Spatial Science and Its Traditions

  • Jay D. Gatrell
  • Gregory D. Bierly
  • Ryan R. Jensen
Chapter

Abstract

Research design is the critical process that transforms an idea, interest, or question from “just a thought” into a meaningful and purposeful investigation of social or physical processes. The central emphasis of research design is the process itself. For this reason, research design does not refer to the end product, the results, a new grand theory, or a specific methodology. Rather, research design is an iterative process that is an on-going negotiation between the researcher, peers, and the standards of good science. This process transcends discipline, epistemology, or subfield. Indeed, social and natural scientists alike must undertake the same steps to distill the essence of a research question and design a successful project.

Keywords

Geographic Information System Geographic Information System Research Proposal Innate Interest Grand Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abler R, Adams J, Gould P (1971) Spatial organization. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  2. Bossler JD (2002) An introduction to geospatial science and technology. In: Bossler JD (ed) The manual of geospatial science and technology. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 3–7Google Scholar
  3. Doel M (1999) Poststructuralist geographies: the diabolical art of spatial science. Rowman & Littlefield, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  4. Doreian P (1981) Estimating linear models with spatially distributed data. In: Leinhardt S (ed) Sociological methodology. Jossey-Bass, Francisco, pp 359–388Google Scholar
  5. Formica V, Gonser R, Ramsay S, Tuttle E (2004) Spatial dynamics of alternative reproductive strategies: the role of neighbors. Ecology 85:1125–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lichstein J, Simons T, Shriner S, Franzreb K (2003) Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models. Ecol Monogr 72:445–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pattison W (1964) The four traditions of geography. J Geogr 63(5):211–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Robinson J (1976) A new look at the four traditions of geography. J Geogr 75:520–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Smith T, Mathae K (2004) National Science Foundation in the FY 2005 budget. AAAS report XXIX: research & development FY2005. http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/05pch7.htm
  10. Soja E (1980) The socio-spatial dialectic. Annals 70:207–225Google Scholar
  11. Urban D (2003) ENV 352 Spatial Analysis in Ecology. Landscape Ecology Laboratory, Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University. http://www.nicholas.duke.edu/landscape/classes/env352/env352.html

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jay D. Gatrell
    • 1
  • Gregory D. Bierly
    • 1
  • Ryan R. Jensen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Earth & Environmental SystemsIndiana State UniversityTerre HauteUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeographyBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Personalised recommendations