Advertisement

The Architecture of Medical Knowledge

  • Kazem Sadegh-Zadeh
Chapter
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 113)

Abstract

Fragmentary medical-epistemological thoughts are put forward in medical journals and books every day. But there is as yet no medical epistemology as an established area of inquiry. As a result, no methodology is available to instruct us about how to conduct medical epistemology. To establish a field of medical epistemology with well-identified problems, issues, and a specific methodology, requires an answer to the question: What is medical epistemology and what is it needed for?

Keywords

Potential Model Medical Knowledge Intended Application Theoretical Term Beam Balance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, 1955.
    Adams EW. Axiomatic Foundations of Rigid Body Mechanics. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, 1955.Google Scholar
  2. Adlassnig, 1980.
    Adlassnig K-P. A fuzzy logical model of computer-assisted medical diagnosis. Methods Inform Med 1980; 19:141–148.Google Scholar
  3. Audi, 2003.
    Audi R. Epistemology. A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. Balzer, 1978.
    Balzer W. Empirische Geometrie und Raum-Zeit-Theorie in mengentheoretischer Darstellung. Kronberg: Scriptor-Verlag, 1978.Google Scholar
  5. Balzer and Moulines, 1996.
    Balzer W, and Moulines CU (eds.). Structuralist Theory of Science. Focal Issues, New Results. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1996.Google Scholar
  6. Balzer and Sneed, 1977.
    Balzer W, and Sneed JD. Generalized net structures of empirical theories: I. Studia Logica 1977; 36:195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balzer and Sneed, 1978.
    Balzer W, and Sneed JD. Generalized net structures of empirical theories: II. Studia Logica 1978; 37:167–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coyne, 2009.
    Coyne JA. Why Evolution is True. New York: Penguin Group Inc., 2009.Google Scholar
  9. da Costa and French, 2003.
    da Costa NCA, and French S. Science and Partial Truth. A Unitary Approach to Models and Scientific Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  10. Duhem, 1954.
    Duhem P. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theories. Translated by P Wiener and foreworded by PL de Broglie (French original published 1906). Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
  11. Ehrlich, 1891.
    Ehrlich P. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über Immunität. I. Über Ricin. Deutsche Medicinische Wochenschrift 1891; 17:976–979. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über Immunität. II. Über Albrin. Deutsche Medicinische Wochenschrift 1891; 17:1218–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feyerabend, 1960.
    Feyerabend PK. Das Problem der Existenz theoretischer Entitäten. In: Topitsch E (ed.), Probleme der Wissenschaftstheorie. Festschrift für Victor Kraft. Vienna: Springer-Verlag, 1960.Google Scholar
  13. Gettier, 1963.
    Gettier E, Jr. Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis 1963; 23:121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanson, 1958.
    Hanson NR. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  15. Hawkes, 2003.
    Hawkes T. Structuralism and Semiotics. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
  16. Jamison, 1956.
    Jamison BN. An Axiomatic Treatment of Langrange’s Equations. M.S. Thesis. Stanford: Stanford University, 1956.Google Scholar
  17. Kuhn, 1996.
    Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996. (First published 1962.)Google Scholar
  18. Lehrer, 2000.
    Lehrer K. Theory of Knowledge. Boulder: Westview Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  19. McKinsey and Suppes, 1955.
    McKinsey JCC, and Suppes P. On the notion of invariance in classical mechanics. Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 1955; 5:290–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miller, 1974.
    Miller D. Poppers’s qualitative theory of verisimilitude. Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 1974; 25:155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moulines, 1975.
    Moulines CU. A logical reconstruction of simple equilibrium thermodynamics. Erkenntnis 1975; 9:101–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mueller-Kolck, 2010.
    Mueller-Kolck U. The Logical Structure of Clinical Medicine. Norderstedt, Germany: Books on Demand, 2010.Google Scholar
  23. Müller, 1985.
    Müller U. Die Struktur der Ionentheorie der Erregung von A.L. Hodgkin, A.F. Huxley und B. Katz. Tecklenburg: Burgverlag, 1985.Google Scholar
  24. Müller and Pilatus, 1982.
    Müller U, and Pilatus S. On Hodgkin and Huxley’s theory of excitable membranes. Metamedicine 1982; 3:193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pilatus, 1985.
    Pilatus S. Die Struktur der Assoziations-Induktions-Theorie von Gilbert Ning Ling. Burgverlag: Tecklenburg, 1985.Google Scholar
  26. Plato, 1973.
    Plato. Theaetetus. Translated by John McDowell. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  27. Popper, 1978.
    Popper, Karl Raimund. Natural selection and the emergence of mind. Dialectica 1978; 32:339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Putnam, 1962.
    Putnam HW. What theories are not. In: Nagel E, Suppes P, and Tarski A (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, pp. 240–251. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  29. Quine, 1951.
    Quine WVO. Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review 1951; 60:20–43. Reprinted in [Quine, 1963], pp. 20–46. All page references are to the reprinted version.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Quine, 1966.
    Quine WVO. Methods of Logic. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966.Google Scholar
  31. Rosse and Mejino, 2008.
    Rosse C, and Mejino JL, Jr. The foundational model of anatomy ontology. In: Burger A, Davidson D, and Baldock R (eds.), Anatomy Ontologies for Bioinformatics, pp. 59–117. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sadegh-Zadeh, 1982a.
    Sadegh-Zadeh K. Perception, illusion, and hallucination. Metamedicine 1982; 3:159–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saussure, 1916.
    Saussure F de. Course in General Linguistics (translated by Roy Harris). London: Duckworth, 1983. (First published 1916.)Google Scholar
  34. Seising, 2007b.
    Seising R. Between empiricism and rationalism: A layer of perception modeling fuzzy sets as intermediary in philosophy of science. In: Melin P, Castillo O, Aguilar LT, Kacprzyk J, and Pedrycz W (eds.), IFSA 2007. LNCS, Vol. 4529, pp. 101–108. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
  35. Seising, 2007c.
    Seising R. Scientific theories and the computational theory of perceptions: A structuralist view including fuzzy sets. In: Štepnika M, Novák V, and Bodenhofer U (eds.), New Dimensions in Fuzzy Logic and Related Technologies. Proceedings of the 5th EUSFLAT Conference (European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology). Ostrava, Czech Republic. Vol. 1, pp. 401–408.Google Scholar
  36. Seising, 2009.
    Seising R. Fuzzy sets and systems and philosophy of science. In: Seising R (ed.), Views on Fuzzy Sets and Systems, pp. 1–35. Berlin: Springer, 2009.Google Scholar
  37. Sneed, 1971.
    Sneed JD. The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sneed, 1976.
    Sneed JD. Philosophical problems in the empirical science of science: A formal approach. Erkenntnis 1976; 10:115–146.Google Scholar
  39. Stegmüller, 1973a.
    Stegmüller W. Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie. Band II: Theorie und Erfahrung. Zweiter Halbband: Theorienstrukturen und Theoriendynamik. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1973. (English translation in [Stegmüller, 1976].)Google Scholar
  40. Stegmüller, 1976.
    Stegmüller W. The Structure and Dynamics of Theories. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1976.Google Scholar
  41. Stegmüller, 1979.
    Stegmüller W. The Structuralist View of Theories. A Possible Analogue of the Bourbaki Programme in Physical Science. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1979.Google Scholar
  42. Stegmüller, 1980.
    Stegmüller W. Neue Wege der Wissenschaftsphilosophie. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar
  43. Sturrock, 2003.
    Sturrock J. Structuralism. London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Suppe, 1977.
    Suppe F. The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  45. Suppe, 1989.
    Suppe F. The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  46. Suppes, 1951.
    Suppes P. A set of independent axioms for extensive quantities. Portugaliae Mathematica 1951; 10:163–172.Google Scholar
  47. Suppes, 1957.
    Suppes P. Introduction to Logic. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1957.Google Scholar
  48. Suppes, 1959.
    Suppes P. Axioms for relativistic kinematics with or without identity. In: Henkin L, Suppes P, and Tarski A (eds.), The Axiomatic Method, pp. 291–307. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ. Co., 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Suppes, 1960.
    Suppes P. A comparison of the meaning and uses of models in mathematics and the empirical sciences. Synthese 1960; 12:287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Suppes, 1962.
    Suppes P. Models of Data. In: Nagel E, Suppes P, and Tarski A (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, pp. 252–261. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  51. Suppes, 1967.
    Suppes P. What is a scientific theory? In: Morgenbesser S (ed.), Philosophy of Science Today, pp. 55–67. New York: Basic Books, 1967.Google Scholar
  52. Suppes, 1970b.
    Suppes P. Set-Theoretical Structures in Science. Mimeogr. Stanford, CA: Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, January 1970.Google Scholar
  53. Suppes, 2002.
    Suppes, P. Representation and Invariance of Scientific Structures. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 2002.Google Scholar
  54. Tichy, 1974.
    Tichy P. On Popper’s definitions of verisimilitude. Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 1974; 25:155–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van Fraassen, 1980.
    van Fraassen B. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  56. Virchow, 1855.
    Virchow R. Cellular-Pathologie. Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin 1855; 8:3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Westmeyer, 1989.
    Westmeyer H (ed.). Psychological Theories From A Structuralist Point of View. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989.Google Scholar
  58. Westmeyer, 1992.
    Westmeyer H (ed.). The Structuralist Program in Psychology: Foundations and Applications. Seatle: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Theory of Medicine DepartmentUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations