Advertisement

Heuristic Evolutionary Psychology

  • Armin W. Schulz
Chapter
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 282)

Abstract

Evolutionary psychologists are frequently accused of merely presenting evidentially unsupported speculations about the way our minds work, and of thus not being able to make compelling contributions to the science of psychology. In response, they tend to offer one of two arguments: they either claim that they do have this evidence (so that the above criticism understates the empirical support the program really has), or that they do not need this evidence, as they are using evolutionary theory merely as a heuristic device. In this paper, I critically assess the second of these responses. Specifically, I argue that, on the one hand, most examples of evolutionary psychological research – including classic ones such as Cosmides & Tooby’s work on cheater detection – do not show that there are fruitful heuristic uses of evolutionary theory in psychology. On the other hand, though, I also argue that Gergely and Csibra’s recent work on the psychology of pedagogy does show this. In this way, I make clear that the heuristic defence of evolutionary psychology, while plausible in particular cases, is not as universally compelling as is commonly supposed.

Keywords

Evolutionary Theory Social Exchange Evolutionary Perspective Evolutionary Psychology Evolutionary Hypothesis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andrews, P., Gangestad, S. & Matthews, D. (2002): ‘Adaptationism – How to Carry out an Exaptationist Program’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25: 489–553.Google Scholar
  2. Barkow, J., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (Eds): The Adapted Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Buller, D. (2005): Adapting Minds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Buller, D., Fodor, J. & Crume, T. (2005): ‘The Emperor is Still Under-Dressed’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 508–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buss, D. (2003): ‘Sexual Strategies: A Journey into Controversy’. Psychological Inquiry 14: 219–226.Google Scholar
  6. Buss, D., Haselton, M., Shackelford, T., Bleske, A. & Wakefield, J. (1998): ‘Adaptations, Exaptations, and Spandrels.’ American Psychologist 53: 533–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buss, D. & Schmitt, D. (1993): ‘Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating’. Psychological Review, 100: 204–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carruthers, P. (2006): The Architecture of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cosmides, L. (1985): Deduction or Darwinian Algorithms? An Explanation of the “Elusive” Content Effect on the Wason Selection Task. Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  10. Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1989): ‘Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Part II: A Computational Theory of Social Exchange’ Ethology and Sociobiology 10: 51–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1992): ‘The Psychological Foundations of Culture’. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (Eds): The Adapted Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1992b): ‘Cognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange’. In L. Cosmides, J. Tooby, & J. Barkow (Eds): The Adapted Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 163–228.Google Scholar
  13. Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (2005): ‘Neurocognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange’. In D. Buss (Ed.): Evolutionary Psychology Handbook. Hoboken: John Wiley, pp. 584–627.Google Scholar
  14. Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (2008): ‘When Falsification Strikes: A Reply to Fodor’. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.): Moral psychology, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Csibra, G. & Gergely, G. (2006): ‘Social Learning and Social Cognition: The Case for Pedagogy’. In T. Munakata & M. H. Johnson (Eds): Processes of Change in Brain and Cognitive Development: Attention and Performance, XXI. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 249–274.Google Scholar
  16. Davies, P. (2002): ‘Does Past Selective Efficacy Matter to Psychology?’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25: 513–514.Google Scholar
  17. Dupré, J. (2001): Human Nature and the Limits of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gangestad, S. W. & Thornhill, R. (1997): ‘The Evolutionary Psychology of Extrapair Sex: The role of Fluctuating Asymmetry’. Evolution and Human Behavior 18: 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gigerenzer, G. & Selten, R. (2001) (Eds): Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  20. Gergely, G. & Csibra, G. (2009): ‘Natural Pedagogy’. Trends in Cognitive Science 13: 148–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gergely, G. Egyed, K. & Kiraly, I. (2007): ‘On Pedagogy’. Developmental Science 10: 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson-Laird, P. (1982): ‘Thinking as a Skill’. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 34A: 1–29.Google Scholar
  23. Kitcher, P. (1985): Vaulting Ambition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Machery, E. (forthcoming): ‘Discovery and Confirmation in Evolutionary Psychology’. In J. Prinz (Ed): The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Meltzoff, A. (1988): ‘Infant Imitation after a 1-Week Delay: Long-Term Memory for Novel Acts and Multiple Stimuli’. Developmental Psychology, 24: 470–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pinker, S. (1997): How the Mind Works. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pinker, S. & Bloom, P. (1990): ‘Natural Language and Natural Selection’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 707–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Premack, D. & Premack, A. J. (2003): Original Intelligence. Unlocking the Mystery of Who We Are. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Richardson, R. (2007): Evolutionary Psychology as Maladapted Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Samuels, R., Stich, S. & Faucher, L. (2004): ‘Reason and Rationality’. In I. Niiniluoto, M. Sintonen & J. Wolenski (Eds): Handbook of Epistemology. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
  31. Schulz, A. W. (2010): ‘It Takes Two: Sexual Strategies and Game Theory’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41: 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shapiro, L. & Epstein, W. (1998): ‘Evolutionary Theory Meets Cognitive Psychology: A More Selective Perspective’. Mind and Language 13: 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simon, H. (1957): Models of Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sober, E. (2008): Evidence and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sterelny, K. (2003): Thought in a Hostile World. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Tomasello, M (1999): The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wason, P. (1966): ‘Reasoning’. In B.M. Foss (Ed): New Horizons in Psychology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  38. Wason, P. (1983): ‘Realism and Rationality in the Selection Task’. In J. B.T. Evans (Ed): Thinking and Reasoning: Psychological Approaches. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Logic, and Scientific MethodLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations