Advertisement

The CAP Beyond 2013

  • Emil Erjavec
  • Frédéric Chantreuil
  • Trevor Donnellan
  • Roberto Esposti
  • Kevin F. Hanrahan
  • Myrna van Leeuwen
  • Petra Salamon
  • Guna Salputra
Chapter

Abstract

The main purpose of the chapter is to demonstrate a policy analysis application of the AGMEMOD model and to provide an illustration of the range of policy scenarios that can be analysed using the AGMEMOD model. Specific results are provided for a scenario which looks at the impact of equalizing the level of direct payments per hectare across the EU. We thus present, in this chapter, the results for different alternate policy scenarios along the EU and individual Member States dimensions, illustrating the appropriateness of the policy harmonization approach for such analysis.

Keywords

Common Agricultural Policy EU Budget Regional flat rate EU-wide flat rate SPS abolishment Partial equilibrium sector modelling Agmemod model 

References

  1. Begg I (2005) Funding the European Union. A federal trust report on the European Union’s budget. The Federal Trust for Education and Research, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Begg I, Heinemann F (2006) New budget, old dilemmas. Briefing Note, Centre for European Reform, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Begg I, Sapir A, Eriksson J (2008) The purse of the European Union: setting priorities for the future. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckwell A (2007) Next step in the CAP reform. EuroChoices 6(2):13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bureau JC, Mahé LP (2008) CAP reform beyond 2013: an idea for a longer view. Notre Europe Studies and Research No. 64. Notre Europe, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. Burfisher ME, Hopkins J (2003) Decoupled payments: household income transfers in contemporary U.S. agriculture. Agricultural Economic Report No. 822, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service (ERS), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Chau NH, de Gorter H (2005) Disentangling the consequences of direct payment schemes in agriculture on fixed costs, exit decisions, and output. Am J Agr Econ 87(5):1174–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cipriani G (2007) Rethinking the EU budget: three unavoidable reforms. Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  9. Daugbjerg C, Swinbank A (2007) The politics of CAP reform: trade negotiations, institutional settings and blame avoidance. J Common Market Stud 45:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ECORYS (2008) A study on EU spending. Final Report. Commissioned by the European Commission, Directorate General for Budget, Contract No. 30-CE-0121821/00-57. ECORYS Nederland BV, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. Esposti R (2008) Reforming the CAP: an agenda for regional growth. 109th seminar of the European association of agricultural economists. Viterbo, Italy, 20–21 Nov 2008Google Scholar
  12. Garzon I (2006) Reforming the common agricultural policy: history of a paradigm change. Palgrave Macmillan, HoundmillsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grybauskaité D (2008). Reforming the budget, changing Europe: results of the public consultation. Plenary presentation at budget conference “Reforming the Budget, Changing Europe”, Brussels, 12 November 2008. Available via http://ec.europa.eu/budget/reform/library/conference/intro_grybauskaite.pdf. Cited 21 June 2011
  14. Hennessy DA (1998) The production effects of agricultural income support policies under uncertainty. Am J Agr Econ 80:46–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. OECD (2001) Decoupling: a conceptual overview. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. OECD (2003) Multifunctionality – towards an analytical framework. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Paris, ParisGoogle Scholar
  17. Roe T, Somwaru A, Diao X (2003) Do direct payments have intertemporal effects on US agriculture? In: Moss CB, Schmitz A (eds) Government policy and farmland markets. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  18. Salputra G, Chantreuil F, Hanrahan KF, Donnellan T, Van Leeuwen M, Erjavec E (2011) Policy harmonized approach for the EU agricultural sector modelling. Agric Food Sci 20(2): 119-130.Google Scholar
  19. Swinnen JFM (2008) The perfect storm – the political economy of the Fischler reforms of the common agricultural policy. Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  20. Yrjölä T, Kola J (2004) Consumer preferences regarding multifunctional agriculture. Int Food Agribusiness Man Rev 7(1):78–90Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science +Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emil Erjavec
    • 1
  • Frédéric Chantreuil
    • 2
  • Trevor Donnellan
    • 3
  • Roberto Esposti
    • 4
  • Kevin F. Hanrahan
    • 3
  • Myrna van Leeuwen
    • 5
  • Petra Salamon
    • 6
  • Guna Salputra
    • 7
  1. 1.Biotechnical FacultyUniversity of LjubljanaDomžaleSlovenia
  2. 2.UFR Sciences Economiques et GestionUniversité de Caen Basse NormandieCaen cedexFrance
  3. 3.Rural Economy Research CentreTeagascCo GalwayIreland
  4. 4.Department of EconomicsUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly
  5. 5.LEI Wageningen URThe HagueThe Netherlands
  6. 6.Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI)BrunswickGermany
  7. 7.Latvia State Institute of Agrarian EconomicsRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations