Abstract
In this chapter we consider teachers’ ‘documentation work’: selecting resources, combining them, using them and revising, amongst others. We present a theoretical approach for the study of this work, conceptualising the articulation between documentation work and professional growth. This ‘documentational’ approach of didactics introduces a distinction between resources and documents: the teacher, drawing on resources, develops a document, in a process identified as ‘documentational genesis’. Studying ‘documentational geneses’ requires a specific methodology: the reflective investigation of teachers’ documentation work. We study data collected with this methodology, in particular in the case of a teacher introducing the notion of function. Teachers’ documentation work is central to their professional activity; accordingly teachers develop documentation systems, whose structure is strongly related to the structure of the professional activity. The documentation system conversely influences the professional activity, which evolves along ‘professional geneses’. Our study especially focuses on digital resources and on the repercussions of their use on teachers’ professional geneses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
IREM, Institute for Research on Mathematics Teaching.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
In France every teacher can propose in-service training, on a given subject, usually for 1 or 2 days. The regional inspectors select some of the propositions to constitute the yearly ‘training offer’.
- 5.
http://www.index-education.com/fr/telecharger-profnote.php, ‘Pronote’ means ‘professional marks’.
References
Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 205–224.
Assude, T. (2007). ‘Teachers’ practices and degree of ICT integration’. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1339–1348). Larnaca, Cyprus: CERME 5. Retrieved May 2011, from http://ermeweb.free.fr/CERME5b/
Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142.
Gueudet, G., Soury-Lavergne, S., & Trouche, L. (2009). Soutenir l'intégration des TICE: quels assistants méthodologiques pour le développement de la documentation collective des professeurs? Exemples du SFoDEM et du dispositif Pairform@nce. In C. Ouvrier-Buffet & M.-J. Perrin-Glorian (Eds.), Approches plurielles en didactique des mathématiques (pp. 161–173). Paris: Laboratoire de didactique André Revuz, Université Paris Diderot.
Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71, 199–218.
Guin, D., Ruthven, K., & Trouche, L. (Eds.). (2005). The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: Turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument. New York: Springer.
Hoyles, C., & Lagrange, J.-B. (Eds.). (2010). Mathematics education and technology – Rethinking the Terrain. The 17th ICMI Study. New York: Springer.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1979). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Pédauque, R. T. (Coll.) (2006). Le document à la lumière du numérique. Caen: C & F éditions.
Perrin-Glorian, M.-J., DeBlois, L., & Robert, A. (2008). Individual practising mathematics teachers. Studies on their professional growth. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), Participants in mathematics teacher education (pp. 35–59). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies, approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Paris: Armand Colin (English version at http://ergoserv.psy.univ-paris8.fr/Site/default.asp?Act_group=1).
Rabardel, P., & Bourmaud, G. (2003). From computer to instrument system: A developmental perspective. Interacting with Computers, 15(5), 665–691.
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
Salin, M.-H. (1999). Pratiques ostensives des enseignants. In G. Lemoyne & F. Conne (Dir.) (Eds.), Le cognitif en didactique des mathématiques (pp. 327–352). Montréal: Les presses de l’Université de Montréal.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.
Trouche, L. (2004). Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9, 281–307.
Vergnaud, G. (1998). Toward a cognitive theory of practice. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (pp. 227–241). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Vygotski, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Acknowledgements
The authors warmly thank Jill Adler for her comments, and in particular for her revision of the English language in this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Myriam, Additional Data
Activity type (and math. theme, if relevant) | Precise place | Time | Other persons involved | Resources used | Materials produced | Archiving (what? where?) | Comments |
Lesson about functions | Classroom | 10.00–10.55 (A.M.) | The class (grade 9) | Method sheet Online exercises (MatouMatheux) Videoprojector | Students sheet about reading images and antecedents | Ring binder grade 9 | |
Discussion with the bursar | Dining hall | 12.45 | The bursar | She informs me that my webcam has been delivered | |||
Report of the day’s lesson | Home | 5.00–5.15 (P.M.) | Personal notebook |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gueudet, G., Trouche, L. (2011). Teachers’ Work with Resources: Documentational Geneses and Professional Geneses. In: Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., Trouche, L. (eds) From Text to 'Lived' Resources. Mathematics Teacher Education, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1965-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1966-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)