Philosophy of Behavioral Biology

Volume 282 of the series Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science pp 167-187


Human Artistic Behaviour: Adaptation, Byproduct, or Cultural Group Selection?

  • Johan De SmedtAffiliated withDepartment of Philosophy and Ethics, Ghent University Email author 
  • , Helen De CruzAffiliated withCentre for Logic and Analytical Philosophy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access


Evolutionary accounts of art fall naturally into two categories: those that propose that art is an adaptation, and those that propose it is a byproduct of adaptations which evolved for different purposes. Although each of these positions can be supported by a wide range of empirical evidence, we will argue that there are shortcomings in each type of explanation. We will propose the alternative that the earliest art arose as a product of cultural group selection, drawing on theoretical models of altruism, anthropological observations of the use of art in extant small-scale societies and archaeological findings from Upper Palaeolithic Europe, in particular the Magdalenian cultural complex.