Advertisement

Organizational Differences in Hazard Mitigation Investment Decision Making: Outside the Organization

  • Daniel J. AleschEmail author
  • Lucy A. Arendt
  • William J. Petak
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Hazards book series (ENHA)

Abstract

In this chapter, we present two additional categories of factors that we believe influence whether, why, and how individual hospital organizations make extreme hazard mitigation investment decisions. Both categories reflect the impact of the external environment on the organization’s internal workings and decision-making process. The categories are: (1) institutional predictors, including both external and internal pressures, and (2) the regulatory relationship. As with the last chapter, we describe each category from a theoretical perspective, drawing on relevant academic literature. For example, the institutional predictors are based on DiMaggio and Powell’s (1983)description of normative, mimetic, and coercive isomorphic forces. Then, we augment our description of each category with examples drawn from our qualitative research. The extent to which any given hospital relies on these factors to make hazard mitigation decisions is variable and contextual.

Keywords

Acute Care Hospital Hazard Mitigation Hospital Administrator Base Isolation Hospital Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Blau PM, Scott WR (1962) Formal organizations: a comparative approach. Chandler Publishing, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  2. Brittain JW, Freeman JH (1980) Organizational proliferation and density dependent selection. In: Kimberly JR, Miles RH, Associates (eds), The organizational life cycle, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 291–338Google Scholar
  3. Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The management of innovation. Tavistock, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. California Healthcare Foundation (2006) Project management, design, and construction of buildings under OSHPD jurisdiction. Oakland, CAGoogle Scholar
  5. Coglianese C, Nash J (2002) Policy options for improving environmental management in the private sector. Environment 44:11–23Google Scholar
  6. Conroy MM, Berke PR (2004) What makes a good sustainable development plan? An analysis of factors that influence principles of sustainable development. Environ Plann A 36:1381–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Covin JG, Slevin DP (1989) Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strat Manag J 10:75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  9. Dess GG, Beard DW (1984) Dimensions of organizational task environments. Adm Sci Q 29:52–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in the organizational field. Am Sociol Rev 48:147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fredrickson JW (1986) The strategic decision process and organizational structure. Acad Manage Rev 11:280–297Google Scholar
  12. Gersick CJG (1994) Pacing strategic change: the case of a new venture. Acad Manage J 37:9–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hage J (1965) An axiomatic theory of organizations. Adm Sci Q 10:289–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hess DB, Arendt LA (2006) Critical care in crisis: decision making in New Orleans’ hospitals. In: Natural Hazards Center (ed), Learning from catastrophe: quick response research in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, 177–213. Boulder, COCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kash DE, Rycroft R (2002) Emerging patterns of complex technological innovation. Technol Forecast Soc Change 69(6):581–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meade C, Kulick J (2007) SB 1953 and the challenge of hospital seismic safety in California. California HealthCare Foundation, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  17. Mills-Peninsula Health Services (2010) Earthquake safety. http://www.mills-peninsulanews.org/technology/
  18. Mills-Peninsula Newsroom (2011) http://www.mills-peninsulanews.org/technology/
  19. Pfeffer J, Salancik G (1978) The external control of organizations. Pittman, BostonGoogle Scholar
  20. Pfeffer J (1981) Power in organizations. Pittman, MarshfieldGoogle Scholar
  21. Pugh DS, Hickson DJ, Hinings CR, Turner C (1968) Dimensions of organizational structure. Adm Sci Q 13:65–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ruble T, Thomas K (1976) Support for a two-dimensional model of conflict behavior. Organ Behav Hum Perform 16:143–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharfman MP, Meo M, Ellington RT (2000) Regulation, business, and sustainable development: the antecedents of environmentally conscious technological innovation. Am Behav Sci 44:277–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Staw BM, Sandelands LE, Dutton JE (1981) Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: a multilevel analysis. Adm Sci Q 26:501–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wagner JA III (1994) Participation’s effects on performance and satisfaction: a reconsideration of research evidence. Acad Manage Rev 19:312–330Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel J. Alesch
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lucy A. Arendt
    • 1
  • William J. Petak
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Wisconsin-Green BayGreen BayUSA
  2. 2.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations