Transitions in Individual Vocational Education Pathways: Challenges and Collaborative Solutions

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter draws upon some of the main results of two Finnish nationwide case studies on how common efforts of education providers and organizations’ personnel support VET (vocational education and training) students along their individual learning paths. The first study concerns best practices to prevent early leaving, and the second was a Finnish national pilot programme to assist uncertain students who have somewhat weak prerequisites to enter vocational education. Some excellent solutions are presented, but special challenges for the learner, organization and staff are also revealed. The solutions for excellence promote practices, strategies and structures that support students’ transitions from one educational level to another. Both the solutions and challenges are investigated through the idea of distributed pedagogical leadership, where special characteristics of a professional learning community constitute a productive pedagogical space wherein all stakeholders take multi-professional responsibility for the students’ learning and education. In such a space, learners have an essential influence over their own learning.

Keywords

Vocational Education Pilot Programme Education Provider Professional Learning Community Pedagogical Leadership 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Beckett, D., & Hager, P. (2002). Life, work, and learning: Practice in postmodernity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Cedefop (2009a). Continuity, consolidation and change. Towards a European era of vocational education and training. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  3. Cedefop (2009b). Finland. VET in Europe (Country Report). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  4. Clarke, L., & Winch, C. (2007). Vocational education: International approaches, developments and systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Day, C., Sammons, P., Stobart, G., Kington, A., & Gu, Q. (2007). Teachers matter: Connecting work, lives and effectiveness. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (2008a, July 3). Green paper, Migration & mobility: Challenges and opportunities for EU education systems. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission (2008b). Information from European Union institutions and bodies. Official Journal of the European Union, 2008/C 86/01.Google Scholar
  10. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gronn, P. (2008). The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris, A. (2009). Distributed leadership: What we know. In A. Harris (Ed.), Distributed leadership (pp. 11–24). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hernes, T. (2004). The spatial construction of organization. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  15. Jäppinen, A.-K. (2005a). Cognitional development of mathematics and science in the Finnish mainstream education in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) – Teaching through a foreign language. Language and Education, 19(2), 148–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jäppinen, A.-K. (2005b). Monikielinen työelämä korkea-asteen ja ammatillisen koulutuksen uutena haasteena [Multilingual Working Life Challenging Higher and Vocational Education; in Finnish]. Ammattikasvatuksen aikakauskirja, 7(4), 30–40.Google Scholar
  17. Jäppinen, A.-K. (2006). CLIL and future learning. In M. Bergström, S. Björklund, K. Mård-Miettinen, & M. Södergård (Eds.), Exploring dual-focussed education. Integrating language and content for individual and societal needs (Proceedings and Reports No. 132, pp. 22–37). Vaasa, Finland: University of Vaasa.Google Scholar
  18. Jäppinen, A.-K. (2007). Kiinni ammattiin – ote opintoihin. Keskeyttämisen vähentäminen ammatillisessa peruskoulutuksessa [Fixing to the occupation – grasping the studies. Reducing drop-out in vocational education; in Finnish] (Publications of the Finnish Ministry of Education, Vol. 27). Helsinki, Finland: Yliopistopaino.Google Scholar
  19. Jäppinen, A.-K. (2009). Get a vocation – keeping on top of studies. Reducing the drop-out rate in vocational upper secondary education and training. European Journal of Vocational Training, 47, 28–49.Google Scholar
  20. Jäppinen, A.-K. (2010a). Onnistujia opinpolun siirtymissä [Successful transitions in the individual learning pathways; in Finnish]. National Board of Education. Jyväskylä, Finland: Jyväskylä College Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jäppinen, A.-K. (2010b). Preventing early leaving in VET: Distributed pedagogical leadership in characterizing five types of successful organizations. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 62(3), 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lakomski, C. (2008). Functionally adequate but causally idle: W(h)ither distributed leadership? Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (Eds.). (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Finnish Institute for Educational Research, University of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations