Skip to main content

A Systematic Review of Intervention Efforts to Reduce Indoor Tanning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter reviews the literature examining interventions to reduce indoor tanning (IT). The first objective was to highlight programs that show promise for large scale dissemination. The second objective was to promote criteria and standards for future intervention research efforts. The scope of interest for this review includes universal (for everyone in the population), selective (for those in the population who are at a greater risk), and indicated (for those who already are experiencing conditions that identify them as at risk) programs. The evaluation of the interventions resulted in three levels of evidence: (1) most promising, (2) emerging, and (3) mixed. For an intervention to be considered “most promising”, it was required that ten criteria be met through examination of research findings in published reports consistent with Flay and colleagues (Prev Sci 6(3):151–175, 2005). Interventions that were classified as “emerging” met most of the criteria. Finally, interventions classified as “mixed” did not reach threshold on more than two criteria that were deemed critical. The results revealed that there was very limited research on IT interventions that meet all the evaluation criteria. Only one intervention approach met all of the criteria (Appearance Booklet) (Hillhouse and Turrisi, Behav Med 25(4):395–409, 2002; Hillhouse et al., Cancer 113(11):3257–3266, 2008). Although the number of published papers in the IT area has increased dramatically over the past decade, these efforts have yet to translate into rigorously conducted intervention trials. The review points to important issues that need to be addressed in future research on the prevention of IT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

IT:

Indoor tanning

MI:

Motivational interviewing

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

US:

United States

UV:

Ultraviolet

References

  1. Geller AC, Colditz G, Oliveria S et al (2002) Use of sunscreen, sunburning rates, and tanning bed use among more than 10 000 US children and adolescents. Pediatrics 109(6):1009–1014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Autier P (2004) Perspectives in melanoma prevention: the case of sunbeds. Eur J Cancer 40(16):2367–2376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Demko CA, Borawski EA, Debanne SM et al (2003) Use of indoor tanning facilities by white adolescents in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157(9):854–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schneider S, Kramer H (2010) Who uses sunbeds? A systematic literature review of risk groups in developed countries. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 24(6):639–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Diffey BL, Langtry JA (2005) Skin cancer incidence and the ageing population. Br J Dermatol 153(3):679–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Titus-Ernstoff L, Perry AE, Spencer SK et al (2006) Multiple primary melanoma: two-year results from a population-based study. Arch Dermatol 142(4):433–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al (2008) Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 58(2):71–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. American Cancer Society (2009) Cancer facts & figures 2008. American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  9. Flay BR, Biglan A, Boruch RF et al (2005) Standards of evidence: criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prev Sci 6(3):151–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hillhouse JJ, Turrisi R (2002) Examination of the efficacy of an appearance-focused intervention to reduce UV exposure. J Behav Med 25(4):395–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hillhouse J, Turrisi R, Stapleton J et al (2008) A randomized controlled trial of an appearance-focused intervention to prevent skin cancer. Cancer 113(11):3257–3266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stapleton J, Turrisi R, Hillhouse J et al (2010) A comparison of the efficacy of an appearance-focused skin cancer intervention within indoor tanner subgroups identified by latent profile analysis. J Behav Med 33(3):181–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, Lane DJ et al (2005) Using UV photography to reduce use of tanning booths: a test of cognitive mediation. Health Psychol 24(4):358–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Turrisi R, Mastroleo NR, Stapleton J et al (2008) A comparison of 2 brief intervention approaches to reduce indoor tanning behavior in young women who indoor tan very frequently. Arch Dermatol 144(11):1521–1524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Greene K, Brinn LS (2003) Messages influencing college women’s tanning bed use: statistical versus narrative evidence format and a self-assessment to increase perceived susceptibility. J Health Commun 8(5):443–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Routledge C, Arndt J, Goldenberg JL (2004) A time to tan: proximal and distal effects of mortality salience on sun exposure intentions. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 30(10):1347–1358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cox CR, Cooper DP, Vess M et al (2009) Bronze is beautiful but pale can be pretty: the effects of appearance standards and mortality salience on sun-tanning outcomes. Health Psychol 28(6):746–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dodd LJ, Forshaw MJ (2010) Assessing the efficacy of appearance-focused interventions to prevent skin cancer: a systemic review of the literature. Health Psychol Rev 4(2):93–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hillhouse J, Turrisi R, Shields AL (2007) Patterns of indoor tanning use: implications for clinical interventions. Arch Dermatol 143(12):1530–1535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute for their support of the research of Drs. Turrisi, Hillhouse, Mallett, Stapleton, and Robinson, and also Kelly Guttman for her comments on earlier versions of the chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rob Turrisi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Turrisi, R., Hillhouse, J., Mallett, K., Stapleton, J., Robinson, J. (2012). A Systematic Review of Intervention Efforts to Reduce Indoor Tanning. In: Heckman, C., Manne, S. (eds) Shedding Light on Indoor Tanning. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2048-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics