Advertisement

Mindsets, Policy Design, Congruence, and Related Obstacles to Policy Implementation

  • Daniel J. AleschEmail author
  • Lucy A. Arendt
  • William J. Petak
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Hazards book series (ENHA)

Abstract

The mindset of the architects of a hazard mitigation policy largely dictates how they frame the problem and the subsequent policy. That, in turn, determines the approach taken to designing the subsequent legislation and the programs created by administrators and intended to implement the policy. If the problem is framed narrowly without sufficient regard to targeted organizations’ prerequisites for compliance, and without careful consideration of other systemic interfaces, diminishes the likelihood that policy implementation will result in the desired outcomes.

Keywords

Causal Model Acute Care Hospital Damage Earthquake Hazard Mitigation Hospital Facility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ackoff R (1974) Redesigning the future. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesch D, Petak W (1986) The politics and economics of earthquake hazard mitigation: unreinforced masonry buildings in Southern California. Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow K (1951) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Crowley CF, Nalder E (2009) Dead by mistake: within health care hides massive, avoidable death. Hearst newspapers, August 10. http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/deadbymistake/6555095.html
  5. Lasswell HD (1976) Power and personality. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. March JG, Olsen JP (1976) Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Unversitetsforlaget, BergenGoogle Scholar
  7. Mazmanian DA, Sabatier PA (1989) Implementation and public policy: with a new postscript. University Press of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  8. Petak WJ, Atkisson AA (1982) Natural hazard risk assessment and public policy: anticipating the unexpected. Springer, New York, Lanham, MDGoogle Scholar
  9. Pressman JL, Wildavsky A (1973) Implementation. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  10. Sabatier P, Mazmanian D (1979) The conditions of effective implementation; a guide to accomplishing policy objectives. Policy Anal 5:481–504Google Scholar
  11. State Seismic Safety Commission (2011). Official California Seismic Safety Commission website home page. http://www.seismic.ca.gov/
  12. Steinbrugge KE, Schader BH, Weers C (1971) San Fernando earthquake, February 9,1971. Pacific Fire Rating Bureau, San Francisco, August 10Google Scholar
  13. Thurow LC (1980) The zero-sum society: distribution and the possibilities for economic change. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel J. Alesch
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lucy A. Arendt
    • 1
  • William J. Petak
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Wisconsin-Green BayGreen BayUSA
  2. 2.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations