firm Business Network Relational Space Case Study Area Case Study Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amin, A. (1998). Globalisation and regional development: A relational perspective. Competition and Change, 3, 145–165.Google Scholar
  2. Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1994). Living in the global. In A. Amin & N. Thrift (Eds.), Globalization, institutions, and regional development in Europe (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  5. Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chetty, S., & Blankenburg Holm, D. (2000). Internationalisation of small to medium-sized manufacturing firms: A network approach. International business Review, 9, 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooke, P. N., & Morgan, K. (1993). The network paradigm: New departures in corporate and regional development. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11, 543–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Copus, A., Hall, C., Barnes, A., Dalton, G., Cook, P., Weingarten, P., et al. (2006). Study on employment in rural areas (SERA). Report for the European Commission, DG AGRI, Brussels. Retrieved April 22, 2011, from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/reports/ruralemployment/sera_report.pdf
  9. Dicken, P. (2007). Global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy (5th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. (1999). The spatial economy. Cities, regions and international trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Garretsen, H., & Martin, R. (2010). Rethinking (new) economic geography models: Taking geography and history more seriously. Spatial Economic Analysis, 5(2), 127–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herdzina, K., Findeis, A., Fleischmann, S., Wander, C., Piasecki, B., & Rogut, A. (2004). European rural SMEs in the context of globalization and enlargement. In L. Labrianidis (Ed.), The future of Europe’s rural peripheries (pp. 86–113). England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  15. Holmlund, M., Kock, S., & Vanyushyn, V. (2007). Small and medium-sized enterprises’ internationalisation and the influence of importing on exporting. International Small Business Journal, 25, 459–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L. G. (1988). Internationalization in industrial systems – A network approach. In N. Hood & J. E Vahlne (Eds.), Strategies in global competition (pp. 303–321). New York: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  17. Johansson, B., & Quigley, J. M. (2004). Agglomeration and networks in spatial economics papers. Regional Science, 83, 165–176.Google Scholar
  18. Kaufmann, A., & Tödtling, F. (2000). Systems of innovation in traditional industrial regions: The case of Styria in a comparative perspective. Regional Studies, 34(1), 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kingsley, G., & Malecki, E. J. (2004). Networking for competitiveness. Small Business Economics, 23, 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. Leuven: Leuven University Press; Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Krugman, P. (1994). The rise and fall of development economics. In L. Rodwin & D. Schoen (Eds.), Rethinking the development experience (pp. 39–58). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
  22. Lechner, C., & Dowling, M. (2003). Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Nederveen, P. (1994). Globalisation as hybridization. International Sociology, 9(2), 161–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nummela, N., Loane, S., & Bell, J. (2006). Change in SME internationalisation – An Irish perspective. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(4), 562–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. OECD. (1997). Globalisation and small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  27. Oerlemans, L. A. G., & Meeus, M. T. H. (2005). Do organizational and spatial proximity impact on firm performance? Regional Studies, 39(1), 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rallet, A. (2002). L’économie de proximités – Propos d’étape. Etudes Recherche Systeme Agraires Développement, 33, 11–25.Google Scholar
  29. Storper, M. (1995). The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. European Urban and Regional Studies, 3, 191–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Tödtling, F., & Kaufmann, A. (1999). Innovation systems in regions of Europe – A comparative perspective. European Planning Studies, 7(6), 699–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Torre, A., & Gilly, J. P. (2000). On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics. Regional Studies, 34(2), 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Veltz, P. (1996). Mondialisation Villes et Territoires. L’économie d’archipel. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  35. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Weber, A. (1929). Theory of the location of industries. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Winch, G. W., & Bianchi, C. (2006). Drivers and dynamic processes for SMEs going global. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(1), 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yeung, H. W. (2000). Reconceptualising the ‘firm’ in new economic geographies: An organisational perspective. Paper presented at the workshop on “The Firm” in Economic Geography, March 9–11, 2000, University of Portsmouth, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nordregio – Nordic Centre for Spatial DevelopmentStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations