Skip to main content

Medicine is a Deontic Discipline

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Analytic Philosophy of Medicine

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 113))

  • 942 Accesses

Abstract

Vita brevis, ars longa. This is the Latin translation of the first two lines of an aphorism by Hippocrates which reads: O βιoς βραχυς, η δε τεχνη μακρη (Aphorims, section I, No. 1). It shows that in Ancient Greece medicine was viewed as an art, téchne. The view persisted in Western medicine until medical research joined the methodology of natural sciences in the late eighteenth century. The judgment soon emerged that medicine had been an unscientific endeavor in the past and had now become a scientific discipline: “Medicine will be a science, or it will not be” (Naunyn , 1909, 1348). The terms “science” and “scientific” were overtly identified with natural science. Any deviant approach was considered unscientific, e.g., humoral pathology and homeopathy, and had to be banished from medicine. Since then there is, between the proponents and opponents of this view, an ongoing debate on the ‘ nature of medicine’ concerned with whether medicine is a science or an art. We will not participate in this long-standing controversy because the very question is pointless for different reasons. For a detailed discussion on this issue, see Chapter 21 and (Marcum , 2008, 301 ff.).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 499.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Field MJ, and Lohr KN. Guidelines for Clinical Practice: Directions for a New Program. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academic Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ICDL. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Redefining the Standards of Care for Infants, Children and Families with Special Needs. Bethesda, MD: The Interdisciplinary Council on Developmental and Learning Disorders, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marcum JA. An Introductory Philosophy of Medicine: Humanizing Modern Medicine. Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Naunyn B. “Physicians and laymen” (in German, 1900). Reprinted in: Gesammelte Abhandlungen 1862–1909, Vol. 2, pp. 1327–1355. Würzburg: Stürtz, 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sadegh-Zadeh K. Zur Erkenntnismethodologie der modernen Medizin. Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsgeschichte 1974; 12:51–52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazem Sadegh-Zadeh .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sadegh-Zadeh, K. (2012). Medicine is a Deontic Discipline. In: Handbook of Analytic Philosophy of Medicine. Philosophy and Medicine(), vol 113. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2260-6_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics