Robustness of Shrinkage-Compensating Repair Concretes

  • Pierre-Vincent Certain
  • Benoît Bissonnette
  • Josée Bastien
  • Jacques Marchand
  • Marc Jolin
Conference paper

Abstract

Drying shrinkage is one of the least desirable properties of repair concrete, because in restrained conditions, it may lead to shrinkage cracking and thus adversely affect its durability. Shrinkage compensating concretes (ShCCs) made with expansive mineral admixture represent an attractive alternative to prevent shrinkage cracking. This paper outlines a project devoted to the study of ShCC repair material robustness as a function of selected parameters. Two types of expansive agents were used, a calcium sulfoaluminate-based admixture (Type K) and a calcium oxide-based (Type G) one. The assessment of robustness addressed the influence of both the mixture design parameters (cement composition, type and dosage of expansive agent, w/cm ratio) and the curing conditions (moist curing conditions, temperature) upon the ShCC expansive behavior, the bond between ShCC repairs and concrete substrates, and ShCC frost durability. Overall, the results yielded in this study demonstrate interesting potential of ShCCs as crack-resistant and durable repair materials.

Keywords

Tensile Splitting Strength Mixture Design Repair Material Stress Balance Concrete Substrate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project has been financially supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the Québec FQRNT Research Fund and the industrial partners of the Industrial Chair on Durable Repair and Optimized Maintenance of Concrete Infrastructures at Laval University (BASF Building Systems, City of Montreal, City of Québec, Euclid, Holcim, Hydro-Québec, Kerneos, King Packaged Materials, Lafarge, Ministry of Transportation of Québec, W.R. Grace & Co.).

References

  1. McDonald JE, Campbell RL (1985) The condition of corps of engineers civil works concrete structures, technical report REMR-CS-2, US army corps of engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, VicksburgGoogle Scholar
  2. Emmons PH (1994) Concrete repair and maintenance illustrated: problem analysis, repair strategy, techniques. R.S. Means Company, KingstonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bissonnette B, Perez F, Blais S, Gagné R (2008) Évaluation des bétons à retrait compensé pour les travaux de réparation. Can J Civ Eng 35(7):716–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre-Vincent Certain
    • 1
  • Benoît Bissonnette
    • 2
  • Josée Bastien
    • 2
  • Jacques Marchand
    • 2
  • Marc Jolin
    • 2
  1. 1.Département de génie civil, LCMÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Département de génie civil, CRIBUniversité LavalQuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations