Abstract
What is bioethics? Who is a bioethicist? Who is a health care ethics consultant or clinical ethics consultant? There are no straightforward answers to such questions. Indeed, the attempt to answer such questions usually engenders controversies. Bioethics is a puzzle. Bioethics is itself a controversy, a theater of dispute. Across the world, there are persons who call themselves bioethicists. But there is no agreement as to what ends they are doing what they do, as to what they should be doing, or even as to what they are doing. In hospitals across the world, there are persons who are paid as clinical ethics consultants (aka health care ethics consultants) and who are often held to be engaged in helping resolve normative questions about health care decisions. But there is no agreement as to what norms they should engage. This is because there is real dispute about the content and character of both morality and bioethics. As a result, there is a puzzle as to how properly to characterize the nature of the normative questions posed to bioethicists, as well as the answers bioethicists give. Bioethicists are asked, for example, about when a particular medical intervention is inappropriate (or futile), about who should make life-or-death decisions, and concerning what information should be provided in order for a patient adequately to consent to treatment. The question is what kinds of norms and which norms should frame such questions. In answering such questions, what norms and which norms should guide the answers? Are the norms at stake those established at law? Is the ethics about which health care ethics consultants (HCEC) give advice simply an account of relevant law and public policy, as well as of how law and public policy is customarily applied? Or are the norms moral norms? If so, norms of which morality? These puzzles about the nature of bioethics justify second thoughts about the entire endeavor of bioethics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. 2011. Core competencies for healthcare ethics consultation, 2nd ed. Glenview, IL: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.
Baker, R.B. 1993. The eighteenth-century philosophical background. In The codification of medical morality: Historical and philosophical studies of the formalization of Western medical morality in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries: Volume one: medical ethics and etiquette in the eighteenth century, eds. R.B. Baker, D. Porter, and R. Porter, 93–98. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Beauchamp, T., and J. Childress. 2009. The principles of biomedical ethics, 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Buckley, M. 1987. At the origins of modern atheism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Cherry, M.J. 2011. Bioethics as political ideology. In Bioethics in the plural: Ideology and social construction, 99–122. Dordrecht: Springer.
Clement of Alexandria, St. 1994. In Ante-Nicene fathers, vol. 2, eds. Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers.
Diogenes Laertius. 2000. Lives of eminent philosophers (trans: Hicks, R.D). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Edelstein, L. 1967. In Ancient medicine, eds. O. Temkin and C.L. Temkin. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. 1986. The foundations of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. 1996. The foundations of bioethics, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. 2002. The ordination of bioethicists as secular moral experts. Social Philosophy & Policy 19.2(Summer): 59–82.
Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. 2006. Critical reflections on theology’s handmaid: Why the role of philosophy in Orthodox Christianity is so different. Philosophy & Theology 18.1: 53–75.
Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. 2010a. On the secular state. Politeia 26.97: 59–79.
Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. 2010b. Political authority in the face of moral pluralism: Further reflections on the non-fundamentalist state. Politeia 26.97: 91–99.
Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. 2010c. Moral obligation after the death of God: Critical reflections on concerns from Immanuel Kant, G.W.F. Hegel, and Elizabeth Anscombe. Social Philosophy& Policy 27.2(Summer): 317–340.
Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. 2010d. Kant, Hegel, and Habermas: Reflections on “Glauben und Wissen”. The Review of Metaphysics 63(June): 871–903.
Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. 2011. Why clinical bioethics so rarely gives normative moral guidance: Some critical reflections. In Bioethics critically reconsidered: Having second thoughts, 151–174. Dordrecht: Springer.
Engelhardt, H.T., Jr., and Michael A. Rie. 1992. Selling virtue: Ethics as a profit maximizing strategy in health care delivery. Journal of Health & Social Policy 4.1: 27–35.
Fox, R.C., and J.P. Swazey. 2005. Examining American bioethics: Its problems and prospects. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14: 361–373.
Gregory, John. 1772 [1998]. Lectures on the duties and qualifications of a physician. Edinburgh: W. Strahem & T. Cadell. Reprinted in McCullough, L.B., ed. John Gregory’s writings on medical ethics and philosophy of medicine, 161–248. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Guthrie, W.K.C. 1977. The sophists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hinkley, A.E. 2011. Two rival understandings of autonomy: Paternalism and bioethical principlism. In Bioethics critically reconsidered: Having second thoughts, 85–95. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hunter, J.D. 1991. Culture wars: The struggle to define America. New York: Basic Books.
Iltis, A.S., and A. Carpenter. 2011. The “s” in bioethics: Past, present and future. In Bioethics critically reconsidered: Having second thoughts, 123–149. Dordrecht: Springer.
John Chrysostom, St. 1994a. Homilies on the Gospel of Saint Matthew. In Nicene and post-nicene fathers first series, vol. 10, ed. Philip Schaff. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers.
John Chrysostom, St. 1994b. Homilies on the acts of the apostles and the epistle to the romans. In Nicene and Post-nicene fathers first series, vol. 11, ed. Philip Schaff. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers.
Kuehn, M. 2001. Kant: A biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacIntyre, A. 1984. After virtue, 2nd ed. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Matusow, A.J. 1984. The unraveling of America: A history of liberalism in the 1960s. New York: Harper and Row.
McCullough, L.B. 2011. ‘Bioethics’ ideology of anti-paternalism. In Bioethics critically reconsidered: Having second thoughts, 71–84. Dordrecht: Springer.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research 1978. The Belmont Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; DHEW [OS] 78-0012.
Oken, D. 1961. What to tell cancer patients. A study of medical attitudes. Journal of the American Medical Association 175: 1120–1128.
Percival, T. 1803[1975]. Medical ethics: A code of institutes and precepts, adapted to the professional conduct of physicians and surgeons. London: J. Johnson & R. Bickerstaff. Reprinted by C.R. Burns, ed. Huntington, NY: Robert E. Krieger Publishing.
Romanides, J. 2002. The ancestral sin (trans: Gabriel, George S.). Ridgewood, NJ: Zephyr Publishing.
Sextus Empiricus. 1976. Outlines of pyrrhonism. In Sextus empiricus (trans: Bury, R.G). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sturleson, S. 1906. The elder eddas (trans: Thorpe, Benjamin). London: Norroena Society.
Symons, D. 1981. The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Trotter, G. 2011. Genesis of a totalizing ideology: Bioethics’ inner hippie. In Bioethics critically reconsidered: Having second thoughts, 49–69. Dordrecht: Springer.
Vattimo, G. 1991. The end of modernity (trans: Snyder, Jon R.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.
Vattimo, G. 2002. After Christianity (trans: D’Isanto, Luca). New York: Columbia University Press.
Versenyi, L. 1963. Socratic humanism. New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press.
Wilson, A.N. 1999. God’s funeral. New York: W.W. Norton.
Yesley, M.S. 2011. Beginning bioethics. In Bioethics critically reconsidered: Having second thoughts, 31–47. Dordrecht: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Engelhardt, H.T. (2012). A Skeptical Reassessment of Bioethics. In: Engelhardt, H. (eds) Bioethics Critically Reconsidered. Philosophy and Medicine(), vol 100. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2244-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2244-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2243-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2244-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)