Relational Tourism: Observations on Families and Travel

  • Jay A. Mancini
  • Deepu V. George
  • Bryce L. Jorgensen
Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)

Abstract

Experiences with travel and tourism can often be described as relational tourism because of the interpersonal and familial context in which these activities occur. There are two very general approaches to understanding relational tourism, one involving a life cycle orientation and the other focused on family interaction and transaction. Five elements of the relational tourism life cycle are described, beginning with formal organization opportunities and ending with over-the-horizon planning. Individual and family experiences are presented within each element. Then three primary ways of viewing family dynamics are presented, including social exchange, symbolic interaction, and family systems perspectives. The combination of these life cycle and family dynamics approaches provide a more informed method for understanding the quality of family life as it relates to relational tourism.

Keywords

Social Exchange Family System Family Cohesion Family Dynamic Family Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Krasner, B. R. (1986). Between give and take: A clinical guide to contextual therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  2. Burgess, R. L., & Huston, T. L. (1979). Social exchanges in developing relationships. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  3. Goldenberg, H., & Goldenberg, I. (2007). Family therapy: An overview. Belmont: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  4. LaRossa, R., & Reitzes, D. C. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135–163). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mancini, J. A., & Bowen, G. L. (2012). Families and communities: A social organization theory of action and change. In G. Peterson & K. Bush (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Mancini, J. A., Bowen, G. L., & Martin, J. A. (2005). Community social organization: A conceptual linchpin in examining families in the context of communities. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 54, 570–582.Google Scholar
  7. Orthner, D., & Mancini, J. A. (1980). Leisure behavior and group dynamics: The case of the family. In S. Iso-Ahola (Ed.), Social-psychological perspectives on leisure and recreation (pp. 307–328). Springfield: Thomas.Google Scholar
  8. Orthner, D. K., & Mancini, J. A. (1991). Benefits of leisure for family bonding. In B. L. Driver, P. J. Brown, & G. L. Peterson (Eds.), Benefits of leisure (pp. 289–301). State College: Venture Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Orthner, D. K., Barnett-Morris, L., & Mancini, J. A. (1994). Leisure and family over the life cycle. In L. L’Abate (Ed.), Handbook of developmental family psychology and psychopathology (pp. 176–201). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Ventegodt, S., Merrick, J., & Andersen, N. J. (2003). The IQOL theory: An integrative theory of the global quality of life concept. The Scientific World Journal, 3, 1030–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jay A. Mancini
    • 1
  • Deepu V. George
    • 2
  • Bryce L. Jorgensen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Child and Family DevelopmentUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Department of Child and Family Development, Family and Community Resilience LaboratoryUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  3. 3.Child Development and Family Relations, College of Human EcologyEast Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations