• Alan Wilson
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Geography book series (BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY)


Models are representations of theories. Theories are built out of concepts and a knowledge of these concepts should be part of our tool kit. At the lowest level, these concepts are essentially system descriptors—and many of our model variables fall into this category; at higher levels, they can function as elements of theories which give us a deeper level of understanding. As a framework, we can take Fig. 1.1 from Chap. 1 which sets out the main elements of an urban or regional system and which is repeated here for convenience.


Utility Function Market Area Aggregation Problem Spatial System Spatial Interaction Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alonso W (1960) A theory of the urban land market. Pap Reg Sci Assoc 6:149–157Google Scholar
  2. Arrow KJ (1951) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Burgess EW (1927) The determinants of gradients in the growth of a city. Publ Am Sociological Soc 21:178–184Google Scholar
  4. Carey HC (1858) Principles of social science. Lippincott, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  5. Christaller W (1933) Die centralen Orte in Suddeutschland, Gustav Fischer, Jena; translated by Baskin CW Central places in Southern Germany, Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  6. Cronon W (1992) Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the great west. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Giddens A (1979) Central problems in social theory. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  8. Green HAJ (1964) Aggregation in economic analysis. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris CD, Ullman EL (1945) The nature of cities. Ann Am Acad Political Social Sci 242:7–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herbert DJ, Stevens BH (1960) A model for the distribution of residential activity in an urban area. J Regional Sci 2:21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoyt H (1939) The structure and growth of residential neighbourhoods in American cities. Federal Housing Administration, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. Lill E (1891) Das reisegesetz und seine anwendung auf den eisenbahnverkehr, Wien; cited in Erlander and Stewart (1990)Google Scholar
  13. Losch A (1940) Die raumliche ordnung der wirtschaft, Gustav Fischer, Jena; translated by Woglam WH, Stolper WF (1954) The economics of location, Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  14. Paelink JHP, Nijkamp P (1975) Operational theory and method in regional economics. Saxon House, FarnboroughGoogle Scholar
  15. Ravenstein EG (1885) The laws of migration. J Roy Stat Soc 48:167–227Google Scholar
  16. Reilly WJ (1931) The law of retail gravitation. G.P. Putman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Stewart JQ (1942) A measure of the influence of population at a distance. Sociometry 5:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. von Thunen JH (1826) Der isolierte staat in beziehung auf landwirtschaft und nationalokonomie, Gustav Fisher, Stuttgart; English translation. In: Wartenburg CM (ed) The isolated state. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1966)Google Scholar
  19. Weber A (1909) Uber den standort der industrien, Tubingen; English translation. In: Friedrich CJ (ed) Theory of the location of industries. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  20. Young EC (1924) The movement of farm population, bulletin 426, agriculture experiment station. Cornell University, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  21. Zipf GK (1946) The P1P2/D hypothesis on the inter-city movement of persons. Am Sociological Rev 11:677–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Wilson AG (2000) Complex spatial systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, Chapter 7Google Scholar
  2. Wilson AG (2010) Knowledge power. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Advanced Spatial AnalysisUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations