Abstract
California hospitals have had to contemplate a complex web of interdependent decisions around SB 1953. The decisions have involved substantial capital commitments, extensive and not always well known opportunity costs, ongoing internal and external political maneuvering, consideration and reconsideration of decision fit with business strategy, establishing relationships with and evaluating the trustworthiness of architectural and engineering firms, and creativity in designing and implementing solutions that may not have been immediately apparent or appropriate. The decisions have not only been complex; they have had to be made again and again. As time has gone by, different players have joined the ranks of the decision makers and those charged with ensuring compliance with SB 1953 and the required regulations. Moreover, circumstances have regularly changed as amendments have been made to the law, as more information has become available, and as healthcare economics have continued to change. Traditional rational decision-making approaches have been found wanting, as “the problem” and possible solutions have been defined differently, depending on who was looking at them and when. This chapter introduces hazard mitigation investment decision making from the perspective of hospitals affected by SB 1953. Later chapters address the specific factors influencing hospital decision making.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dess GG, Beard DW (1984) Dimensions of organizational task environments. Adm Sci Q 29:52–73
DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in the organizational field. Am Social Rev 48:147–160
Hambrick D, Mason P (1984) Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Manage Rev 9:193–206
Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer, New York
March JG, Olsen JP (1973) Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Universitetsforlaget, Bergen
March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. Wiley, New York
Meade C, Kulick J (2007) SB 1953 and the challenge of hospital seismic safety in California. California HealthCare Foundation, Oakland
Petak WJ, Alesch DJ (2004) Organizational decision making with respect to extreme events: healthcare organizations respond to California’s SB 1953. In research progress and accomplishments: 2003–2004 (MCEER-04-SP01). University of Buffalo, State University of New York, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, May 2004
Porter M (1980) Competitive strategy. Free Press, New York
Rothwell R (1992) Industrial innovation and government environmental regulation: some lessons from the past. Technovation 12(7):447–458
Skinner BF (1974) About behaviorism. Vintage, New York
Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Weick KE (2001) Making sense of the organization. Blackwell Publishing, Alden
Williamson OE (1975) Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press, New York
Woo G (2002) Natural catastrophe probable maximum loss. Br Actuar J 8:943–959, Part V
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alesch, D.J., Arendt, L.A., Petak, W.J. (2012). Organizational Responses: Introduction to Hazard Mitigation Investment Decision Making in Hospitals. In: Natural Hazard Mitigation Policy. Environmental Hazards. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2235-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2235-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2234-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2235-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)