Socio Economic and Policy Issues in Abiotic Stress Management

Chapter

Abstract

Abiotic stress and biotic stress are the two broad factors that constrain the growth in agricultural productivity needed for economic development of developing countries such as India. The importance of abiotic stress is likely to increase with wide spread land degradation because of various physical, biological and chemical processes and the projected impacts of climate change will further accentuate the ill effects of abiotic stress. A number of demographic and economic factors have been responsible for degradation of natural resources that predisposes crop plants to abiotic stress. Abiotic stress is different from biotic stress in that the two principal factors, soil and climate, involved are difficult to be manipulated and in that the incidence is more covariate. These two dimensions make abiotic stress more difficult to be managed. While the governments are now better placed in terms of having more resources and better technical and scientific capabilities to deal with impacts of abiotic stress, the households and regions within countries continue to be more vulnerable. What is required is a strategy that coordinates technical and institutional measures to be taken up by different stake holders at varying scales.

Keywords

Abiotic Stress Water Scarcity Land Degradation Degraded Land Rural Poor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aggarwal PK et al (2004) Adapting food systems of the Indo-Gangetic plains to global environmental change: key information needs to improve policy formulation. Environ Sci Policy 7(6):487–498, December 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altieri MA (2002) Agroecology: the science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments. Agric Ecosyst Environ 93(1–3):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson JR (2003) Risk in rural development: challenges for managers and policy makers. Agric Syst 75:161–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson JR, Hazell PBR (1994) Risk considerations in the transfer of agricultural technology. In: Anderson JR (ed) Agricultural technology policy issues for the international community: CAB International in association with the World BankCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anonymous (2008) Harmonization of wastelands/degraded land datasets of India. National Rainfed Area Authority (NRAA), Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi, 5 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellon MR et al (2005) Targeting agricultural research to benefit poor farmers: relating poverty mapping to maize environments in Mexico. Food Policy 30(5–6):476–492, October–December 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennet EM, Carpenter SR, Peterson GD, Cumming GS, Zurek M, Pingali P (2003) Why global scenarios need ecology. Front Ecol Environ 1(6):322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Jager A (2005) Participatory technology, policy and institutional development to address soil fertility degradation in Africa. Land Use Policy 22(1):57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Falloon P, Betts R (2009) Climate impacts on European agriculture and water management in the context of adaptation and mitigation – the importance of an integrated approach. Sci Total Environ 408:5667–5687PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gleick PH (1993) Water and conflict: Fresh water resources and international security. International Security 18(1):79–112Google Scholar
  11. Jarre A et al (2006) Developing a basis for detecting and predicting long-term ecosystem changes. Large Mar Ecosyst 14:239–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kesavan PC, Swaminathan MS (2006) Managing extreme natural disasters in coastal areas. Philos Trans R Soc A 364:2191–2216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kijne JW (2006) Abiotic stress and water scarcity: identifying and resolving conflicts from plant level to global level. Field Crop Res 97(1):3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lakshmi A, Rajagopalan R (2000) Socio-economic implications of coastal zone degradation and their mitigation: a case study from coastal villages in India. Ocean Coast Manag 43(8–9):749–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lambin E et al (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Change 11(4):261–269, December 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu C, Golding D, Gong G (2008) Farmers’ coping response to the low flows in the lower Yellow River: a case study of temporal dimensions of vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 18(4):543–553, October 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mehta L (2006) Whose scarcity? Whose property? The case of water in western India. Land Use Policy 24(4):654–663, October 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Motsara MR (2002) Available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium status of Indian soils as depicted by soil fertilizer maps. Fertil News 47(8):15–21Google Scholar
  20. Namara RE, Hanjra MA, Castilo GE, Ravnborg HM, Smith L, Van Koppen B (2010) Agricultural water management and poverty linkages. Agric Water Manag 97:520–527Google Scholar
  21. Nellemann C et al (2009) The environmental food crisis-the environments’ role in averting future food crisis. A UNEP rapid response assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-ArendalGoogle Scholar
  22. Paavola J (2008) Livelihoods, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change in Morogoro, Tanzania. Environ Sci Policy 11(7):642–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reece JD (2007) Does genomics empower resource-poor farmers? Some critical questions and experiences. Agric Syst 94(2):553–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schultz B (2001) Irrigation, drainage and flood protection in a rapidly changing world. Irrigation and Drainage 50(4):261–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sharma HC, Sharma KK, Seetharama N, Orti R (2001) Genetic transformation of crop plants: risks and opportunities for the rural poor. Curr Sci 80(12):1495–1508Google Scholar
  26. Simelton E et al (2009) Typologies of crop-drought vulnerability: an empirical analysis of the socio-economic factors that influence the sensitivity and resilience to drought of three major food crops in China (1961–2001). Environ Sci Policy 12(4):438–452, June 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thomas RJ (2008) Opportunities to reduce the vulnerability of dryland farmers in Central and West Asia and North Africa to climate change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 126:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Warren A et al (2001) Soil erosion in the West African Sahel: a review and an application of a “local political ecology” approach in South West Niger. Glob Environ Change 11(1):79–95, April 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wurtenberger L, Koelner T, Binder CR (2006) Virtual land use and agricultural trade. Ecol Econ 57:679–697Google Scholar
  30. Ye L, Van Ranst E (2009) Production scenarios and the effect of soil degradation on long-term food security in China. Glob Environ Change 19(4):464–481, October 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Central Research Institute for Dryland AgricultureHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations