Structural Characteristics of Legitimate Partner NGOs
Structural criteria for defining the legitimacy of NGOs as partners of corporations often focus on technical aspects. As a consequence, structural criteria might serve as indicators for the descriptive legitimacy of NGOs but not for their normative legitimacy. This becomes evident in attempts such as to define NGOs by assessing whether they qualify for tax-exempt status in accordance with the US Internal Revenue Code. Legal accountability must not be confused with normative legitimacy. It is however admitted that structural measures such as disclosure statements might help to reveal corporate front groups, which constitute the most extreme case of blurred boundaries between NGOs and interest groups. Yet, beyond that, the orientation to be gained from accountability mechanisms which NGOs deploy is often hampered by the fact that these mechanisms mainly address the requirements of governments and donors. When it comes to the accountability of NGOs to their constituency, structural criteria are not as unambiguous. It is argued that NGOs need to be linked to their activist constituency to some extent in order to receive input from the grassroots. But structural criteria do not help in assessing the right degree of proximity between NGOs and more radical groups. Structural criteria thus only provide limited normative orientation. They might help to reveal the blurred boundaries between NGOs and interest groups but in general they fail to capture the fine lines between the three actor types.
KeywordsCo-optation Corporate front groups Grassroots Upward accountability Downward accountability Non-membership organizations Democratic structures
- Albrow, M., and H. Anheier. “Introduction.” In Global Civil Society 2006/7, edited by M. Glasius, M. Kaldor, and H. Anheier, 1–15. London: Sage, 2005.Google Scholar
- Chandhoke, N. “How Global is Global Civil Society?” Journal of World-Systems Research XI (2) (2005): 355–71.Google Scholar
- Clark, J.D. “Ethical Globalization: The Dilemmas and Challenges of Internationalizing Civil Society”. In Global Citizen Action, edited by M. Edwards and G. John, 17–28. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar
- Edwards, M. NGO Rights and Responsibilities. A New Deal for Global Governance. London: The Foreign Policy Centre/NCVO, 2000.Google Scholar
- Edwards, M. “Introduction”. In Global Citizen Action, edited by M. Edwards and J. Gaventa, 1–14. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar
- Fowler, A. Civil Society, NGDOs and Social Development: Changing the Rules of the Game. Geneva: UNRISD, 2000.Google Scholar
- Fries, R. “The Legal Environment of Civil Society”. In The Global Civil Society Yearbook 2003, edited by M. Kaldor, H. Anheier, and M. Glasius, 221–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
- Hilhorst, D. The Real World of NGOs: Discourses, Diversity, and Development. London: Zed Books, 2003.Google Scholar
- Kaldor, M. Global Civil Society: An Answer to War. Cambridge (UK): Polity Press, 2003b.Google Scholar
- Kovach, H., C. Neligan, and S. Burall. Power Without Accountability? The One World Trust Global Accountability Report. London: One World Trust, 2003.Google Scholar
- Meadowcroft, J. “Democracy and Accountability: The Challenge for Cross-Sectoral Partnerships”. In Partnerships, Governance and Sustainable Development: Reflection on Theory and Practice, edited by P. Glasbergen, F. Biermann, and A.P.J. Mol, 194–213. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
- Mitlin, D. “The NGO Sector and its Role in Strengthening Civil Society and Securing Good Governance”. In Civil Society and International Development, edited by A. Bernard, H. Helmich, and P.B. Lehning, 81–96. Paris: OECD, 1998.Google Scholar
- Murphy, D.F., and J. Bendell. Partners in Time? Business, NGOs and Sustainable Development. Geneva: UNRISD, 1999.Google Scholar
- Nelson, P. “Information, Location, and Legitimacy: The Changing Bases of Civil Society Involvement in International Economic Policy”. In Global Citizen Action, edited by M. Edwards and J. Garaventa, 59–72. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar
- Suchman, M.C. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches”. Academy of Management Review 20 (3) (1995): 571–610.Google Scholar
- SustainAbility. The 21st Century NGO. In the Market for Change. London: SustainAbility, 2003.Google Scholar
- Uphoff, N.T. “Why NGOs Are Not a Third Sector: A Sectoral Analysis with Some Thoughts on Accountability, Sustainability and Evaluation. In Beyond the Magic Bullet: NGO Performance and Accountability in the Post-Cold War World, edited by M. Edwards and D. Hulme, 23–39. West Hartford: Kumarian Press, 1996.Google Scholar
- Warren, M.E. Democracy and Association. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
- Cater, N. “Oxfam to Shun Iraq Funds from Belligerent States.” 2003. First Accessed March 17, 2008. http://www.alertnet.org/thefacts/reliefresources/602345.htm.
- Covey, J., and D.L. Brown. “Critical Cooperation: An Alternative Form of Civil Society-Business Engagement”. IDR Reports 17 (1) (2001).Google Scholar
- Earth Policy Institute. “The Rise and Fall of the Global Climate Coalition.” 2006. First Accessed July 20, 2006. http://www.earth-policy.org/Alerts/Alert6.htm.
- Hari, J. “The Wrong Kind of Green”. The Nation, March 22, 2010.Google Scholar
- Hoffman, A.J. “Shades of Green”. Stanford Social Innovation Review Spring Issue (2009): 40–49.Google Scholar
- Leggewie, C. “Transnational Movements and the Question of Democracy.” 2003. First Accessed May 20, 2007. http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2003-02-03-leggewie-en.html.
- Multinational Monitor. “Untitled.” 2006. First Accessed August 20, 2006. http://www.multinationalmonitor.org/links/scat.php?scat_id=12.
- Neuman, W. “Save the Children Breaks with Soda Tax Effort”. The New York Times, December 15, 2010.Google Scholar
- Pauly, D. “Aquacalypse Now”. The New Republic, September 28, 2009.Google Scholar
- Slim, H. “By What Authority? The Legitimacy and Accountability of NGOs”. The International Council on Human Rights Policy International Meeting on ‘Global Trends and Human Rights – Before and after September 11’, Geneva, January 10–12, 2002.Google Scholar
- Sourcewatch. “Untitled.” 2007. Accessed May 2007http://www.sourcewatch.org.
- United Nations Economic and Social Council. Consultative Relationship Between the United Nations and Non-governmental Organizations. Resolution 1996/31 (1996).Google Scholar
- Brown, L.D., and Jagadananda. “Civil Society Legitimacy and Accountability: Issues and Challenges.” 2007. Hauser Center Working Paper (32). First Accessed January 27, 2008. http://www.civicusassembly.org/upload/File/Legitimacy%20%20Accountability%20Scoping%20Report%20-%20Final%20English%20..pdf.
- Simpson, D., K. Lefroy, and Y. Tsarenko. “Together and Apart: Exploring Structure of the Corporate–NPO Relationship”. Journal of Business Ethics 101 (2) (2011): 297–311.Google Scholar