Advertisement

The Economics of Continuous Cover Forestry

  • Thomas Knoke
Chapter
Part of the Managing Forest Ecosystems book series (MAFE, volume 23)

Abstract

This chapter attempts to provide improved understanding of the economics of continuous cover forestry (CCF), which constitutes an interesting area of research and is of considerable practical relevance. We first present a review of recent economic studies, which shows that the economically optimal silvicultural system often converges (sooner or later) towards CCF, even if the starting situation is even-aged. If appropriate regeneration may be produced by the adult trees and sufficient recruitment fills up the smallest diameter class, it is often optimal never to clear-cut a forest stand. Subsequently, economic pros and cons of CCF are discussed. Among the economic pros of CCF we find: (1) Regular and frequent net revenues even at the stand-level; (2) possibility to harvest every tree according to its individual financial maturity; and, (3) enhanced stand resistance combined with increased management flexibility. However, the economies of scale may play against CCF, although actual studies do not provide evidence for this assumption. The economies of scale may also be seen as a reason for the often prevailing skepticism of practitioners against CCF. Future research should thus clarify the importance of the economies of scale: Which infrastructure (e.g. the road density) and personnel would be required by various silvicultural systems? How could the results of the up-to-date economic studies be utilized in practice? Moreover, future research must also address the risks and uncertainties as well as diversification effects, such as diversified tree species and harvesting strategies, which so far have rarely been considered.

Keywords

Forest Management Forest Owner European Beech Timber Price Silvicultural System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Laura Carlson for the language editing of the manuscript and to the German Research Foundation (DFG) for generously funding this research (KN 586/7-1).

References

  1. Adams DM, Ek AR (1974) Optimizing the management of uneven-aged forest stands. Can J For Res 4:274–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amacher GS, Ollikainen M, Koskela EA (2009) Economics of forest resources. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Ammon W (1951) Das Plenterprinzip in der Waldwirtschaft, 3rd edn. Paul Haupt, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreassen K, Øyen BH (2002) Economic consequences of three silvicultural methods in uneven-aged mature coastal spruce forests of central Norway. Forestry 75:483–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baader G (1945) Forsteinrichtung als nachhaltige Betriebsführung und Betriebsplanung. Sauerländer’s, Frankfurt a.MGoogle Scholar
  6. Beinhofer B (2010a) Producing softwood of different quality-does this provide risk compensation? Eur J For Res 129:921–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beinhofer B (2010b) Comparing the financial performance of traditionally managed beech and oak stands with roomy established and pruned stands. Eur J For Res 129:175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benitez PC, McCallum I, Obersteiner M, Yamagata Y (2007) Global potential for carbon sequestration: geographical distribution, country risk and policy implications. Ecol Econ 60:572–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bettinger P, Boston K, Sirey JP, Grebner D (2009) Forest management and planning. Amsterdam et al.: Academic Press (imprint of Elsevier)Google Scholar
  10. Biolley HE (1922) Die Forsteinrichtung auf der Grundlage der Erfahrung und insbesondere das Kontrollverfahren. Deutsch von Oberförster Eberbach. Gebr. Attinger, Paris/Neuchatel/ KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  11. Brazee R, Mendelsohn R (1988) Timber harvesting with fluctuating prices. For Sci 34:359–372Google Scholar
  12. Buongiorno J, Peyron JL, Houllier F, Bruciamacchie M (1995) Growth and management of mixed species, uneven-aged forests in the French Jura: Implications for economic returns and tree diversity. For Sci 41:397–429Google Scholar
  13. Chang SJ (1981) Determination of the optimal growing stock and cutting cycle for an uneven-aged stand. For Sci 27:739–744Google Scholar
  14. Chang SJ, Gadow KV (2010) Application of the generalized Faustmann model to uneven-aged forest management. J For Econ 16:313–325Google Scholar
  15. Cotta, H. (1828) Anweisung zum Waldbau. Carl Heinrich Edmund von BergGoogle Scholar
  16. Cubbage F, Mac Donagh P, Sawinski Junior J, Rubilar R, Donoso P, Ferreira A, Hoe-flich V, Morales Olmos V, Ferreira G, Balmelli G, Siry J, Noemi Baez M, Alvarez J (2007) Timber investment returns for selected plantations and native forests in South America and the Southern United States. New Forests 33:237–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duerr WA, Bond WE (1952) Optimum stocking in a selection forest. J For 50:12–16Google Scholar
  18. Endres M (1919) Lehrbuch der Waldwertrechnung und Forststatik, 3rd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  19. Faustmann M (1849) Berechnung des Werthes, welchen Waldboden, sowie noch nicht haubare Holzbestände für die Waldwirthschaft besitzen. Allgemeine Forst und Jagd Zeitung 15:441–455Google Scholar
  20. Gayer K (1886) Der gemischte Wald: seine Begründung und Pflege, insbesondere durch Horst- und Gruppenwirtschaft. Paul Parey, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  21. Gordon HS (1953) An economic approach to the optimum utilization of fishery resources. J Fisheries Res Board Canada 10(7):442–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haight R (1985) A comparison of dynamic and static economic models of uneven-aged stand management. For Sci 31:957–974Google Scholar
  23. Haight R (1987) Evaluating the efficiency of even-aged and uneven-aged stand management. For Sci 33:116–134Google Scholar
  24. Haight RG, Monserud RA (1990) Optimizing any-aged management of mixed-Species mtands: II. Effects of decision criteria. For Sci 36:125–144Google Scholar
  25. Hanewinkel M (1998) Plenterwald und Plenterwaldüberführung – Modellstudien zu planungstechnischen, waldbaulichen und ökonomischen Aspekten am Fallbeispiel des Wuchsgebietes Schwarzwald. Freiburg: Schriften aus dem Institut für Forstökonomie 9Google Scholar
  26. Hanewinkel M (2001a) Economic aspects of the transformation from even-aged pure stands of Norway spruce to uneven-aged mixed stands of Norway spruce and beech. For Ecol Manag 151:181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanewinkel M (2001b) Financial results of selection forest enterprises with high propor-tions of valuable timber – results of an empirical study and their application. Schweizer Zeitschrift für Forstwesen 152:343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanewinkel M (2002) Comparative economic investigations of even-aged and uneven-aged silvicultural systems: a critical analysis of different methods. Forestry 75:473–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hartig GL (1800) Anweisung zur Holzzucht für Förster, 3rd edn. Akademische Buchhandlung, MarburgGoogle Scholar
  30. Härtl F, Hahn A, Knoke T (2010) Integrating neighbourhood effects in the calculation of optimal final tree diameters. J For Econ 16:179–193Google Scholar
  31. Hildebrandt P, Kirchlechner P, Hahn A, Knoke T, Mujica R (2010) Mixed species plantations in Southern Chile and the risk of timber price fluctuation. Eur J For Res 129:935–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hundeshagen JC (1826) Die Forstabschätzung auf neuen wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen. H. Laupp, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  33. Hyytiäinen K, Haight RG (2010) Evaluation of forest management systems under risk of wildfire. Eur J For Res 129:909–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Judeich F (1871) Die Forsteinrichtung. Schönfeld’s Verlagsbuchhandlung, DresdenGoogle Scholar
  35. Jübner D (2006) Ökonomische Modellanalyse zur Bewirtschaftung eines Plenterwaldes am Beispiel einer Versuchsfläche im Emmental, Schweiz. Diploma Thesis Fakultät Forst-, Geo- und Hydrowissenschaften, Technische Universität DresdenGoogle Scholar
  36. Kant S (1999) Sustainable management of uneven-aged private forests: a case study from Ontario, Canada. Ecol Econ 30:131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Knoke T (1997) Ökonomische Aspekte der Holzproduktion in ungleichaltrigen Wäldern: einführende Untersuchungen zur Forstbetriebsplanung im Kreuzberger Gemeindewald. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 116:178–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Knoke T (1998) Analyse und Optimierung der Holzproduktion in einem Plenterwald – zur Forstbetriebsplanung in ungleichaltrigen Wäldern. Forstliche Forschungsberichte München 170Google Scholar
  39. Knoke T (2009) Zur finanziellen Attraktivität von Dauerwaldwirtschaft und Überführung: eine Literaturanalyse. Schweiz Z Forstwes 160:152–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Knoke T, Peter R (2002) Zum optimalen Zieldurchmesser bei fluktuierendem Holzpreis – eine Studie am Beispiel von Kiefern-Überhältern (Pinus sylvestris L.). Allgemeine Forst- u Jagdzeitung 173:21–28Google Scholar
  41. Knoke T, Plusczyk N (2001) On economic consequences of transformation of a spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) dominated stand from regular into irregular age structure. For Ecol Manag 151:163–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Knoke T, Seifert T (2008) Integrating selected ecological effects of mixed European beech-Norway spruce stands in bioeconomic modelling. Ecol Model 210:487–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Knoke T, Wurm J (2006) Mixed forests and a flexible harvest strategy: a problem for conventional risk analysis? Eur J For Res 125:303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Knoke T, Moog M, Plusczyk N (2001) On the effect of volatile stumpage prices on the economic attractiveness of a silvicultural transformation strategy. Forest Policy Econ 2:229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Knoke T, Stimm B, Ammer C, Moog M (2005) Mixed forests reconsidered: a forest economics contribution to the discussion on natural diversity. For Ecol Manag 213:102–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lenk E, Kenk G (2007) Sortenproduktion und Risiken Schwarzwälder Plenterwälder. Allgemeine Forstzeitung/Der Wald 62:136–139Google Scholar
  47. von Lüpke B, Spellmann H (1999) Aspects of stability, growth and natural regeneration in mixed Norway spruce-European beech stands as a basis of silvicultural decisions. In: Olsthoorn AFM et al (eds) Management of mixed-species forest: silviculture and economics. IBN-DLO Scientific Contributions, Wageningen, pp 245–267Google Scholar
  48. Mayer H (1968) Langfristige waldbauliche Betriebsrationalisierung. Allgemeine Forstzeitung 23:687–689, 711–713, 725–728, 742–743, 754–757, 770–771Google Scholar
  49. Mitscherlich G (1952) Der Tannen-Fichten-Buchen-Plenterwald. Schriftenreihe der Badischen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt Freiburg im Breisgau, Heft 8Google Scholar
  50. Mohr C, Schori C (1999) Femelschlag oder Plenterung – Ein Vergleich aus betriebswirtschaftlicher Sicht. Schweizer Zeitschrift für Forstwesen 150:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Möller A (1922) Der Dauerwaldgedanke: Sein Sinn und seine Bedeutung. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  52. Pausch R (2005) Ein System-Ansatz zur Darstellung des Zusammenhangs zwischen Wald-struktur, Arbeitsvolumen und Kosten in naturnahen Wäldern Bayerns. Forstliche Forschungsberichte München, Heft 199Google Scholar
  53. Pearce D, Putz FE, Vanclay JK (2003) Sustainable forestry in the tropics: panacea or folly? For Ecol Manag 172:229–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pommerening A, Murphy ST (2004) A review of the history, definitions and methods of continuous cover forestry with special attention to afforestation and restocking. Forestry 77:27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pretzsch H, Kahn M (1996) Wuchsmodelle für die Unterstützung der Wirtschaftsplanung im Forstbetrieb. Allgem. Forstz./Der Wald 51: SonderdruckGoogle Scholar
  56. Price C, Price M (2008) Cost-benefit analysis of continuous cover forestry. Scand Forest Econ 42:36–64Google Scholar
  57. Price M, Price C (2006) Creaming the best, or creatively transforming? Might felling the biggest trees first be a win-win strategy? For Ecol Manag 224:297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho S (2009) Growth and yield models for uneven-sized forest stands in Finland. For Ecol Manag 258:207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho S (2010) Optimizing the structure and management of uneven-sized stands of Finland. Forestry 83:129–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ralston R, Buongiorno J, Fried JS (2004) Potential yield, return, and tree diversity of managed, uneven-aged Douglas-Fir stands. Silva Fennica 38:55–70Google Scholar
  61. Richter A (1963) Einführung in die Forsteinrichtung. Neumann, RadebeulGoogle Scholar
  62. Roessiger J., Griess V.C., Knoke T. (published online). May risk aversion lead to near-natural forestry? A simulation study. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, doi: 10.1093/foresj/CPR017 (http://forestry.oxfordjournals.org/content/early2011/06/15/forestry.cpr017.full)
  63. Sánchez Orois S, Chang JS, Gadow KV (2004) Optimal residual growing stock and cutting cycle in mixed uneven-aged maritime pine stands in Northwestern Spain. Forest Policy Econ 6:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schulte JB, Buongiorno J (1998) Effects of uneven-aged silviculture on the stand structure, species composition, and economic returns of loblolly pine stands. For Ecol Manag 111:83–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schulz G (1993) Betriebswirtschaftliche Aspekte des Plenterwaldes. Allgemeine Forstzeitung 48:731–733Google Scholar
  66. Schütz J-P (1985) La production de bois de qualite dans la foret jardinee. Ann Gembloux 91: 147–161Google Scholar
  67. Siegmund E (1973) Aufwand und Ertrag bei waldbaulichen Betriebsformen. Diss. Forstw. Fakultät LMU MünchenGoogle Scholar
  68. Siiskonen H (2007) The conflict between traditional and scientific forest management in 20th century Finland. For Ecol Manag 249:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Siry JP, Cubbage FW (2003) Global forests – area, management, and ownership. In: Sills EO, Abt KL (eds) Forests in a market economy. Kluwer, Dordrecht. Forestry Sci 72:9–21Google Scholar
  70. Staupendahl K (2011) Modellierung der Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit von Waldbeständen mithilfe der neu parametrisierten Weibull-Funktion. Forstarchiv 82:10–19Google Scholar
  71. Tahvonen O, Pukkala T, Laiho O, Lähde E, Niinimäki S (2010) Optimal management of uneven-aged Norway spruce stands. For Ecol Manag 260:106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tarp P, Helles F, Holten-Andersen P, Larsen JB, Strange N (2000) Modelling near-natural regimes for beech – an economic sensitivity analysis. For Ecol Manag 130:187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wagner C (1928) Lehrbuch der theoretischen Forsteinrichtung. Paul Parey, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  74. Wikström P (2000) A solution method for uneven-aged management applied to Norway spruce. For Sci 46:452–463Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Forest ManagementTechnische Universität MünchenFreisingGermany

Personalised recommendations