Existential Anxiety, Responsibility and the Political Aspects of the Family

Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Philosophies and Theories in Education book series (COPT, volume 4)

Abstract

In this chapter, we focus explicitly on some of the existential dimensions of being a parent that we have been referring to throughout the preceding chapters. We draw on various philosophical resources – Zygmunt Bauman, Stanley Cavell, Hannah Arendt – which seem to us, firstly, to capture and thematise exactly the kind of concerns we have been at pains to spell out in this book and, secondly, to open up further the kind of conversation about childrearing and the parent-child relationship which we have argued is being blocked by the dominant languages. In particular these philosophical resources enable us to open up our understanding of childrearing and the parent–child relationship beyond an understanding of it in terms of what we call a scheme of one-to-one-interactions to an understanding in terms of what it means to introduce children into a common world. We discuss the implications of this for an understanding of the concept of parental responsibility and bring to mind a political dimension to childrearing which has been lost, or at least relegated to the background, because of current predominant ways of conceptualising it.

Keywords

Public Space Moral Agent Parental Responsibility Human World Public Orientation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Apple, R. (2006). Perfect motherhood. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arendt, H. (2006). Between past and future. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z. (1999). In search of politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the self. Gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bristow, J. (2009). Standing up to supernanny. Exeter: Societas Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  7. Cavell, S. (1979). The claim of reason. Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality, and tragedy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cavell, S. (1987). Disowning knowledge: In six plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cavell, S. (1988). In quest of the ordinary. Lines of skepticism and romanticism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cavell, S. (1990). Conditions handsome and unhandsome. The constitution of Emersonian perfectionism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cavell, S. (1996). Declining decline. In S. Mulhall (Ed.), The Cavell reader (pp. 321–352). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  12. Furedi, F. (2001). Paranoid parenting. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  13. Gillies, V. (2005). Meeting parents’ needs? Discourses of ‘support’ and ‘inclusion’ in family policy. Critical Social Policy, 25, 70–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gordon, M. (1999). Hannah Arendt on authority: Conservatism in education reconsidered. Educational Theory, 49, 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guldberg, H. (2009). Reclaiming childhood. Freedom and play in an age of fear. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Hogan, P., & Smith, R. (2003). The activity of philosophy and the practice of education. In N. Blake, P. Smeyers, R. Smith, & P. Standish (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of education (pp. 165–180). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  17. Lambeir, B., & Ramaekers, S. (2007). The terror of explicitness: Philosophical remarks on the idea of a parenting contract. Ethics and Education, 2(2), 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lasch, C. (1979). The culture of narcissism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  19. Levinson, N. (1997). Teaching in the midst of belatedness: The paradox of natality in Hannah Arendt’s educational thought. Educational Theory, 47, 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Long, C. P. (1998). A fissure in the distinction: Hannah Arendt, the family and the public/private dichotomy. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 24(4), 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pitkin, H. (1981). Justice: On relating private and public. Political Theory, 9, 327–352.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, R. (2010). Total parenting. Educational Theory, 60(3), 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Timimi, S. (2005). Naughty boys. Anti-social behaviour, ADHD and the role of culture. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Van der Pas, A. (2003). A serious case of neglect: The parental experience of child-rearing. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  25. Weille, K. L. H. (2011). Making sense of parenthood: On ambivalence and resourcefulness. Amsterdam: SWP.Google Scholar
  26. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences Laboratory for Education and SocietyKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Faculty of Policy and Society Institute of EducationUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations